Assessing the Environmental Sustainability of Gel Electromembrane Extraction Approaches: A Critical Evaluation of the Greenness.

IF 4.2 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Niluh Indria Wardani, Thidarat Samkumpim, Untika Pengsomjit, Mohamed Aly Saad Aly, Nur Nadhirah Mohamad Zain, Waleed Alahmad
{"title":"Assessing the Environmental Sustainability of Gel Electromembrane Extraction Approaches: A Critical Evaluation of the Greenness.","authors":"Niluh Indria Wardani, Thidarat Samkumpim, Untika Pengsomjit, Mohamed Aly Saad Aly, Nur Nadhirah Mohamad Zain, Waleed Alahmad","doi":"10.1080/10408347.2025.2513012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review evaluates gel electromembrane extraction (G-EME) as an environmentally friendly alternative to conventional extraction methods. By replacing hazardous organic solvents with biodegradable gels, such as agarose, agar, polyacrylamide, and chitosan, G-EME adheres to the core principles of green analytical chemistry, significantly reducing waste production. The review systematically compares various G-EME approaches-including conventional, miniaturized, additive-enhanced, and sensing modalities-using a suite of greenness assessment tools (NEMI, ESA, complexGAPI, AGREE, AGREEprep, and Hexagon-CALIFICAMET) to provide a comprehensive evaluation of their environmental impact. Key findings indicate that while traditional G-EME methods offer substantial improvements over older techniques, further advancements through miniaturization and incorporation of functional additives can lead to even greater sustainability and analytical performance. However, challenges such as limited extraction efficiency for certain analytes and the need for broader application scopes persist. This review not only highlights the current state of G-EME but also identifies critical research gaps and encourages the development of more versatile and sustainable G-EME strategies for diverse analytical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":10744,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2025.2513012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review evaluates gel electromembrane extraction (G-EME) as an environmentally friendly alternative to conventional extraction methods. By replacing hazardous organic solvents with biodegradable gels, such as agarose, agar, polyacrylamide, and chitosan, G-EME adheres to the core principles of green analytical chemistry, significantly reducing waste production. The review systematically compares various G-EME approaches-including conventional, miniaturized, additive-enhanced, and sensing modalities-using a suite of greenness assessment tools (NEMI, ESA, complexGAPI, AGREE, AGREEprep, and Hexagon-CALIFICAMET) to provide a comprehensive evaluation of their environmental impact. Key findings indicate that while traditional G-EME methods offer substantial improvements over older techniques, further advancements through miniaturization and incorporation of functional additives can lead to even greater sustainability and analytical performance. However, challenges such as limited extraction efficiency for certain analytes and the need for broader application scopes persist. This review not only highlights the current state of G-EME but also identifies critical research gaps and encourages the development of more versatile and sustainable G-EME strategies for diverse analytical applications.

评估凝胶电膜萃取方法的环境可持续性:绿色的关键评价。
本文评价了凝胶电膜萃取(G-EME)作为传统萃取方法的一种环境友好的替代方法。G-EME坚持绿色分析化学的核心原则,用琼脂糖、琼脂、聚丙烯酰胺和壳聚糖等可生物降解的凝胶代替有害的有机溶剂,显著减少废物的产生。该综述系统地比较了各种G-EME方法,包括常规、小型化、添加剂增强和传感模式,并使用一套绿色评估工具(NEMI、ESA、complexGAPI、AGREE、AGREEprep和Hexagon-CALIFICAMET)对其环境影响进行了全面评估。主要研究结果表明,虽然传统的G-EME方法比旧技术有了很大的改进,但通过小型化和加入功能性添加剂的进一步进步可以带来更大的可持续性和分析性能。然而,某些分析物的萃取效率有限以及需要更广泛的应用范围等挑战仍然存在。这篇综述不仅强调了G-EME的现状,还指出了关键的研究空白,并鼓励开发更通用和可持续的G-EME策略,用于各种分析应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry continues to be a dependable resource for both the expert and the student by providing in-depth, scholarly, insightful reviews of important topics within the discipline of analytical chemistry and related measurement sciences. The journal exclusively publishes review articles that illuminate the underlying science, that evaluate the field''s status by putting recent developments into proper perspective and context, and that speculate on possible future developments. A limited number of articles are of a "tutorial" format written by experts for scientists seeking introduction or clarification in a new area. This journal serves as a forum for linking various underlying components in broad and interdisciplinary means, while maintaining balance between applied and fundamental research. Topics we are interested in receiving reviews on are the following: · chemical analysis; · instrumentation; · chemometrics; · analytical biochemistry; · medicinal analysis; · forensics; · environmental sciences; · applied physics; · and material science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信