{"title":"Is Ultrasound-Guided Steroid Injection Less Effective in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Patients with Bifid Median Nerve?: A Focus on Short-Term Efficacy.","authors":"Büşra Şirin Ahisha, Nurdan Paker","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of bifid median nerve (BMN) on treatment response to ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This observational study included 50 patients with mild to moderate CTS undergoing ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection. During the procedure, 25 patients with a BMN and 25 with a normal median nerve (NMN) were consecutively selected. 21 from each group completed the 4-week follow-up. Symptom severity, functional status, and disability were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ), and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (Quick-DASH). Treatment response was defined as a ≥ 50% reduction in VAS at 4 weeks post-injection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-treatment VAS, BCTQ-SSS, BCTQ-FSS, and Quick-DASH scores did not differ between groups (p > 0.05). At 4 weeks, 76.19% of NMN patients achieved a ≥ 50% VAS reduction versus 33.33% in the BMN group (p = 0.005). While both groups improved post-injection (p < 0.05), the BMN group showed significantly lower improvement in VAS (p = 0.004), BCTQ-SSS (p = 0.015), BCTQ-FSS (p = 0.008), and Quick-DASH (p = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection was effective in both groups, but response was significantly lower in BMN patients. BMN may be a risk factor for treatment failure, highlighting the need for alternative injection strategies or combination therapies to optimize outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002771","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the impact of bifid median nerve (BMN) on treatment response to ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
Design: This observational study included 50 patients with mild to moderate CTS undergoing ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection. During the procedure, 25 patients with a BMN and 25 with a normal median nerve (NMN) were consecutively selected. 21 from each group completed the 4-week follow-up. Symptom severity, functional status, and disability were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ), and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (Quick-DASH). Treatment response was defined as a ≥ 50% reduction in VAS at 4 weeks post-injection.
Results: Pre-treatment VAS, BCTQ-SSS, BCTQ-FSS, and Quick-DASH scores did not differ between groups (p > 0.05). At 4 weeks, 76.19% of NMN patients achieved a ≥ 50% VAS reduction versus 33.33% in the BMN group (p = 0.005). While both groups improved post-injection (p < 0.05), the BMN group showed significantly lower improvement in VAS (p = 0.004), BCTQ-SSS (p = 0.015), BCTQ-FSS (p = 0.008), and Quick-DASH (p = 0.013).
Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection was effective in both groups, but response was significantly lower in BMN patients. BMN may be a risk factor for treatment failure, highlighting the need for alternative injection strategies or combination therapies to optimize outcomes.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals.
Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).