Transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with lipiodol chemoembolization for advanced gastric fundus and cardia cancer with obstruction.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Jiajia Zhang, Gang Zhou, Meipan Yin, Yishu Ma, Wei He, Yonghua Bi, Gang Wu
{"title":"Transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with lipiodol chemoembolization for advanced gastric fundus and cardia cancer with obstruction.","authors":"Jiajia Zhang, Gang Zhou, Meipan Yin, Yishu Ma, Wei He, Yonghua Bi, Gang Wu","doi":"10.1007/s00432-025-06169-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Gastric fundus and cardia cancer are increasingly common, diagnosed at a late stage, often with severe obstruction, and have a poor prognosis. Transcatheter arterial lipiodol chemoembolization (TACE) is rarely used for gastric cancer. This single-center retrospective study aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy (TAI) combined with TACE in advanced gastric fundus and cardia cancer with obstruction and compare it to bland embolization (BE).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The clinical efficacy of TAI-TACE was evaluated through technical and clinical success rates, obstruction relief, tumor response, overall survival (OS), and postoperative adverse events. TAI-TACE and TAI-BE efficacies were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 53 patients (age 70.0 ± 11.1 years, 38 males). Thirty-two patients underwent TAI-TACE, and 21 underwent TAI-BE. The cohort's technical success rate was 100%. The pre- and post-intervention median Stooler grades were 4 and 2 in the TAI-TACE group and 3 and 3 in the TAI-BE group, respectively. Compared to the TAI-BE group, the TAI-TACE group had a higher clinical success rate (78.1%, 25/32 vs. 42.9%, 9/21; P = 0.009), a better objective response rate (53.1% vs. 38.1%; P = 0.016), and a longer median OS (13.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.2-22.8 vs. 10.0; 95% CI, 8.5-11.5; P = 0.039) months. All adverse events were grade 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TAI-TACE interventional therapy scheme was safe and effective, achieving rapid tumor shrinkage, obstructive symptom alleviation, improved quality of life, and a significantly better overall effect than TAI-BE.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":"151 6","pages":"183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12137502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06169-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Gastric fundus and cardia cancer are increasingly common, diagnosed at a late stage, often with severe obstruction, and have a poor prognosis. Transcatheter arterial lipiodol chemoembolization (TACE) is rarely used for gastric cancer. This single-center retrospective study aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy (TAI) combined with TACE in advanced gastric fundus and cardia cancer with obstruction and compare it to bland embolization (BE).

Materials and methods: The clinical efficacy of TAI-TACE was evaluated through technical and clinical success rates, obstruction relief, tumor response, overall survival (OS), and postoperative adverse events. TAI-TACE and TAI-BE efficacies were compared.

Results: The study included 53 patients (age 70.0 ± 11.1 years, 38 males). Thirty-two patients underwent TAI-TACE, and 21 underwent TAI-BE. The cohort's technical success rate was 100%. The pre- and post-intervention median Stooler grades were 4 and 2 in the TAI-TACE group and 3 and 3 in the TAI-BE group, respectively. Compared to the TAI-BE group, the TAI-TACE group had a higher clinical success rate (78.1%, 25/32 vs. 42.9%, 9/21; P = 0.009), a better objective response rate (53.1% vs. 38.1%; P = 0.016), and a longer median OS (13.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.2-22.8 vs. 10.0; 95% CI, 8.5-11.5; P = 0.039) months. All adverse events were grade 1.

Conclusion: The TAI-TACE interventional therapy scheme was safe and effective, achieving rapid tumor shrinkage, obstructive symptom alleviation, improved quality of life, and a significantly better overall effect than TAI-BE.

经导管动脉灌注化疗联合脂醇化疗栓塞治疗晚期胃底贲门癌合并梗阻。
目的:胃底贲门癌越来越常见,诊断较晚,常伴有严重梗阻,预后较差。经导管动脉脂醇化学栓塞术(TACE)很少用于胃癌。本单中心回顾性研究旨在分析经导管动脉灌注化疗(TAI)联合TACE治疗晚期胃底贲门癌合并梗阻的疗效和安全性,并与温和栓塞(BE)进行比较。材料和方法:通过技术和临床成功率、阻塞缓解、肿瘤反应、总生存期(OS)和术后不良事件评价TAI-TACE的临床疗效。比较TAI-TACE和TAI-BE的疗效。结果:纳入53例患者(年龄70.0±11.1岁,男性38例)。32例患者行TAI-TACE, 21例行TAI-BE。该队列的技术成功率为100%。干预前和干预后的Stooler评分中位数在TAI-TACE组分别为4和2,在TAI-BE组分别为3和3。与TAI-BE组相比,TAI-TACE组的临床成功率更高(78.1%,25/32 vs 42.9%, 9/21;P = 0.009),客观有效率更高(53.1% vs. 38.1%;P = 0.016),中位OS较长(13.0;95%置信区间(CI), 3.2 ~ 22.8 vs. 10.0;95% ci, 8.5-11.5;P = 0.039)个月。所有不良事件均为1级。结论:TAI-TACE介入治疗方案安全有效,肿瘤迅速缩小,梗阻症状缓解,生活质量提高,整体效果明显优于TAI-BE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
577
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses. The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信