Development and First Evaluation of a Spatial Auditory Training Program for SSD Cochlear Implant Users.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-02 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004557
Benjamin Lentz, Rainer Martin, Lorena Weber, Christiane Völter
{"title":"Development and First Evaluation of a Spatial Auditory Training Program for SSD Cochlear Implant Users.","authors":"Benjamin Lentz, Rainer Martin, Lorena Weber, Christiane Völter","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cochlear implants (CIs) allow single-sided deafness (SSD) patients to regain hearing on both sides. However, current rehabilitation programs primarily focus on speech perception, leaving a significant gap in spatial hearing abilities compared with normal-hearing individuals. In this study, we developed and evaluated a novel method for training spatial hearing abilities in SSD CI users.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve SSD CI patients underwent a 4-week training program. Twice a week, subjects completed training sessions of approximately 30 minutes, each involving 50 stimuli presented by 7 loudspeakers arranged from -90 to +90 degrees in the horizontal plane. Spatial hearing was evaluated before and after training using the root mean square error (RMSE), the mean absolute error (MAE), and the bias of source location angles, and by the Speech, Spatial and Quality of Hearing Scale (SSQ) questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Localization abilities assessed by MAE and by RMSE were better with CI than without ( p < 0.001), but further significantly improved after spatial auditory training (both p < 0.05), especially for signals presented from the frontal direction. Furthermore, subjective spatial hearing abilities measured by the SSQ also improved after training ( p < 0.01). Subjects with a larger pretraining bias showed a greater reduction in bias after training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A 4-week lasting spatial auditory training led to significant improvements both in subjective and in objective spatial hearing outcomes in adult SSD CI subjects. Therefore, the inclusion of such training programs in the postoperative rehabilitation setting of SSD CI patients and its evaluation in larger studies is a worthwhile next step.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":"909-917"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004557","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Cochlear implants (CIs) allow single-sided deafness (SSD) patients to regain hearing on both sides. However, current rehabilitation programs primarily focus on speech perception, leaving a significant gap in spatial hearing abilities compared with normal-hearing individuals. In this study, we developed and evaluated a novel method for training spatial hearing abilities in SSD CI users.

Methods: Twelve SSD CI patients underwent a 4-week training program. Twice a week, subjects completed training sessions of approximately 30 minutes, each involving 50 stimuli presented by 7 loudspeakers arranged from -90 to +90 degrees in the horizontal plane. Spatial hearing was evaluated before and after training using the root mean square error (RMSE), the mean absolute error (MAE), and the bias of source location angles, and by the Speech, Spatial and Quality of Hearing Scale (SSQ) questionnaire.

Results: Localization abilities assessed by MAE and by RMSE were better with CI than without ( p < 0.001), but further significantly improved after spatial auditory training (both p < 0.05), especially for signals presented from the frontal direction. Furthermore, subjective spatial hearing abilities measured by the SSQ also improved after training ( p < 0.01). Subjects with a larger pretraining bias showed a greater reduction in bias after training.

Conclusion: A 4-week lasting spatial auditory training led to significant improvements both in subjective and in objective spatial hearing outcomes in adult SSD CI subjects. Therefore, the inclusion of such training programs in the postoperative rehabilitation setting of SSD CI patients and its evaluation in larger studies is a worthwhile next step.

SSD人工耳蜗使用者空间听觉训练计划的开发与初步评估。
目的:人工耳蜗(CIs)可使单侧耳聋(SSD)患者恢复双侧听力。然而,目前的康复计划主要集中在语言感知上,与正常听力个体相比,空间听力能力存在显着差距。在这项研究中,我们开发并评估了一种训练SSD CI使用者空间听力能力的新方法。方法:12例SSD CI患者接受为期4周的训练。受试者每周完成两次约30分钟的训练,每次训练涉及50个刺激,这些刺激由7个扬声器在水平平面上以-90度到+90度排列。采用均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和声源定位角度偏差,以及语音、空间和听力质量量表(SSQ)问卷对训练前后的空间听力进行评价。结果:有CI时,MAE和RMSE评估的定位能力优于无CI时(p < 0.001),但在空间听觉训练后,定位能力进一步显著提高(p < 0.05),尤其是对来自额部方向的信号。此外,SSQ测量的主观空间听力能力在训练后也有提高(p < 0.01)。训练前偏倚较大的受试者在训练后偏倚减小得更大。结论:持续4周的空间听觉训练对成人SSD CI受试者的主观和客观空间听力结果均有显著改善。因此,将此类培训项目纳入SSD CI患者的术后康复环境并在更大规模的研究中进行评估是值得下一步研究的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信