[More efficient use of resources in research laboratories through quality management].

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sophia Sohns, Janine Kleymann-Hilmes
{"title":"[More efficient use of resources in research laboratories through quality management].","authors":"Sophia Sohns, Janine Kleymann-Hilmes","doi":"10.1007/s00103-025-04074-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>At first glance, research and quality management (QM) could hardly be more different. Research is characterized by freedom, creativity, and flexibility. QM often appears rigid, strict, and bureaucratic. Nevertheless, research laboratories can benefit significantly from the principles of QM, especially when it comes to increasing the quality and efficiency of research and thus making the best possible use of resources that are constantly limited.High research quality depends on various factors. These different influencing factors were examined in detail and implemented in a specific research quality management system (QMS) in pilot laboratories of the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) and at a university institution. The research QMS is based on the requirements of good scientific practice. It was shown that many laboratories have already established processes that can be further optimized and made more efficient by a QMS.A self-assessment tool for laboratory managers was developed to assess the maturity level of laboratory processes. This report provides an overview of the quality in research and shows ways in which this can be improved at the level of the working groups, tailored to their individual framework conditions. For this purpose, a QMS is proposed and a tool for the self-assessment of one's own processes is presented. The report is based on a comprehensive literature review and a cross-departmental and cross-institutional project of the RKI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-025-04074-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At first glance, research and quality management (QM) could hardly be more different. Research is characterized by freedom, creativity, and flexibility. QM often appears rigid, strict, and bureaucratic. Nevertheless, research laboratories can benefit significantly from the principles of QM, especially when it comes to increasing the quality and efficiency of research and thus making the best possible use of resources that are constantly limited.High research quality depends on various factors. These different influencing factors were examined in detail and implemented in a specific research quality management system (QMS) in pilot laboratories of the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) and at a university institution. The research QMS is based on the requirements of good scientific practice. It was shown that many laboratories have already established processes that can be further optimized and made more efficient by a QMS.A self-assessment tool for laboratory managers was developed to assess the maturity level of laboratory processes. This report provides an overview of the quality in research and shows ways in which this can be improved at the level of the working groups, tailored to their individual framework conditions. For this purpose, a QMS is proposed and a tool for the self-assessment of one's own processes is presented. The report is based on a comprehensive literature review and a cross-departmental and cross-institutional project of the RKI.

[通过质量管理更有效地利用研究实验室的资源]。
乍一看,研究和质量管理(QM)截然不同。研究的特点是自由、创造性和灵活性。质量管理常常显得僵化、严格和官僚。然而,研究实验室可以从质量管理的原则中获益良多,特别是在提高研究的质量和效率,从而尽可能地利用有限的资源方面。高研究质量取决于多种因素。对这些不同的影响因素进行了详细的研究,并在罗伯特科赫研究所(RKI)的试点实验室和一所大学机构的具体研究质量管理体系(QMS)中实施。研究质量管理体系建立在良好科学规范的要求之上。结果表明,许多实验室已经建立了可以通过质量管理体系进一步优化和提高效率的流程。开发了实验室管理人员的自我评估工具,以评估实验室过程的成熟度水平。本报告概述了研究质量,并展示了在工作组层面上根据其各自的框架条件改进研究质量的方法。为此,提出了质量管理体系,并提出了对自己的过程进行自我评估的工具。该报告是基于全面的文献综述和RKI跨部门和跨机构的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Monatszeitschrift Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz - umfasst alle Fragestellungen und Bereiche, mit denen sich das öffentliche Gesundheitswesen und die staatliche Gesundheitspolitik auseinandersetzen. Ziel ist es, zum einen über wesentliche Entwicklungen in der biologisch-medizinischen Grundlagenforschung auf dem Laufenden zu halten und zum anderen über konkrete Maßnahmen zum Gesundheitsschutz, über Konzepte der Prävention, Risikoabwehr und Gesundheitsförderung zu informieren. Wichtige Themengebiete sind die Epidemiologie übertragbarer und nicht übertragbarer Krankheiten, der umweltbezogene Gesundheitsschutz sowie gesundheitsökonomische, medizinethische und -rechtliche Fragestellungen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信