Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Factors Influencing Adherence to Standard Precautions Scale.

Q3 Nursing
Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS Pub Date : 2025-06-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240249.en
Gabriela da Cunha Januário, Vanderlei José Haas, Damiana Aparecida Trindade Monteiro, Elucir Gir, Fernanda Maria Vieira Pereira Ávila, Mariana Alvina Dos Santos, Stephane Bouchoucha, Silmara Elaine Malaguti Toffano
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Factors Influencing Adherence to Standard Precautions Scale.","authors":"Gabriela da Cunha Januário, Vanderlei José Haas, Damiana Aparecida Trindade Monteiro, Elucir Gir, Fernanda Maria Vieira Pereira Ávila, Mariana Alvina Dos Santos, Stephane Bouchoucha, Silmara Elaine Malaguti Toffano","doi":"10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240249.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Factors Influencing Adherence to Standard Precautions Scale.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Psychometric study, conducted in a hospital in Minas Gerais, with 407 nursing professionals. Data collection took place between August 2022 and September 2023 using a sociodemographic questionnaire and the Brazilian version of the scale. To characterize the sample, measures of central tendency and dispersion were used. Regarding the psychometric properties of the instrument, validity evidence methods based on the internal structure were adopted, using confirmatory factor analysis and reliability, through test-retest and internal consistency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The confirmatory factor analysis revealed a model that was adequately fit to the dimensional structure. The domains showed factor loadings ranging from 0.31 to 0.73 for leadership, 0.345 to 0.83 for justification, 0.12 to 0.69 for organizational culture and practice, 0.37 to 0.84 for contextual cues, and 0.52 to 0.80 for judgment. Regarding reliability, good correlation was observed for the instrument's domains, with an intraclass correlation range (0.48 to 0.95) and internal consistency (0.52 to 0.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Brazilian version of the scale revealed a model adjusted to the dimensional structure proposed by the Australian authors, proving to be valid, stable and reliable to identify the factors that influence adherence to standard precautions among nursing professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":35609,"journal":{"name":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","volume":"46 ","pages":"e20240249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240249.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Factors Influencing Adherence to Standard Precautions Scale.

Method: Psychometric study, conducted in a hospital in Minas Gerais, with 407 nursing professionals. Data collection took place between August 2022 and September 2023 using a sociodemographic questionnaire and the Brazilian version of the scale. To characterize the sample, measures of central tendency and dispersion were used. Regarding the psychometric properties of the instrument, validity evidence methods based on the internal structure were adopted, using confirmatory factor analysis and reliability, through test-retest and internal consistency.

Results: The confirmatory factor analysis revealed a model that was adequately fit to the dimensional structure. The domains showed factor loadings ranging from 0.31 to 0.73 for leadership, 0.345 to 0.83 for justification, 0.12 to 0.69 for organizational culture and practice, 0.37 to 0.84 for contextual cues, and 0.52 to 0.80 for judgment. Regarding reliability, good correlation was observed for the instrument's domains, with an intraclass correlation range (0.48 to 0.95) and internal consistency (0.52 to 0.80).

Conclusion: The Brazilian version of the scale revealed a model adjusted to the dimensional structure proposed by the Australian authors, proving to be valid, stable and reliable to identify the factors that influence adherence to standard precautions among nursing professionals.

巴西版《影响遵守标准预防措施量表的因素》的心理测量特性。
目的:评价巴西版《影响遵守标准预防措施的因素》量表的心理测量特征。方法:在米纳斯吉拉斯州一家医院对407名护理专业人员进行心理测量研究。数据收集在2022年8月至2023年9月期间进行,使用了社会人口调查问卷和巴西版本的量表。为了描述样本的特征,使用了集中趋势和分散的测量。针对仪器的心理测量特性,采用基于内部结构的效度证据法,采用验证性因子分析和信度法,通过重测和内部一致性进行检验。结果:验证性因子分析显示模型与维度结构有较好的拟合。这些领域的因素负荷范围为:领导能力为0.31 ~ 0.73,理由为0.345 ~ 0.83,组织文化与实践为0.12 ~ 0.69,情境线索为0.37 ~ 0.84,判断为0.52 ~ 0.80。在可靠性方面,仪器的域具有良好的相关性,类内相关范围(0.48至0.95)和内部一致性(0.52至0.80)。结论:巴西版本的量表显示了一个调整到澳大利亚作者提出的维度结构的模型,证明在确定影响护理专业人员遵守标准预防措施的因素方面是有效、稳定和可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: A Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul edita e publica a Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem para divulgar a produção científica da Enfermagem e áreas afins. Foi criada em 1976 e atualmente tem periodicidade trimestral.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信