Invisible Gorillas in the Mind: Internal Inattentional Blindness and the Prospect of Introspection Training.

Q1 Social Sciences
Open Mind Pub Date : 2025-04-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1162/opmi_a_00204
Adam Morris
{"title":"Invisible Gorillas in the Mind: Internal Inattentional Blindness and the Prospect of Introspection Training.","authors":"Adam Morris","doi":"10.1162/opmi_a_00204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Much of high-level cognition appears inaccessible to consciousness. Countless studies have revealed mental processes-like those underlying our choices, beliefs, judgments, intuitions, etc.-which people do not notice or report, and these findings have had a widespread influence on the theory and application of psychological science. However, the interpretation of these findings is uncertain. Making an analogy to perceptual consciousness research, I argue that much of the unconsciousness of high-level cognition is plausibly due to <i>internal inattentional blindness</i>: missing an otherwise consciously-accessible internal event because your attention was elsewhere. In other words, rather than being structurally unconscious, many higher mental processes might instead be \"preconscious\", and would become conscious if a person attended to them. I synthesize existing indirect evidence for this claim, argue that it is a foundational and largely untested assumption in many applied interventions (such as therapy and mindfulness practices), and suggest that, with careful experimentation, it could form the basis for a long-sought-after science of introspection training.</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"9 ","pages":"606-634"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12136916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Much of high-level cognition appears inaccessible to consciousness. Countless studies have revealed mental processes-like those underlying our choices, beliefs, judgments, intuitions, etc.-which people do not notice or report, and these findings have had a widespread influence on the theory and application of psychological science. However, the interpretation of these findings is uncertain. Making an analogy to perceptual consciousness research, I argue that much of the unconsciousness of high-level cognition is plausibly due to internal inattentional blindness: missing an otherwise consciously-accessible internal event because your attention was elsewhere. In other words, rather than being structurally unconscious, many higher mental processes might instead be "preconscious", and would become conscious if a person attended to them. I synthesize existing indirect evidence for this claim, argue that it is a foundational and largely untested assumption in many applied interventions (such as therapy and mindfulness practices), and suggest that, with careful experimentation, it could form the basis for a long-sought-after science of introspection training.

心灵中看不见的大猩猩:内在的不注意盲目性和内省训练的前景。
许多高层次的认知似乎是意识无法达到的。无数的研究揭示了人们没有注意到或报告的心理过程,比如那些隐藏在我们的选择、信仰、判断、直觉等背后的心理过程。这些发现对心理科学的理论和应用产生了广泛的影响。然而,这些发现的解释是不确定的。用知觉意识研究来类比,我认为高水平认知的大部分无意识似乎是由于内在的不注意盲目性:因为你的注意力在别处而错过了一个本来可以有意识地接触到的内部事件。换句话说,许多更高层次的心理过程可能是“前意识”的,而不是结构性无意识的,如果有人注意到它们,它们就会变得有意识。我综合了这一说法的现有间接证据,认为这是一个基本的,在许多应用干预(如治疗和正念练习)中基本上未经检验的假设,并建议,通过仔细的实验,它可以形成长期追求的内省训练科学的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Mind
Open Mind Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信