{"title":"Systematic Review of the Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Diametric Magnet Cochlear Implants.","authors":"Quan Lu, Sidney Spencer, Anita Jeyakumar","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Review the properties, safety, and artifacts of current cochlear implants (CI) with freely rotatable magnets during MRI scans.</p><p><strong>Databases reviewed: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science; last accessed September 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was BSMH IRB exempted. MESH term \"magnetic resonance imaging\" and phrases of \"Med-el Synchrony,\" \"Cochlear Nucleus Profile Plus,\" \"Advanced Bionics HiRes Ultra 3D,\" \"rotatable magnet cochlear,\" \"rotatable magnet,\" \"diametric magnet,\" \"diametric magnet cochlear implant,\" and \"MRI-safe cochlear implant\" using \"AND\" function. Non-English, non-human, non-implanted CI, and cadaveric studies were excluded. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and quality of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 18 studies. Fifteen assessed pain as a complication, with two reporting its occurrence: two cases for Synchrony and one for Ultra 3D. Demagnetization did not occur in the 12 studies that reported on it. One magnet displacement was noted with the Ultra 3D implant out of the 16 reporting studies. Artifacts were reported by 11 studies, with most scans retaining most to limited diagnostic usability. One Synchrony device required explantation due to artifact, and one was explanted before MRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Of the CI models reviewed with diametric magnets, Med-El Synchrony may enable MRI usage with fewer safety concerns when following the manufacturer's recommendations. However, clinical reports of freely rotatable CI safety during MRI scans are sparse and contain incomplete data. MRI artifacts from CI still pose concerns for image quality but can be minimized with appropriate implant location and scanning protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004556","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Review the properties, safety, and artifacts of current cochlear implants (CI) with freely rotatable magnets during MRI scans.
Databases reviewed: PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science; last accessed September 2023.
Methods: The study was BSMH IRB exempted. MESH term "magnetic resonance imaging" and phrases of "Med-el Synchrony," "Cochlear Nucleus Profile Plus," "Advanced Bionics HiRes Ultra 3D," "rotatable magnet cochlear," "rotatable magnet," "diametric magnet," "diametric magnet cochlear implant," and "MRI-safe cochlear implant" using "AND" function. Non-English, non-human, non-implanted CI, and cadaveric studies were excluded. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and quality of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE criteria.
Results: The review included 18 studies. Fifteen assessed pain as a complication, with two reporting its occurrence: two cases for Synchrony and one for Ultra 3D. Demagnetization did not occur in the 12 studies that reported on it. One magnet displacement was noted with the Ultra 3D implant out of the 16 reporting studies. Artifacts were reported by 11 studies, with most scans retaining most to limited diagnostic usability. One Synchrony device required explantation due to artifact, and one was explanted before MRI.
Conclusion: Of the CI models reviewed with diametric magnets, Med-El Synchrony may enable MRI usage with fewer safety concerns when following the manufacturer's recommendations. However, clinical reports of freely rotatable CI safety during MRI scans are sparse and contain incomplete data. MRI artifacts from CI still pose concerns for image quality but can be minimized with appropriate implant location and scanning protocols.
期刊介绍:
Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.