Rationality of Efficacy of the Treatment Modalities-Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Hall Technique by Comparing Clinical and Radiographic Parameters along with Posttreatment Behavioral Assessment of Patients through Face Pain Scale-Revised: An In Vivo Study.

Q3 Dentistry
Kumari Neesu, Ashish Saxena, Shikhar P Chauhan, Neha Verma
{"title":"Rationality of Efficacy of the Treatment Modalities-Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Hall Technique by Comparing Clinical and Radiographic Parameters along with Posttreatment Behavioral Assessment of Patients through Face Pain Scale-Revised: An <i>In Vivo</i> Study.","authors":"Kumari Neesu, Ashish Saxena, Shikhar P Chauhan, Neha Verma","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim and objectives: </strong>The study aimed to assess and compare the success of primary molars after restoration with modified atraumatic restorative treatment (mART) and stainless steel crowns (SSCs) through the Hall technique (HT) on primary molars by clinical and radiographic examination, along with posttreatment behavioral assessment of patients through Face Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>On the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the study population aged 4-9 years was selected. A split-mouth study design was used. All the participants were divided into two groups: group I received mART as restorative treatment, and group II received SSCs as restorations. The FPS-R was used as a means of pain perception during the treatment, and it was assessed after the completion of both procedures. A follow-up at 3, 6, and 9 months was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 participants had resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) restorations in good condition, compared to 29 participants in group II who had restorations in perfect condition. However, the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups, and the majority of participants in both groups pointed toward nagging face pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study found a higher incidence of clinical and radiographic failures in the mART group. A viable restorative option for carious primary molars was found to be the HT, which is additionally convenient, child-friendly, and less invasive, despite causing mild postoperative discomfort. To a lesser extent, RMGIC restorations with partial excavation were also successful. Therefore, based on case selection, clinical judgment, and child cooperation, these minimally invasive approaches can be implemented.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Neesu K, Saxena A, Chauhan SP. Rationality of Efficacy of the Treatment Modalities-Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Hall Technique by Comparing Clinical and Radiographic Parameters along with Posttreatment Behavioral Assessment of Patients through Face Pain Scale-Revised: An <i>In Vivo</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(4):444-451.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"18 4","pages":"444-451"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12131049/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim and objectives: The study aimed to assess and compare the success of primary molars after restoration with modified atraumatic restorative treatment (mART) and stainless steel crowns (SSCs) through the Hall technique (HT) on primary molars by clinical and radiographic examination, along with posttreatment behavioral assessment of patients through Face Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R).

Materials and methods: On the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the study population aged 4-9 years was selected. A split-mouth study design was used. All the participants were divided into two groups: group I received mART as restorative treatment, and group II received SSCs as restorations. The FPS-R was used as a means of pain perception during the treatment, and it was assessed after the completion of both procedures. A follow-up at 3, 6, and 9 months was recorded.

Results: A total of 11 participants had resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) restorations in good condition, compared to 29 participants in group II who had restorations in perfect condition. However, the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups, and the majority of participants in both groups pointed toward nagging face pain.

Conclusion: The present study found a higher incidence of clinical and radiographic failures in the mART group. A viable restorative option for carious primary molars was found to be the HT, which is additionally convenient, child-friendly, and less invasive, despite causing mild postoperative discomfort. To a lesser extent, RMGIC restorations with partial excavation were also successful. Therefore, based on case selection, clinical judgment, and child cooperation, these minimally invasive approaches can be implemented.

How to cite this article: Neesu K, Saxena A, Chauhan SP. Rationality of Efficacy of the Treatment Modalities-Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Hall Technique by Comparing Clinical and Radiographic Parameters along with Posttreatment Behavioral Assessment of Patients through Face Pain Scale-Revised: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(4):444-451.

改良的非创伤性恢复性治疗和霍尔技术治疗方式的有效性的合理性:通过比较临床和影像学参数以及通过修订的面部疼痛量表对患者进行治疗后行为评估:一项体内研究
目的和目的:本研究旨在通过临床和影像学检查,以及通过面部疼痛量表(ps - r)对患者进行治疗后行为评估,评估和比较改良的非创伤性修复治疗(mART)和不锈钢冠(ssc)通过霍尔技术(HT)修复初生磨牙后的成功率。材料和方法:根据纳入和排除标准,选择4-9岁的研究人群。采用裂口研究设计。将所有参与者分为两组:第一组采用mART修复治疗,第二组采用ssc修复治疗。在治疗过程中,FPS-R被用作疼痛感知的一种手段,并在两个程序完成后进行评估。随访3、6、9个月。结果:共有11名参与者的树脂改性玻璃离子水门铁(RMGIC)修复体处于良好状态,而第二组有29名参与者的修复体处于完美状态。然而,两组之间的差异在统计上并不显著,两组中的大多数参与者都指出了恼人的面部疼痛。结论:本研究发现,mART组的临床和影像学失败发生率较高。对于龋齿的一种可行的修复选择是HT,尽管会引起轻微的术后不适,但它更方便,儿童友好,侵入性更小。在较小程度上,部分挖掘的RMGIC修复也是成功的。因此,基于病例选择、临床判断和儿童配合,这些微创方法是可以实施的。Neesu K, Saxena A, Chauhan SP.改进的非创伤性修复治疗和Hall技术治疗方式的有效性:一项基于面部疼痛量表的临床和影像学参数对比及治疗后行为评估的体内研究。中华临床儿科杂志,2015;18(4):444-451。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信