Impact of Adding Aromatherapy to Sound Intervention on Cardiovascular Parameters and Psychophysiological Measures in Cancer Patients: A Randomized Exploratory Trial.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Anna Lena Hohneck, Melissa Troia, Valentin Kolar, Simone Weingärtner, Kirsten Merx, Felicitas Sarodnick, Athanasios Mavratzas, Iris Burkholder, Gerhard Schumacher, Wolf-Karsten Hofmann, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz
{"title":"Impact of Adding Aromatherapy to Sound Intervention on Cardiovascular Parameters and Psychophysiological Measures in Cancer Patients: A Randomized Exploratory Trial.","authors":"Anna Lena Hohneck, Melissa Troia, Valentin Kolar, Simone Weingärtner, Kirsten Merx, Felicitas Sarodnick, Athanasios Mavratzas, Iris Burkholder, Gerhard Schumacher, Wolf-Karsten Hofmann, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz","doi":"10.1159/000545932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Integrative therapeutic approaches are able to improve psychophysiological outcomes in cancer patients. Whether additional beneficial effects can be achieved by combining aromatherapy to sound intervention is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty cancer patients were randomized (1:1) to either a 20-min sound intervention (\"sound only,\" classical music via headphones) or a sound intervention combined with aromatherapy (\"aroma\"). Cardiovascular parameters (measured with VascAssist2.0), visual analogue scales for emotional well-being, anxiety, stress, pain and sadness, and the State Trait Anxiety Inventory were assessed before and after intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sound only led to a significant reduction in the heart rate, while a trend for a lower heart rate was observed in the aroma group. Both pulse wave velocity (p = 0.04) and vascular resistance (p = 0.04) were reduced by sound only. Psychophysiological outcomes were improved by both interventions with a more pronounced but not significantly different effect on pain reduction by aroma (aroma p < 0.001; sound only p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both interventions were able to improve psychophysiological outcomes. In terms of cardiovascular parameters, a sound intervention alone achieved greater but not significantly different results compared to aroma, while the addition of aromatherapy yielded no substantial additional effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545932","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Integrative therapeutic approaches are able to improve psychophysiological outcomes in cancer patients. Whether additional beneficial effects can be achieved by combining aromatherapy to sound intervention is unclear.

Methods: Eighty cancer patients were randomized (1:1) to either a 20-min sound intervention ("sound only," classical music via headphones) or a sound intervention combined with aromatherapy ("aroma"). Cardiovascular parameters (measured with VascAssist2.0), visual analogue scales for emotional well-being, anxiety, stress, pain and sadness, and the State Trait Anxiety Inventory were assessed before and after intervention.

Results: Sound only led to a significant reduction in the heart rate, while a trend for a lower heart rate was observed in the aroma group. Both pulse wave velocity (p = 0.04) and vascular resistance (p = 0.04) were reduced by sound only. Psychophysiological outcomes were improved by both interventions with a more pronounced but not significantly different effect on pain reduction by aroma (aroma p < 0.001; sound only p = 0.002).

Conclusion: Both interventions were able to improve psychophysiological outcomes. In terms of cardiovascular parameters, a sound intervention alone achieved greater but not significantly different results compared to aroma, while the addition of aromatherapy yielded no substantial additional effects.

在声音干预中加入芳香疗法对癌症患者心血管参数和心理生理指标的影响:一项随机探索性试验。
背景:综合治疗方法能够改善癌症患者的心理生理结果。芳香疗法与声音干预相结合是否能产生额外的有益效果尚不清楚。方法80例癌症患者随机(1:1)接受20分钟的声音干预(“仅声音”,通过耳机播放古典音乐)或声音干预结合芳香疗法(“香气”)。评估干预前后的心血管参数(用VascAssist2.0测量)、情绪健康、焦虑、压力、疼痛和悲伤的视觉模拟量表以及状态-特质焦虑量表。结果声音只导致心率显著降低,而在香气组中观察到心率降低的趋势。仅声音可降低脉搏波速度(p = 0.04)和血管阻力(p = 0.04)。两种干预措施均改善了心理生理结果,香气对减轻疼痛的影响更为明显,但差异不显著(香气p < 0.001;声音只有p = 0.002)。结论两种干预措施均能改善患者的心理生理结局。在心血管参数方面,与芳香相比,单独的声音干预取得了更大但没有显著差异的结果,而芳香疗法的加入没有产生实质性的额外效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信