Barriers to preceptorship in Interprofessional Education: an integrative review.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ciencia & saude coletiva Pub Date : 2025-06-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1413-812320242911.11472023
Camila Mendes da Silva Souza, Amanda Cristine Moraes de Oliveira, Valéria Marli Leonello
{"title":"Barriers to preceptorship in Interprofessional Education: an integrative review.","authors":"Camila Mendes da Silva Souza, Amanda Cristine Moraes de Oliveira, Valéria Marli Leonello","doi":"10.1590/1413-812320242911.11472023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Preceptorship in interprofessional education (IPE) occurs when the preceptor facilitates the learning of students from different programs about care from an interprofessional and collaborative perspective. The aim was to identify the barriers related to preceptorship in IPE. This integrative review searched for empirical articles in a comprehensive systematic search in eight databases. The data was extracted using a validated instrument and the analysis identified barriers at the micro, meso, and macro levels of the educational and professional systems. In the 17 studies, 10 barriers were identified at the micro level, such as lack of training, resistance to interprofessional work, and personal and professional availability for IPE and PIC; 13 barriers at the meso level, which include reconciling the demands of the service with preceptorship, few opportunities for interprofessional work and work overload; and five barriers at the macro level, involving lack of remuneration, the disease-centered care model and the predominance of uniprofessional education. The barriers reflect the complexity of interprofessional preceptorship, which is fundamental for training students for interprofessional education and integrating IPE into the workplace.</p>","PeriodicalId":10195,"journal":{"name":"Ciencia & saude coletiva","volume":"30 suppl 1","pages":"e11472023"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciencia & saude coletiva","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320242911.11472023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preceptorship in interprofessional education (IPE) occurs when the preceptor facilitates the learning of students from different programs about care from an interprofessional and collaborative perspective. The aim was to identify the barriers related to preceptorship in IPE. This integrative review searched for empirical articles in a comprehensive systematic search in eight databases. The data was extracted using a validated instrument and the analysis identified barriers at the micro, meso, and macro levels of the educational and professional systems. In the 17 studies, 10 barriers were identified at the micro level, such as lack of training, resistance to interprofessional work, and personal and professional availability for IPE and PIC; 13 barriers at the meso level, which include reconciling the demands of the service with preceptorship, few opportunities for interprofessional work and work overload; and five barriers at the macro level, involving lack of remuneration, the disease-centered care model and the predominance of uniprofessional education. The barriers reflect the complexity of interprofessional preceptorship, which is fundamental for training students for interprofessional education and integrating IPE into the workplace.

跨专业教育中师徒关系的障碍:综合回顾。
当导师从跨专业和合作的角度促进来自不同专业的学生学习有关护理的知识时,就会出现跨专业教育中的导师关系。目的是确定与国际政治经济学指导有关的障碍。这篇综合综述在8个数据库中进行了全面的系统搜索,搜索了实证文章。数据是使用一种经过验证的仪器提取的,分析确定了教育和专业系统在微观、中观和宏观层面的障碍。在17项研究中,在微观层面上确定了10个障碍,如缺乏培训、对跨专业工作的抵制、个人和专业的IPE和PIC可用性;中观层面的13个障碍,包括协调服务需求与指导、跨专业工作机会少和工作超载;宏观层面的五大障碍包括薪酬不足、以疾病为中心的护理模式和非专业教育的主导地位。这些障碍反映了跨专业指导的复杂性,这是培养学生跨专业教育和将IPE融入工作场所的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ciencia & saude coletiva
Ciencia & saude coletiva PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
533
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ciência & Saúde Coletiva publishes debates, analyses, and results of research on a Specific Theme considered current and relevant to the field of Collective Health. Its abbreviated title is Ciênc. saúde coletiva, which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信