Predictive factors of stigma in stroke patients based on logistic regression and decision tree mode.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Wenwen Ma, Kunjuan Jing, Ruotong Zhang, Xuefei Li, Zheng Li
{"title":"Predictive factors of stigma in stroke patients based on logistic regression and decision tree mode.","authors":"Wenwen Ma, Kunjuan Jing, Ruotong Zhang, Xuefei Li, Zheng Li","doi":"10.12669/pjms.41.5.9946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Logistic regression and decision tree model were used to analyze the predictive factors of stigma in stroke patients, and to explore the application value of the two models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study. The data of 342 stroke patients were collected from Baoding No.1 Central Hospital from December 2023 to March 2024. Data were retrospectively retrieved from the hospital information and management system. The regression model and decision tree model of influencing factors of stroke patients' sense of stigma were established, to analyze the influencing factors of the sense of stigma, and to compare the predictive effects, advantages and disadvantages of the two models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Logistic regression analysis showed that threat assessment (OR=2.7761) was a risk factor for stigma, while irrelevant cognitive appraisal (OR=0.321), social support (OR=0.098) and resilience (OR=0.438) were protective factors. The results of the decision tree model showed that the patients' psychological resilience was the most important factor affecting the sense of stigma, followed by social support and threat assessment. The AUC of the decision tree model and Logistic regression model were 0.854 and 0.880, respectively, and the accuracy were 78.7% and 79.6%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Threat, irrelevant cognitive appraisal, social support and resilience might be the predictive factors of stigma in stroke patients. The AUC and accuracy of the decision tree model were slightly lower than that of the Logistic regression model.</p>","PeriodicalId":19958,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"41 5","pages":"1482-1487"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12130943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.41.5.9946","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Logistic regression and decision tree model were used to analyze the predictive factors of stigma in stroke patients, and to explore the application value of the two models.

Methods: This was a retrospective study. The data of 342 stroke patients were collected from Baoding No.1 Central Hospital from December 2023 to March 2024. Data were retrospectively retrieved from the hospital information and management system. The regression model and decision tree model of influencing factors of stroke patients' sense of stigma were established, to analyze the influencing factors of the sense of stigma, and to compare the predictive effects, advantages and disadvantages of the two models.

Results: Logistic regression analysis showed that threat assessment (OR=2.7761) was a risk factor for stigma, while irrelevant cognitive appraisal (OR=0.321), social support (OR=0.098) and resilience (OR=0.438) were protective factors. The results of the decision tree model showed that the patients' psychological resilience was the most important factor affecting the sense of stigma, followed by social support and threat assessment. The AUC of the decision tree model and Logistic regression model were 0.854 and 0.880, respectively, and the accuracy were 78.7% and 79.6%, respectively.

Conclusion: Threat, irrelevant cognitive appraisal, social support and resilience might be the predictive factors of stigma in stroke patients. The AUC and accuracy of the decision tree model were slightly lower than that of the Logistic regression model.

基于logistic回归和决策树模型的脑卒中患者病耻感预测因素研究。
目的:采用Logistic回归和决策树模型分析脑卒中患者病耻感的预测因素,探讨两种模型的应用价值。方法:回顾性研究。选取保定市第一中心医院于2023年12月至2024年3月收治的脑卒中患者342例。回顾性地从医院信息和管理系统中检索数据。建立脑卒中患者病耻感影响因素的回归模型和决策树模型,分析病耻感的影响因素,比较两种模型的预测效果和优缺点。结果:Logistic回归分析显示,威胁评估(OR=2.7761)是病耻感发生的危险因素,无关认知评价(OR=0.321)、社会支持(OR=0.098)和心理韧性(OR=0.438)是病耻感发生的保护因素。决策树模型结果显示,患者的心理弹性是影响耻辱感的最重要因素,其次是社会支持和威胁评估。决策树模型和Logistic回归模型的AUC分别为0.854和0.880,准确率分别为78.7%和79.6%。结论:威胁、无关认知评价、社会支持和心理恢复可能是脑卒中患者病耻感的预测因素。决策树模型的AUC和准确率略低于Logistic回归模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
363
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: It is a peer reviewed medical journal published regularly since 1984. It was previously known as quarterly "SPECIALIST" till December 31st 1999. It publishes original research articles, review articles, current practices, short communications & case reports. It attracts manuscripts not only from within Pakistan but also from over fifty countries from abroad. Copies of PJMS are sent to all the import medical libraries all over Pakistan and overseas particularly in South East Asia and Asia Pacific besides WHO EMRO Region countries. Eminent members of the medical profession at home and abroad regularly contribute their write-ups, manuscripts in our publications. We pursue an independent editorial policy, which allows an opportunity to the healthcare professionals to express their views without any fear or favour. That is why many opinion makers among the medical and pharmaceutical profession use this publication to communicate their viewpoint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信