Evaluation of Glove Liners Made of Semipermeable and Textile Materials in Patients With Hand Dermatoses: Results of a Multicenter Intervention Study (ProTection II).

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Theres Heichel, Jan F Kersten, Antje Braumann, Kathrin Krambeck, Sonja Bonness, Claudia Schröder-Kraft, Robert Ofenloch, Elke Weisshaar, Kerstin Strom, Christoph Skudlik, Flora Sonsmann, Annika Wilke, Albert Nienhaus, Swen Malte John, Richard Brans
{"title":"Evaluation of Glove Liners Made of Semipermeable and Textile Materials in Patients With Hand Dermatoses: Results of a Multicenter Intervention Study (ProTection II).","authors":"Theres Heichel, Jan F Kersten, Antje Braumann, Kathrin Krambeck, Sonja Bonness, Claudia Schröder-Kraft, Robert Ofenloch, Elke Weisshaar, Kerstin Strom, Christoph Skudlik, Flora Sonsmann, Annika Wilke, Albert Nienhaus, Swen Malte John, Richard Brans","doi":"10.1111/cod.14822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glove liners (GLs) are worn under impermeable gloves to prevent occlusion effects.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the acceptance and tolerability of cotton gloves (COT) and semipermeable Sympatex gloves (SYM) as GLs in patients with hand dermatoses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective multicenter study, 210 patients with work-related hand dermatoses were invited to wear either COT or SYM as GLs for 4 weeks underneath occlusive protective gloves during their regular work tasks. Acceptance of GL and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were assessed by questionnaires and the disease severity by the Osnabrueck Hand Eczema Severity Index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 178 data sets were available (SYM: n = 89/103, 86.4%; COT: n = 89/107, 83.2%). Both GLs did not impair work performance and were applicable in various work activities. SYM received better ratings regarding climate conditions, mobility and tactility. COT showed superiority in fit, donning and doffing. No substantial intergroup differences regarding disease severity and HRQoL were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SYM and COT were well tolerated and accepted, suggesting that SYM is a reasonable alternative for COT as GL in patients with hand dermatoses. The choice of material of GLs may depend on occupation-specific requirements for the performed tasks, individual needs and preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":10527,"journal":{"name":"Contact Dermatitis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Dermatitis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14822","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Glove liners (GLs) are worn under impermeable gloves to prevent occlusion effects.

Objectives: To evaluate the acceptance and tolerability of cotton gloves (COT) and semipermeable Sympatex gloves (SYM) as GLs in patients with hand dermatoses.

Methods: In a prospective multicenter study, 210 patients with work-related hand dermatoses were invited to wear either COT or SYM as GLs for 4 weeks underneath occlusive protective gloves during their regular work tasks. Acceptance of GL and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were assessed by questionnaires and the disease severity by the Osnabrueck Hand Eczema Severity Index.

Results: A total of 178 data sets were available (SYM: n = 89/103, 86.4%; COT: n = 89/107, 83.2%). Both GLs did not impair work performance and were applicable in various work activities. SYM received better ratings regarding climate conditions, mobility and tactility. COT showed superiority in fit, donning and doffing. No substantial intergroup differences regarding disease severity and HRQoL were observed.

Conclusions: SYM and COT were well tolerated and accepted, suggesting that SYM is a reasonable alternative for COT as GL in patients with hand dermatoses. The choice of material of GLs may depend on occupation-specific requirements for the performed tasks, individual needs and preferences.

半透性和纺织材料手套衬垫在手部皮肤病患者中的评价:一项多中心干预研究的结果(保护II)。
背景:手套衬垫(GLs)在不透水的手套下佩戴,以防止遮挡效果。目的:评价棉质手套(COT)和半透性手套(SYM)作为手部皮肤病GLs的接受度和耐受性。方法:在一项前瞻性多中心研究中,210名与工作相关的手部皮肤病患者被邀请在常规工作任务中戴上COT或SYM作为GLs,并戴上闭塞防护手套,为期4周。GL接受度和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)采用问卷评估,疾病严重程度采用Osnabrueck手部湿疹严重程度指数评估。结果:共获得178组数据集(SYM: n = 89/103, 86.4%;COT: n = 89/107, 83.2%)。两种gl都不影响工作表现,适用于各种工作活动。SYM在气候条件、机动性和触感方面获得了更好的评价。COT在贴身、搭绒、落绒方面表现出优越性。在疾病严重程度和HRQoL方面,组间无明显差异。结论:SYM和COT具有良好的耐受性和接受性,提示SYM是手部皮肤病患者替代COT作为GL的合理选择。GLs材料的选择可能取决于所执行任务的职业特定要求、个人需求和偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contact Dermatitis
Contact Dermatitis 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
30.90%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Contact Dermatitis is designed primarily as a journal for clinicians who are interested in various aspects of environmental dermatitis. This includes both allergic and irritant (toxic) types of contact dermatitis, occupational (industrial) dermatitis and consumers" dermatitis from such products as cosmetics and toiletries. The journal aims at promoting and maintaining communication among dermatologists, industrial physicians, allergists and clinical immunologists, as well as chemists and research workers involved in industry and the production of consumer goods. Papers are invited on clinical observations, diagnosis and methods of investigation of patients, therapeutic measures, organisation and legislation relating to the control of occupational and consumers".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信