Comprehensive Review of Surgical Techniques for Correcting Cephalic Malposition of the Lower Lateral Cartilages in Rhinoplasty.

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-06-04 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006808
Aref Nassar, Joy Naba
{"title":"Comprehensive Review of Surgical Techniques for Correcting Cephalic Malposition of the Lower Lateral Cartilages in Rhinoplasty.","authors":"Aref Nassar, Joy Naba","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lateral crural malposition, characterized by lower lateral cartilages diverging less than 30 degrees from the midline toward the ipsilateral medial canthus, presents both functional and aesthetic challenges in rhinoplasty. Various surgical techniques have been described for correction, but no comprehensive review has compared their efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review was conducted to categorize and evaluate surgical techniques for correcting cephalic malposition. Techniques were grouped into flaps, grafts, lateral crura transection, and suture-based methods. Functional and aesthetic outcomes, as well as factors influencing technique selection, were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The selection of a surgical technique depends on factors such as surgeon expertise, cartilage availability, and patient-specific anatomical considerations. Although multiple techniques have demonstrated favorable outcomes, long-term data on complications and structural stability remain limited, highlighting the need for further research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This article is the first to comprehensively describe and compare surgical techniques for cephalic malposition correction. Further research is needed to establish evidence-based guidelines for technique selection and to assess long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 6","pages":"e6808"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12136668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lateral crural malposition, characterized by lower lateral cartilages diverging less than 30 degrees from the midline toward the ipsilateral medial canthus, presents both functional and aesthetic challenges in rhinoplasty. Various surgical techniques have been described for correction, but no comprehensive review has compared their efficacy.

Methods: A literature review was conducted to categorize and evaluate surgical techniques for correcting cephalic malposition. Techniques were grouped into flaps, grafts, lateral crura transection, and suture-based methods. Functional and aesthetic outcomes, as well as factors influencing technique selection, were analyzed.

Results: The selection of a surgical technique depends on factors such as surgeon expertise, cartilage availability, and patient-specific anatomical considerations. Although multiple techniques have demonstrated favorable outcomes, long-term data on complications and structural stability remain limited, highlighting the need for further research.

Conclusions: This article is the first to comprehensively describe and compare surgical techniques for cephalic malposition correction. Further research is needed to establish evidence-based guidelines for technique selection and to assess long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes.

鼻成形术中纠正下外侧软骨头位错位的外科技术综述。
背景:侧脚畸形,其特征是下外侧软骨从中线向同侧内眦偏离小于30度,在鼻整形术中提出了功能和美学方面的挑战。各种手术技术已被描述用于矫正,但没有全面的审查比较他们的疗效。方法:回顾文献,对矫正头位畸形的手术技术进行分类和评价。技术分为皮瓣、移植物、外侧脚横断和基于缝合线的方法。分析了功能和美学效果,以及影响技术选择的因素。结果:手术技术的选择取决于外科医生的专业知识、软骨的可用性和患者特定的解剖考虑等因素。尽管多种技术已显示出良好的结果,但并发症和结构稳定性的长期数据仍然有限,需要进一步研究。结论:本文首次对矫正头位错位的手术技术进行了全面的描述和比较。需要进一步的研究来建立以证据为基础的技术选择指南,并评估长期的功能和美学结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信