Intensive care infection score: ICIS discriminates between infected and uninfected critically ill patients in routine intensive care unit practice.

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Emre Deniz, Stefanie Klatte, Nilgün Tekin-Bubenheim, Mathias Zimmermann
{"title":"Intensive care infection score: ICIS discriminates between infected and uninfected critically ill patients in routine intensive care unit practice.","authors":"Emre Deniz, Stefanie Klatte, Nilgün Tekin-Bubenheim, Mathias Zimmermann","doi":"10.1186/s40635-025-00767-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosis of infectious inflammation is challenging as acute phase protein expression is nonspecific, limiting the utility of well-established biomarkers, such as procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP). The emergent blood cell-derived Intensive Care Infection Score (ICIS) is an innovative approach for the sensitive and specific diagnosis of infection in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This study aimed to confirm the suitability of routine ICIS use in various ICU settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 115 patients from three ICUs. Seventy-five patients were diagnosed as infected and 40 as uninfected. ICIS, CRP, and PCT were compared to routine clinical assessment to evaluate their effectiveness in predicting infection in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ICIS was superior to CRP and PCT in discriminating infection from no infection on day 1 in the ICU. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, ICIS exhibited an AUC = 0.984, sensitivity of 90.7%, specificity of 97.5%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 97.7% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 89.9%, by the best cutoff value of 3. CRP gave an AUC = 0.727, PPV of 70.0% and NPV of 67.8% by best cutoff value of 8.3 mg/L with a sensitivity of 74.7% and specificity of 62.5%. The best cutoff value of 0.9 ng/mL was calculated for PCT with an AUC = 0.812, PPV of 84.4%, NPV of 70.3%, sensitivity of 69.3% and specificity of 85.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICIS outperformed CRP and PCT in identifying infection in critically ill patients across different ICU settings on the first day in the ICU. The high NPV emphasizes the potential of ICIS as an adjuvant tool to rule out infections thereby facilitating the reduction of antibiotic overuse and consequently limiting antimicrobial resistance (AMR) development. ICIS appears suitable for routine implementation in various ICU settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"13 1","pages":"58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12141177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00767-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of infectious inflammation is challenging as acute phase protein expression is nonspecific, limiting the utility of well-established biomarkers, such as procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP). The emergent blood cell-derived Intensive Care Infection Score (ICIS) is an innovative approach for the sensitive and specific diagnosis of infection in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This study aimed to confirm the suitability of routine ICIS use in various ICU settings.

Methods: This retrospective study included 115 patients from three ICUs. Seventy-five patients were diagnosed as infected and 40 as uninfected. ICIS, CRP, and PCT were compared to routine clinical assessment to evaluate their effectiveness in predicting infection in critically ill patients.

Results: ICIS was superior to CRP and PCT in discriminating infection from no infection on day 1 in the ICU. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, ICIS exhibited an AUC = 0.984, sensitivity of 90.7%, specificity of 97.5%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 97.7% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 89.9%, by the best cutoff value of 3. CRP gave an AUC = 0.727, PPV of 70.0% and NPV of 67.8% by best cutoff value of 8.3 mg/L with a sensitivity of 74.7% and specificity of 62.5%. The best cutoff value of 0.9 ng/mL was calculated for PCT with an AUC = 0.812, PPV of 84.4%, NPV of 70.3%, sensitivity of 69.3% and specificity of 85.0%.

Conclusions: ICIS outperformed CRP and PCT in identifying infection in critically ill patients across different ICU settings on the first day in the ICU. The high NPV emphasizes the potential of ICIS as an adjuvant tool to rule out infections thereby facilitating the reduction of antibiotic overuse and consequently limiting antimicrobial resistance (AMR) development. ICIS appears suitable for routine implementation in various ICU settings.

重症监护感染评分:ICIS在常规重症监护病房实践中区分感染和未感染的危重病人。
背景:感染性炎症的诊断是具有挑战性的,因为急性期蛋白表达是非特异性的,限制了现有生物标志物的应用,如降钙素原(PCT)和c反应蛋白(CRP)。紧急血细胞衍生重症监护感染评分(ICIS)是一种对重症监护病房(ICU)患者感染进行敏感和特异性诊断的创新方法。本研究旨在确认常规ICIS在不同ICU环境下的适用性。方法:本回顾性研究包括来自3个icu的115例患者。75名患者被诊断为感染,40名患者未被感染。将ICIS、CRP和PCT与常规临床评估进行比较,评价其预测危重患者感染的有效性。结果:ICIS在ICU第1天区分感染与非感染的能力优于CRP和PCT。在受试者工作特征曲线分析中,ICIS的AUC = 0.984,灵敏度为90.7%,特异性为97.5%,阳性预测值(PPV)为97.7%,阴性预测值(NPV)为89.9%,最佳截断值为3。CRP的最佳临界值为8.3 mg/L, AUC = 0.727, PPV为70.0%,NPV为67.8%,敏感性为74.7%,特异性为62.5%。PCT的最佳截断值为0.9 ng/mL, AUC = 0.812, PPV为84.4%,NPV为70.3%,敏感性为69.3%,特异性为85.0%。结论:ICIS在不同ICU环境的危重患者入住第一天识别感染方面优于CRP和PCT。高净现值强调了ICIS作为排除感染的辅助工具的潜力,从而促进减少抗生素的过度使用,从而限制抗菌素耐药性(AMR)的发展。ICIS似乎适合在各种ICU环境中常规实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信