A Current Assessment of the Use of Complementary Medicine in German Cancer Patients: The CONKO 022 Investigation.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Tobias Bleumer, Janine Abel, Lilian Bodden, Miriam Ortiz, Sebastian Stintzing, Uwe Pelzer, Lars Uwe Stephan
{"title":"A Current Assessment of the Use of Complementary Medicine in German Cancer Patients: The CONKO 022 Investigation.","authors":"Tobias Bleumer, Janine Abel, Lilian Bodden, Miriam Ortiz, Sebastian Stintzing, Uwe Pelzer, Lars Uwe Stephan","doi":"10.1159/000546767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Approximately 50% of cancer patients use practices of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). However, some of these methods may interact with oncological medication. Despite the generally increasing use of CAM in recent years, its prevalence has been studied insufficiently among cancer patients in Germany. Thus, this study aimed to assess the recent use of CAM among cancer patients, evaluate communication on CAM between patients and healthcare providers, and present an overview of the most frequently used practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted using a standardized questionnaire including 19 CAM methods as well as sociodemographic and clinical parameters. Also, aspects of communication and quality of life were assessed. Patients were surveyed between September 2022 and June 2023, involving various entities such as breast cancer, lymphoma, and gastrointestinal malignancies. Data analysis was conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test and one-factor ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 154 patients (65.5% female) were included. 88.3% of patients reported use of CAM practices either before receiving their oncological diagnosis or after or both. Out of all patients, 62.3% of patients stated to have begun using at least one CAM practice post-diagnosis. 36.6% of all patients reported to have received information on potential drug interactions by their attending physician, while 60.8% informed their physician about their use of CAM. The most frequently used CAM methods were dietary supplements, massage therapy, and yoga. Overall, female patients reported use of CAM significantly more often than males.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of CAM methods appears to be common in this sample of cancer patients. To mitigate risks associated with potential drug interactions, enhanced communication and education between patients and healthcare providers is essential. Integrating a standardized questionnaire on CAM methods into routine oncological care may improve patient safety and treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12215149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546767","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Approximately 50% of cancer patients use practices of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). However, some of these methods may interact with oncological medication. Despite the generally increasing use of CAM in recent years, its prevalence has been studied insufficiently among cancer patients in Germany. Thus, this study aimed to assess the recent use of CAM among cancer patients, evaluate communication on CAM between patients and healthcare providers, and present an overview of the most frequently used practices.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a standardized questionnaire including 19 CAM methods as well as sociodemographic and clinical parameters. Also, aspects of communication and quality of life were assessed. Patients were surveyed between September 2022 and June 2023, involving various entities such as breast cancer, lymphoma, and gastrointestinal malignancies. Data analysis was conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test and one-factor ANOVA.

Results: In total, 154 patients (65.5% female) were included. 88.3% of patients reported use of CAM practices either before receiving their oncological diagnosis or after or both. Out of all patients, 62.3% of patients stated to have begun using at least one CAM practice post-diagnosis. 36.6% of all patients reported to have received information on potential drug interactions by their attending physician, while 60.8% informed their physician about their use of CAM. The most frequently used CAM methods were dietary supplements, massage therapy, and yoga. Overall, female patients reported use of CAM significantly more often than males.

Conclusion: Use of CAM methods appears to be common in this sample of cancer patients. To mitigate risks associated with potential drug interactions, enhanced communication and education between patients and healthcare providers is essential. Integrating a standardized questionnaire on CAM methods into routine oncological care may improve patient safety and treatment outcomes.

目前对德国癌症患者使用补充药物的评估- CONKO 022调查。
简介:大约50%的癌症患者使用补充和替代医学(CAM)的做法。然而,其中一些方法可能与肿瘤药物相互作用。尽管近年来CAM的使用普遍增加,但其在德国癌症患者中的患病率研究不足。因此,本研究旨在评估癌症患者最近对辅助辅助治疗的使用情况,评估患者与医疗保健提供者之间关于辅助辅助治疗的沟通,并概述最常用的做法。方法:采用标准化问卷进行横断面研究,包括19种CAM方法以及社会人口学和临床参数。此外,还评估了交流和生活质量方面的情况。在2022年9月至2023年6月期间对患者进行了调查,涉及乳腺癌、淋巴瘤和胃肠道恶性肿瘤等各种实体。数据分析采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和单因素方差分析。结果:共纳入154例患者,其中女性占65.5%。88.3%的患者报告在接受肿瘤诊断之前或之后或两者兼而有之地使用辅助替代疗法。在所有患者中,62.3%的患者表示在诊断后开始使用至少一种CAM实践。36.6%的患者报告从其主治医生那里获得了潜在药物相互作用的信息,而60.8%的患者向其医生告知了他们使用替代药物的情况。最常用的辅助治疗方法是膳食补充剂、按摩疗法和瑜伽。总体而言,女性患者报告使用CAM的频率明显高于男性。结论:CAM方法的使用在该癌症患者样本中似乎很常见。为了减轻与潜在药物相互作用相关的风险,加强患者和医疗保健提供者之间的沟通和教育是必不可少的。将CAM方法的标准化问卷纳入常规肿瘤护理可以提高患者的安全性和治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信