The potential use of artificial intelligence in reviewing atypical small acinar proliferation in prostate core biopsy.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Shiguang Liu, Mohsin Jamal, Carmen Smotherman, Ifra Badar, Zoobia Khan, Shahla Masood
{"title":"The potential use of artificial intelligence in reviewing atypical small acinar proliferation in prostate core biopsy.","authors":"Shiguang Liu, Mohsin Jamal, Carmen Smotherman, Ifra Badar, Zoobia Khan, Shahla Masood","doi":"10.1007/s00428-025-04136-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prostate cancer is the most common diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death among men in the United States. The gold standard for the diagnosis of prostate cancer is the examination of tissue from a systemic 12- or 14-core biopsy procedure by an anatomic pathologist. Atypical small acinar proliferation in prostate core biopsy is an indefinite diagnosis, and may cause difficulties in clinical management. To investigate the potential use of artificial intelligence in reviewing atypical small acinar proliferation, Paige Prostate, an FDA-approved artificial intelligence-based digital diagnostic system, was used to review the digital images of 107 cores with an initial diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation. Two pathologists blindly reclassified the cores with a new diagnosis (either benign or malignant) for 85% of the cases (pathologist #1) and 88% (pathologist #2), respectively. Paige Prostate resulted in consistent diagnosis in 85% of the cores (\"suspicious\" or \"not suspicious\"). The consistency rates were 77% between the two pathologists, 66% and 75% between Paige Prostate and each pathologist. There was statistically significant agreement among the three consistency rates. Although some degree of interobserver discrepancy still exists, our findings indicate that artificial intelligence was compatible with the pathologist review, and it can be a unique diagnostic adjunct for pathologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-025-04136-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most common diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death among men in the United States. The gold standard for the diagnosis of prostate cancer is the examination of tissue from a systemic 12- or 14-core biopsy procedure by an anatomic pathologist. Atypical small acinar proliferation in prostate core biopsy is an indefinite diagnosis, and may cause difficulties in clinical management. To investigate the potential use of artificial intelligence in reviewing atypical small acinar proliferation, Paige Prostate, an FDA-approved artificial intelligence-based digital diagnostic system, was used to review the digital images of 107 cores with an initial diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation. Two pathologists blindly reclassified the cores with a new diagnosis (either benign or malignant) for 85% of the cases (pathologist #1) and 88% (pathologist #2), respectively. Paige Prostate resulted in consistent diagnosis in 85% of the cores ("suspicious" or "not suspicious"). The consistency rates were 77% between the two pathologists, 66% and 75% between Paige Prostate and each pathologist. There was statistically significant agreement among the three consistency rates. Although some degree of interobserver discrepancy still exists, our findings indicate that artificial intelligence was compatible with the pathologist review, and it can be a unique diagnostic adjunct for pathologists.

人工智能在前列腺核心活检非典型小腺泡增生中的潜在应用。
前列腺癌是最常见的诊断癌症,也是美国男性癌症死亡的第二大原因。诊断前列腺癌的金标准是由解剖病理学家进行系统性的12或14核活组织检查。非典型小腺泡增生的前列腺核心活检是一个不明确的诊断,并可能造成困难的临床处理。为了探讨人工智能在非典型小腺泡增生诊断中的潜在应用,采用fda批准的基于人工智能的数字诊断系统Paige前列腺,对107例初始诊断为非典型小腺泡增生的核的数字图像进行了回顾性分析。两名病理学家分别对85%(病理学家#1)和88%(病理学家#2)的病例盲目地用新的诊断(良性或恶性)重新分类核心。在85%的核心(“可疑”或“不可疑”)中,Paige前列腺检查得出一致的诊断。两位病理学家的一致性率为77%,Paige前列腺和每位病理学家的一致性率分别为66%和75%。三个一致性率之间有统计学上的显著一致性。尽管观察者之间仍然存在一定程度的差异,但我们的研究结果表明,人工智能与病理学家的评论是兼容的,它可以成为病理学家的独特诊断辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Virchows Archiv
Virchows Archiv 医学-病理学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信