Bone cement distribution patterns in vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Kangjia Yang, Xingyu Zhu, Xiaopeng Sun, Hang Shi, Lixuan Sun, Hua Ding
{"title":"Bone cement distribution patterns in vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review.","authors":"Kangjia Yang, Xingyu Zhu, Xiaopeng Sun, Hang Shi, Lixuan Sun, Hua Ding","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05868-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are common in osteoporosis patients. Vertebral augmentation procedures like percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) are widely used, but the impact of bone cement distribution patterns on treatment efficacy remains unclear, and there is a lack of unified classification criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CENTRAL until September 30, 2024. Studies on OVCF patients who underwent vertebral augmentation, described cement distribution patterns, and provided clinical data were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed following PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening 408 papers, 21 studies with 3997 patients were included. Morphological classifications showed that a diffuse spongy distribution pattern was associated with better clinical outcomes. Directional classifications indicated that bilateral and even cement distribution led to better vertebral height restoration and pain relief. Sufficient cement distribution was crucial for treatment success, and cement contact with both upper and lower endplates reduced refracture risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cement distribution patterns significantly affect OVCF treatment efficacy. Current classifications lack standardization, necessitating objective assessment tools and large-scale studies to optimize surgical techniques and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"568"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12135570/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05868-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are common in osteoporosis patients. Vertebral augmentation procedures like percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) are widely used, but the impact of bone cement distribution patterns on treatment efficacy remains unclear, and there is a lack of unified classification criteria.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CENTRAL until September 30, 2024. Studies on OVCF patients who underwent vertebral augmentation, described cement distribution patterns, and provided clinical data were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed following PRISMA guidelines.

Results: After screening 408 papers, 21 studies with 3997 patients were included. Morphological classifications showed that a diffuse spongy distribution pattern was associated with better clinical outcomes. Directional classifications indicated that bilateral and even cement distribution led to better vertebral height restoration and pain relief. Sufficient cement distribution was crucial for treatment success, and cement contact with both upper and lower endplates reduced refracture risk.

Conclusions: Cement distribution patterns significantly affect OVCF treatment efficacy. Current classifications lack standardization, necessitating objective assessment tools and large-scale studies to optimize surgical techniques and patient outcomes.

骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折椎体增强术中的骨水泥分布模式:系统综述。
背景:骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCFs)在骨质疏松症患者中很常见。椎体增强手术如经皮椎体成形术(percutaneous vertebroplasty, PVP)和经皮后凸成形术(percutaneous kyphoplasty, PKP)被广泛应用,但骨水泥分布模式对治疗效果的影响尚不清楚,且缺乏统一的分类标准。方法:系统检索PubMed、Web of Science、EMBASE、CENTRAL等多个数据库,检索截止日期为2024年9月30日。对OVCF患者行椎体增强术的研究,描述了骨水泥分布模式,并提供了临床数据。数据提取和质量评估按照PRISMA指南进行。结果:在筛选408篇论文后,纳入21项研究,共3997例患者。形态学分类显示弥漫性海绵状分布模式与较好的临床结果相关。定向分类表明,双侧和均匀的骨水泥分布可以更好地恢复椎体高度和缓解疼痛。充分的水泥分布对治疗成功至关重要,水泥与上下终板的接触降低了再骨折的风险。结论:骨水泥分布方式显著影响OVCF治疗效果。目前的分类缺乏标准化,需要客观的评估工具和大规模的研究来优化手术技术和患者的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信