Systematic Review of the Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Diametric Magnet Cochlear Implants.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Quan Lu, Sidney Spencer, Anita Jeyakumar
{"title":"Systematic Review of the Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Diametric Magnet Cochlear Implants.","authors":"Quan Lu, Sidney Spencer, Anita Jeyakumar","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Review the properties, safety, and artifacts of current cochlear implants (CI) with freely rotatable magnets during MRI scans.</p><p><strong>Databases reviewed: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science; last accessed September 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was BSMH IRB exempted. MESH term \"magnetic resonance imaging\" and phrases of \"Med-el Synchrony,\" \"Cochlear Nucleus Profile Plus,\" \"Advanced Bionics HiRes Ultra 3D,\" \"rotatable magnet cochlear,\" \"rotatable magnet,\" \"diametric magnet,\" \"diametric magnet cochlear implant,\" and \"MRI-safe cochlear implant\" using \"AND\" function. Non-English, non-human, non-implanted CI, and cadaveric studies were excluded. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and quality of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 18 studies. Fifteen assessed pain as a complication, with two reporting its occurrence: two cases for Synchrony and one for Ultra 3D. Demagnetization did not occur in the 12 studies that reported on it. One magnet displacement was noted with the Ultra 3D implant out of the 16 reporting studies. Artifacts were reported by 11 studies, with most scans retaining most to limited diagnostic usability. One Synchrony device required explantation due to artifact, and one was explanted before MRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Of the CI models reviewed with diametric magnets, Med-El Synchrony may enable MRI usage with fewer safety concerns when following the manufacturer's recommendations. However, clinical reports of freely rotatable CI safety during MRI scans are sparse and contain incomplete data. MRI artifacts from CI still pose concerns for image quality but can be minimized with appropriate implant location and scanning protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004556","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Review the properties, safety, and artifacts of current cochlear implants (CI) with freely rotatable magnets during MRI scans.

Databases reviewed: PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science; last accessed September 2023.

Methods: The study was BSMH IRB exempted. MESH term "magnetic resonance imaging" and phrases of "Med-el Synchrony," "Cochlear Nucleus Profile Plus," "Advanced Bionics HiRes Ultra 3D," "rotatable magnet cochlear," "rotatable magnet," "diametric magnet," "diametric magnet cochlear implant," and "MRI-safe cochlear implant" using "AND" function. Non-English, non-human, non-implanted CI, and cadaveric studies were excluded. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and quality of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE criteria.

Results: The review included 18 studies. Fifteen assessed pain as a complication, with two reporting its occurrence: two cases for Synchrony and one for Ultra 3D. Demagnetization did not occur in the 12 studies that reported on it. One magnet displacement was noted with the Ultra 3D implant out of the 16 reporting studies. Artifacts were reported by 11 studies, with most scans retaining most to limited diagnostic usability. One Synchrony device required explantation due to artifact, and one was explanted before MRI.

Conclusion: Of the CI models reviewed with diametric magnets, Med-El Synchrony may enable MRI usage with fewer safety concerns when following the manufacturer's recommendations. However, clinical reports of freely rotatable CI safety during MRI scans are sparse and contain incomplete data. MRI artifacts from CI still pose concerns for image quality but can be minimized with appropriate implant location and scanning protocols.

磁共振成像对直径磁铁人工耳蜗影响的系统综述。
目的:回顾目前人工耳蜗可自由旋转磁体的MRI扫描特性、安全性和伪影。数据库综述:PubMed、Cochrane和Web of Science;最后一次访问是在2023年9月。方法:本研究通过BSMH IRB豁免。MESH术语“磁共振成像”和短语“Med-el Synchrony”,“耳蜗核轮廓Plus”,“Advanced Bionics HiRes Ultra 3D”,“可旋转磁铁耳蜗”,“可旋转磁铁”,“直径磁铁”,“直径磁铁耳蜗植入”和“mri安全耳蜗植入”使用“and”功能。排除了非英语、非人类、非植入CI和尸体研究。使用混合方法评估工具评估方法学质量,使用GRADE标准评估证据质量。结果:纳入18项研究。15例评估疼痛为并发症,2例报告其发生:2例为同步,1例为Ultra 3D。在12项有关消磁的研究中,消磁并没有发生。在16个报告的研究中,Ultra 3D植入物发现了一个磁铁位移。11项研究报告了伪影,大多数扫描保留了大多数有限的诊断可用性。一个同步装置因伪影需要移出,一个在MRI前移出。结论:在使用直径磁铁的CI模型中,Med-El Synchrony可以在遵循制造商建议的情况下使MRI使用的安全性降低。然而,在MRI扫描中自由旋转CI安全性的临床报告很少,并且包含不完整的数据。CI产生的MRI伪影仍然会影响图像质量,但可以通过适当的植入物位置和扫描方案将其最小化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信