Remote Donor Release in Plasmapheresis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Rainer Moog, Lena Brückle, Oliver Xia
{"title":"Remote Donor Release in Plasmapheresis.","authors":"Rainer Moog, Lena Brückle, Oliver Xia","doi":"10.1159/000545794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Blood donor release prior to donation by a physician is mandatory in Germany according to current guidelines. Due to shortage of qualified staff, the German Transfusion Act was modified allowing the use of telemedicine. The aim of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of remote plasma donor release with respect to donor acceptance and safety.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>In September and October 2024, remote donor release was studied in two plasmapheresis centres. Physicians not present in the participating centres digitally evaluated donor eligibility and released donors for plasma donation. Donors were asked about the procedure by means of a questionnaire after donation. Additionally, staff had the possibility to rate the procedure at the end of the study. Donor adverse events (AEs) were recorded and their severity and causality related to plasmapheresis were rated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 243 donors fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Rating of donation safety by donors as well as future use of telemedicine procedures was fine. Staff also welcomed the introduction of telemedicine. The possible time saving of waiting time due to the use of telemedicine was appreciated. One mild AE was reported and the rate of AEs was 0.41%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our pilot study shows that remote release of plasma donors is feasible and accepted by both donors and staff. There were no concerns about donation safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":23252,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545794","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Blood donor release prior to donation by a physician is mandatory in Germany according to current guidelines. Due to shortage of qualified staff, the German Transfusion Act was modified allowing the use of telemedicine. The aim of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of remote plasma donor release with respect to donor acceptance and safety.

Study design and methods: In September and October 2024, remote donor release was studied in two plasmapheresis centres. Physicians not present in the participating centres digitally evaluated donor eligibility and released donors for plasma donation. Donors were asked about the procedure by means of a questionnaire after donation. Additionally, staff had the possibility to rate the procedure at the end of the study. Donor adverse events (AEs) were recorded and their severity and causality related to plasmapheresis were rated.

Results: A total of 243 donors fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Rating of donation safety by donors as well as future use of telemedicine procedures was fine. Staff also welcomed the introduction of telemedicine. The possible time saving of waiting time due to the use of telemedicine was appreciated. One mild AE was reported and the rate of AEs was 0.41%.

Conclusion: Our pilot study shows that remote release of plasma donors is feasible and accepted by both donors and staff. There were no concerns about donation safety.

血浆置换中的远程供体释放。
背景和目的:在德国,根据目前的指导方针,献血者在献血前由医生释放血液是强制性的。由于缺乏合格的工作人员,德国输血法被修改,允许使用远程医疗。本研究的目的是探讨远程血浆释放在供体接受度和安全性方面的可行性。研究设计和方法:2024年9月和10月,在两个血浆分离中心进行远程供体释放研究。不在参与中心的医生对供体资格进行数字化评估,并释放供体进行血浆捐赠。捐赠者在捐赠后通过问卷调查的方式询问了捐赠过程。此外,工作人员有可能在研究结束时对程序进行评分。记录供体不良事件(ae),并对其严重程度和与血浆置换相关的因果关系进行评分。结果:符合入选标准的献血者243例被纳入研究。捐赠者对捐赠安全性的评价以及未来远程医疗程序的使用情况都很好。工作人员还欢迎采用远程医疗。与会者赞赏由于使用远程医疗而可能节省的等待时间。轻度AE 1例,发生率0.41%。结论:我们的初步研究表明,血浆献血者远程释放是可行的,并为献血者和工作人员所接受。没有对捐赠安全的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal is devoted to all areas of transfusion medicine. These include the quality and security of blood products, therapy with blood components and plasma derivatives, transfusion-related questions in transplantation, stem cell manipulation, therapeutic and diagnostic problems of homeostasis, immuno-hematological investigations, and legal aspects of the production of blood products as well as hemotherapy. Both comprehensive reviews and primary publications that detail the newest work in transfusion medicine and hemotherapy promote the international exchange of knowledge within these disciplines. Consistent with this goal, continuing clinical education is also specifically addressed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信