Is Ultrasound-Guided Steroid Injection Less Effective in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Patients with Bifid Median Nerve?: A Focus on Short-Term Efficacy.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Büşra Şirin Ahisha, Nurdan Paker
{"title":"Is Ultrasound-Guided Steroid Injection Less Effective in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Patients with Bifid Median Nerve?: A Focus on Short-Term Efficacy.","authors":"Büşra Şirin Ahisha, Nurdan Paker","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of bifid median nerve (BMN) on treatment response to ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This observational study included 50 patients with mild to moderate CTS undergoing ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection. During the procedure, 25 patients with a BMN and 25 with a normal median nerve (NMN) were consecutively selected. 21 from each group completed the 4-week follow-up. Symptom severity, functional status, and disability were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ), and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (Quick-DASH). Treatment response was defined as a ≥ 50% reduction in VAS at 4 weeks post-injection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-treatment VAS, BCTQ-SSS, BCTQ-FSS, and Quick-DASH scores did not differ between groups (p > 0.05). At 4 weeks, 76.19% of NMN patients achieved a ≥ 50% VAS reduction versus 33.33% in the BMN group (p = 0.005). While both groups improved post-injection (p < 0.05), the BMN group showed significantly lower improvement in VAS (p = 0.004), BCTQ-SSS (p = 0.015), BCTQ-FSS (p = 0.008), and Quick-DASH (p = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection was effective in both groups, but response was significantly lower in BMN patients. BMN may be a risk factor for treatment failure, highlighting the need for alternative injection strategies or combination therapies to optimize outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002771","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of bifid median nerve (BMN) on treatment response to ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Design: This observational study included 50 patients with mild to moderate CTS undergoing ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection. During the procedure, 25 patients with a BMN and 25 with a normal median nerve (NMN) were consecutively selected. 21 from each group completed the 4-week follow-up. Symptom severity, functional status, and disability were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ), and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (Quick-DASH). Treatment response was defined as a ≥ 50% reduction in VAS at 4 weeks post-injection.

Results: Pre-treatment VAS, BCTQ-SSS, BCTQ-FSS, and Quick-DASH scores did not differ between groups (p > 0.05). At 4 weeks, 76.19% of NMN patients achieved a ≥ 50% VAS reduction versus 33.33% in the BMN group (p = 0.005). While both groups improved post-injection (p < 0.05), the BMN group showed significantly lower improvement in VAS (p = 0.004), BCTQ-SSS (p = 0.015), BCTQ-FSS (p = 0.008), and Quick-DASH (p = 0.013).

Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection was effective in both groups, but response was significantly lower in BMN patients. BMN may be a risk factor for treatment failure, highlighting the need for alternative injection strategies or combination therapies to optimize outcomes.

超声引导下类固醇注射治疗双正中神经裂的腕管综合征患者效果较差吗?:关注短期效果。
目的:探讨双裂正中神经(BMN)对超声引导下腕管综合征(CTS)患者皮质类固醇注射疗效的影响。设计:本观察性研究包括50例轻中度CTS患者,接受超声引导皮质类固醇注射。在手术过程中,连续选择25例BMN患者和25例正常正中神经(NMN)患者。两组各有21例完成了为期4周的随访。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、波士顿腕管综合征问卷(BCTQ)和臂、肩、手快速残疾问卷(Quick- dash)评估症状严重程度、功能状态和残疾程度。治疗反应定义为注射后4周VAS降低≥50%。结果:治疗前VAS、BCTQ-SSS、BCTQ-FSS、Quick-DASH评分组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。在第4周,76.19%的NMN患者达到≥50%的VAS降低,而BMN组为33.33% (p = 0.005)。两组注射后均有改善(p < 0.05),但BMN组VAS (p = 0.004)、BCTQ-SSS (p = 0.015)、BCTQ-FSS (p = 0.008)、fast - dash (p = 0.013)的改善明显低于对照组。结论:超声引导下皮质类固醇注射在两组均有效,但BMN患者的反应明显较低。BMN可能是治疗失败的一个危险因素,强调需要替代注射策略或联合治疗来优化结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信