Lack of Altitude Medicine Knowledge Among Mountaineers in the Italian Alps.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Remco R Berendsen, Dirk C A A de Vries, Alea Steger, Nadine Herold, Feico J J Halbertsma, Adriaan F Norbart, Hannes Gatterer, Bengt Kayser
{"title":"Lack of Altitude Medicine Knowledge Among Mountaineers in the Italian Alps.","authors":"Remco R Berendsen, Dirk C A A de Vries, Alea Steger, Nadine Herold, Feico J J Halbertsma, Adriaan F Norbart, Hannes Gatterer, Bengt Kayser","doi":"10.1089/ham.2025.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Berendsen, Remco R., Dirk C A.A. de Vries, Alea Steger, Nadine Herold, Feico J.J. Halbertsma, Adriaan F. Norbart, Hannes Gatterer, and Bengt Kayser. Lack of altitude medicine knowledge among mountaineers in the Italian Alps. <i>High Alt Med Biol.</i> 00:00-00, 2025. <b><i>Introduction:</i></b> In 2022, expert consensus defined a set of minimum altitude medicine knowledge statements for laypersons traveling to high altitudes (STAK: strengthening altitude knowledge). We used these statements to assess knowledge among mountaineers in the Italian Alps. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Mountaineers in a hut (3,647 m) completed an online STAK-based questionnaire, also indicating their confidence after each answer. A score of ≥19/28 was used as a statistical threshold, exceeding chance alone. Logistic regression assessed the link between confidence and correctness; multivariate regression explored demographic, educational, and behavioral predictors of achieving an above-threshold score. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 576 participants, 412 (72%) were included in the final analysis and 115 (28%) scored ≥19. Among them, 59% of medical professionals, 36% of mountain guides, and 23% of general participants reached the threshold; the medical professionals scored significantly higher than the general participants (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Both being a mountain guide (odds ratios [OR]: 2.3, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.0-5.0, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and being a medical professional (OR: 4.5, 95% CI: 2.1-10.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were associated with higher scores. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Using STAK as a benchmark, we found a substantial lack of altitude medicine knowledge in mountaineers, even among guides and medical professionals. These findings suggest a potential for targeted educational interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12975,"journal":{"name":"High altitude medicine & biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"High altitude medicine & biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2025.0028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Berendsen, Remco R., Dirk C A.A. de Vries, Alea Steger, Nadine Herold, Feico J.J. Halbertsma, Adriaan F. Norbart, Hannes Gatterer, and Bengt Kayser. Lack of altitude medicine knowledge among mountaineers in the Italian Alps. High Alt Med Biol. 00:00-00, 2025. Introduction: In 2022, expert consensus defined a set of minimum altitude medicine knowledge statements for laypersons traveling to high altitudes (STAK: strengthening altitude knowledge). We used these statements to assess knowledge among mountaineers in the Italian Alps. Methods: Mountaineers in a hut (3,647 m) completed an online STAK-based questionnaire, also indicating their confidence after each answer. A score of ≥19/28 was used as a statistical threshold, exceeding chance alone. Logistic regression assessed the link between confidence and correctness; multivariate regression explored demographic, educational, and behavioral predictors of achieving an above-threshold score. Results: Of 576 participants, 412 (72%) were included in the final analysis and 115 (28%) scored ≥19. Among them, 59% of medical professionals, 36% of mountain guides, and 23% of general participants reached the threshold; the medical professionals scored significantly higher than the general participants (p < 0.001). Both being a mountain guide (odds ratios [OR]: 2.3, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.0-5.0, p < 0.05) and being a medical professional (OR: 4.5, 95% CI: 2.1-10.0, p < 0.001) were associated with higher scores. Conclusion: Using STAK as a benchmark, we found a substantial lack of altitude medicine knowledge in mountaineers, even among guides and medical professionals. These findings suggest a potential for targeted educational interventions.

意大利阿尔卑斯山区登山者缺乏高原医学知识。
Berendsen, Remco R., Dirk C A.A. de Vries, Alea Steger, Nadine Herold, Feico J.J. Halbertsma, Adriaan F. Norbart, Hannes Gatterer和Bengt Kayser。意大利阿尔卑斯山区登山者缺乏高原医学知识。高Alt医学生物杂志,200,2025。导读:2022年,专家共识定义了一套适用于外行人高海拔旅行的最低海拔医学知识声明(STAK:强化海拔知识)。我们用这些陈述来评估意大利阿尔卑斯山的登山者的知识。方法:在一个小屋里(3647米)的登山者完成了一份基于stakes的在线问卷,并在每次回答后表明他们的信心。评分≥19/28作为统计阈值,超过单独的偶然性。逻辑回归评估置信度与正确性之间的联系;多元回归探讨了达到阈值以上分数的人口统计学、教育和行为预测因素。结果:576名受试者中,412名(72%)纳入最终分析,115名(28%)得分≥19分。其中,59%的医疗专业人员、36%的山地向导和23%的普通参与者达到了阈值;医学专业人员得分明显高于普通参与者(p < 0.001)。山地向导(比值比[OR]: 2.3, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.0-5.0, p < 0.05)和医学专业人员(比值比[OR]: 4.5, 95% CI: 2.1-10.0, p < 0.001)与较高得分相关。结论:以STAK为基准,我们发现登山者,甚至在导游和医疗专业人员中,高原医学知识严重缺乏。这些发现表明有针对性的教育干预的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
High altitude medicine & biology
High altitude medicine & biology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: High Altitude Medicine & Biology is the only peer-reviewed journal covering the medical and biological issues that impact human life at high altitudes. The Journal delivers critical findings on the impact of high altitude on lung and heart disease, appetite and weight loss, pulmonary and cerebral edema, hypertension, dehydration, infertility, and other diseases. It covers the full spectrum of high altitude life sciences from pathology to human and animal ecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信