Exploring Benefits of Non-Intubated Surgery for Lung Biopsy in Interstitial Lung Disease.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Respirology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-04 DOI:10.1111/resp.70067
Aude Nguyen, Timothée Jouitteau, Arnaud Bourdin, Anne-Sophie Gamez, Laurence Solovei, José Molina, Kheira Hireche
{"title":"Exploring Benefits of Non-Intubated Surgery for Lung Biopsy in Interstitial Lung Disease.","authors":"Aude Nguyen, Timothée Jouitteau, Arnaud Bourdin, Anne-Sophie Gamez, Laurence Solovei, José Molina, Kheira Hireche","doi":"10.1111/resp.70067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>General anaesthesia with intubation is the standard technique for video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). However, non-intubated VATS (NIVATS) is emerging as a less invasive alternative, particularly for lung biopsies in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and impaired respiratory function. This study aims to investigate the benefits of non-intubated surgery on postoperative respiratory function and to compare operative outcomes between intubated VATS (IVATS) and NIVATS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-centre retrospective study of patients who underwent lung biopsy for ILD diagnosis via VATS between January 2020 and September 2023 at Montpellier University Hospital. Primary outcomes included the variation in pulmonary function tests after surgery (FEV<sub>1</sub>, FVC, DLCO). Secondly, this study compares clinical postoperative outcomes and diagnostic yield between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 61 patients, with 42% (n = 26) undergoing NIVATS. The NIVATS group showed a significantly smaller decrease in postoperative FEV<sub>1</sub> and FVC compared to the IVATS group (p = 0.001 for both variables). Additionally, NIVATS was associated with shorter operating room time (247 min vs. 288 min, p = 0.013), reduced hospital stay duration (47.5 h vs. 65.2 h, p = 0.018), and decreased need for additional analgesics (3% vs. 15%, p = 0.001). Diagnostic yield was at least similar to IVATS. There were no significant differences in DLCO or chest tube duration between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NIVATS offers better preservation of respiratory function, a good diagnostic yield, and improved overall outcomes following surgical lung biopsy in patients with ILD and could be a preferred technique for diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":21129,"journal":{"name":"Respirology","volume":" ","pages":"949-956"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respirology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.70067","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: General anaesthesia with intubation is the standard technique for video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). However, non-intubated VATS (NIVATS) is emerging as a less invasive alternative, particularly for lung biopsies in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and impaired respiratory function. This study aims to investigate the benefits of non-intubated surgery on postoperative respiratory function and to compare operative outcomes between intubated VATS (IVATS) and NIVATS.

Methods: We conducted a single-centre retrospective study of patients who underwent lung biopsy for ILD diagnosis via VATS between January 2020 and September 2023 at Montpellier University Hospital. Primary outcomes included the variation in pulmonary function tests after surgery (FEV1, FVC, DLCO). Secondly, this study compares clinical postoperative outcomes and diagnostic yield between the two groups.

Results: The study included 61 patients, with 42% (n = 26) undergoing NIVATS. The NIVATS group showed a significantly smaller decrease in postoperative FEV1 and FVC compared to the IVATS group (p = 0.001 for both variables). Additionally, NIVATS was associated with shorter operating room time (247 min vs. 288 min, p = 0.013), reduced hospital stay duration (47.5 h vs. 65.2 h, p = 0.018), and decreased need for additional analgesics (3% vs. 15%, p = 0.001). Diagnostic yield was at least similar to IVATS. There were no significant differences in DLCO or chest tube duration between the two groups.

Conclusions: NIVATS offers better preservation of respiratory function, a good diagnostic yield, and improved overall outcomes following surgical lung biopsy in patients with ILD and could be a preferred technique for diagnosis.

探讨间质性肺疾病非插管手术肺活检的益处。
背景和目的:气管插管全身麻醉是胸外科视频辅助手术(VATS)的标准技术。然而,非插管VATS (NIVATS)正在成为一种侵入性较小的替代方法,特别是对于间质性肺疾病(ILD)和呼吸功能受损患者的肺活检。本研究旨在探讨非插管手术对术后呼吸功能的益处,并比较插管VATS (IVATS)和NIVATS的手术效果。方法:我们对2020年1月至2023年9月期间在蒙彼利埃大学医院通过VATS进行肺活检诊断ILD的患者进行了一项单中心回顾性研究。主要结局包括术后肺功能测试(FEV1、FVC、DLCO)的变化。其次,比较两组患者的临床术后结局和诊断率。结果:该研究纳入61例患者,其中42% (n = 26)接受了NIVATS。与IVATS组相比,NIVATS组术后FEV1和FVC的下降幅度明显较小(两个变量的p = 0.001)。此外,NIVATS与更短的手术室时间(247分钟对288分钟,p = 0.013)、更短的住院时间(47.5小时对65.2小时,p = 0.018)和减少额外镇痛药的需求(3%对15%,p = 0.001)相关。诊断率至少与IVATS相似。两组间DLCO和胸管时间无显著差异。结论:NIVATS可以更好地保存呼吸功能,良好的诊断率,改善ILD患者手术肺活检后的总体预后,可能是一种首选的诊断技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respirology
Respirology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
5.80%
发文量
225
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Respirology is a journal of international standing, publishing peer-reviewed articles of scientific excellence in clinical and clinically-relevant experimental respiratory biology and disease. Fields of research include immunology, intensive and critical care, epidemiology, cell and molecular biology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, paediatric respiratory medicine, clinical trials, interventional pulmonology and thoracic surgery. The Journal aims to encourage the international exchange of results and publishes papers in the following categories: Original Articles, Editorials, Reviews, and Correspondences. Respirology is the preferred journal of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand, has been adopted as the preferred English journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society and the Taiwan Society of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and is an official journal of the World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信