{"title":"Bone cement distribution patterns in vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review.","authors":"Kangjia Yang, Xingyu Zhu, Xiaopeng Sun, Hang Shi, Lixuan Sun, Hua Ding","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05868-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are common in osteoporosis patients. Vertebral augmentation procedures like percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) are widely used, but the impact of bone cement distribution patterns on treatment efficacy remains unclear, and there is a lack of unified classification criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CENTRAL until September 30, 2024. Studies on OVCF patients who underwent vertebral augmentation, described cement distribution patterns, and provided clinical data were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed following PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening 408 papers, 21 studies with 3997 patients were included. Morphological classifications showed that a diffuse spongy distribution pattern was associated with better clinical outcomes. Directional classifications indicated that bilateral and even cement distribution led to better vertebral height restoration and pain relief. Sufficient cement distribution was crucial for treatment success, and cement contact with both upper and lower endplates reduced refracture risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cement distribution patterns significantly affect OVCF treatment efficacy. Current classifications lack standardization, necessitating objective assessment tools and large-scale studies to optimize surgical techniques and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"568"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12135570/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05868-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are common in osteoporosis patients. Vertebral augmentation procedures like percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) are widely used, but the impact of bone cement distribution patterns on treatment efficacy remains unclear, and there is a lack of unified classification criteria.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted in multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CENTRAL until September 30, 2024. Studies on OVCF patients who underwent vertebral augmentation, described cement distribution patterns, and provided clinical data were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed following PRISMA guidelines.
Results: After screening 408 papers, 21 studies with 3997 patients were included. Morphological classifications showed that a diffuse spongy distribution pattern was associated with better clinical outcomes. Directional classifications indicated that bilateral and even cement distribution led to better vertebral height restoration and pain relief. Sufficient cement distribution was crucial for treatment success, and cement contact with both upper and lower endplates reduced refracture risk.
Conclusions: Cement distribution patterns significantly affect OVCF treatment efficacy. Current classifications lack standardization, necessitating objective assessment tools and large-scale studies to optimize surgical techniques and patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues.
Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications.
JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.