Postoperative Pain Management Strategies Following Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM): A Review.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-05-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S511019
Jun Lu, Wentao Ji, Chao Sang, Zhi Wang, Lulong Bo
{"title":"Postoperative Pain Management Strategies Following Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM): A Review.","authors":"Jun Lu, Wentao Ji, Chao Sang, Zhi Wang, Lulong Bo","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S511019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) is a minimally invasive procedure for treating esophageal achalasia, but effective postoperative pain management remains a challenge. Pain following POEM is multifactorial, arising from mechanical, chemical, and thermal stimuli that activate nociceptive and neuropathic pain pathways. A multimodal analgesia approach, combining opioids, non-opioid analgesics, and regional anesthesia, is currently the most effective strategy. Opioids remain a cornerstone of pain management, but their side effects, such as nausea and constipation, highlight the need for alternatives. Non-opioid analgesics, including acetaminophen, COX-2 inhibitors, and magnesium, have shown promise in reducing pain and opioid use. Regional anesthesia techniques, such as thoracic paravertebral blocks and erector spinae plane blocks, have been explored, though their efficacy in POEM remains inconclusive. Despite advances, there are ongoing challenges in standardizing pain management protocols. Variability in clinical practices and limited high-quality research with small sample sizes complicate the development of universally applicable guidelines. Additionally, while current research primarily focuses on acute postoperative pain, long-term outcomes, such as chronic pain and quality of life, require further investigation. Addressing these gaps in knowledge will be key to improving pain management practices and optimizing recovery for POEM patients. Future studies should focus on refining multimodal analgesia strategies, exploring new analgesic agents, and evaluating long-term pain management outcomes to enhance patient care and improve clinical results.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"2761-2773"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12135955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S511019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) is a minimally invasive procedure for treating esophageal achalasia, but effective postoperative pain management remains a challenge. Pain following POEM is multifactorial, arising from mechanical, chemical, and thermal stimuli that activate nociceptive and neuropathic pain pathways. A multimodal analgesia approach, combining opioids, non-opioid analgesics, and regional anesthesia, is currently the most effective strategy. Opioids remain a cornerstone of pain management, but their side effects, such as nausea and constipation, highlight the need for alternatives. Non-opioid analgesics, including acetaminophen, COX-2 inhibitors, and magnesium, have shown promise in reducing pain and opioid use. Regional anesthesia techniques, such as thoracic paravertebral blocks and erector spinae plane blocks, have been explored, though their efficacy in POEM remains inconclusive. Despite advances, there are ongoing challenges in standardizing pain management protocols. Variability in clinical practices and limited high-quality research with small sample sizes complicate the development of universally applicable guidelines. Additionally, while current research primarily focuses on acute postoperative pain, long-term outcomes, such as chronic pain and quality of life, require further investigation. Addressing these gaps in knowledge will be key to improving pain management practices and optimizing recovery for POEM patients. Future studies should focus on refining multimodal analgesia strategies, exploring new analgesic agents, and evaluating long-term pain management outcomes to enhance patient care and improve clinical results.

经口内窥镜下肌切开术(POEM)术后疼痛管理策略综述。
经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)是治疗食管贲门失弛缓症的一种微创手术,但有效的术后疼痛管理仍然是一个挑战。POEM引起的疼痛是多因素的,由机械、化学和热刺激引起,这些刺激激活了伤害性和神经性疼痛通路。阿片类药物、非阿片类药物和区域麻醉相结合的多模式镇痛方法是目前最有效的策略。阿片类药物仍然是疼痛管理的基石,但其副作用,如恶心和便秘,突出了替代品的必要性。非阿片类镇痛药,包括对乙酰氨基酚、COX-2抑制剂和镁,已显示出减轻疼痛和阿片类药物使用的希望。区域麻醉技术,如胸椎旁阻滞和竖脊平面阻滞,已经被探索,尽管它们在POEM中的疗效仍不确定。尽管取得了进步,但在标准化疼痛管理协议方面仍存在挑战。临床实践的可变性和有限的小样本量高质量研究使普遍适用指南的制定复杂化。此外,虽然目前的研究主要集中在急性术后疼痛,但长期结果,如慢性疼痛和生活质量,需要进一步研究。解决这些知识上的差距将是改善疼痛管理实践和优化POEM患者康复的关键。未来的研究应侧重于完善多模式镇痛策略,探索新的镇痛药物,评估长期疼痛管理结果,以加强患者护理和改善临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信