Vestibular rehabilitation: Proven benefits in enhancing balance and reducing dizziness.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Xiaohua Sun, Zuwei Cao, Xin Li
{"title":"Vestibular rehabilitation: Proven benefits in enhancing balance and reducing dizziness.","authors":"Xiaohua Sun, Zuwei Cao, Xin Li","doi":"10.17219/acem/193242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) is widely utilized to enhance balance and mitigate dizziness in patients with vestibular disorders. However, its overall effectiveness remains to be comprehensively assessed, particularly in the context of variability among studies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to address the current need for a systematic evaluation of VRT's efficacy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A meta-analysis was conducted using the \"meta\" and \"dmetar\" R packages to evaluate VRT's efficacy. The analysis included statistical tools, such as Begg's test, Egger's test, Baujat plots, Galbraith plots, and influence analysis. Additionally, heterogeneity and outliers were assessed using generalized scatterplot smoothing (GOSH) diagnostics and clustering methods, including K-means, density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) and Gaussian mixture model (GMM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis examined the impact of VRT on the dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) and Berg balance scale (BBS). For the DHI, VRT resulted in a significant mean improvement of 7.63 points, despite high heterogeneity (I2 = 88%). Similarly, the BBS exhibited significant improvement, with a mean difference (MD) of -2.31 points in the fixed effects model, while the random effects model also suggested improvement, though with greater variability (I2 = 92%). Subgroup analysis identified outliers significantly influencing the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We showed that VRT significantly enhanced patient outcomes as measured with both the DHI and BBS. These findings provide strong evidence supporting VRT's effectiveness, though the substantial heterogeneity underscores the need for further research to refine patient selection and intervention protocols. This study advances the understanding of VRT's role in managing vestibular disorders and highlights the importance of addressing variability in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/193242","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) is widely utilized to enhance balance and mitigate dizziness in patients with vestibular disorders. However, its overall effectiveness remains to be comprehensively assessed, particularly in the context of variability among studies.

Objectives: This study aimed to address the current need for a systematic evaluation of VRT's efficacy.

Material and methods: A meta-analysis was conducted using the "meta" and "dmetar" R packages to evaluate VRT's efficacy. The analysis included statistical tools, such as Begg's test, Egger's test, Baujat plots, Galbraith plots, and influence analysis. Additionally, heterogeneity and outliers were assessed using generalized scatterplot smoothing (GOSH) diagnostics and clustering methods, including K-means, density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) and Gaussian mixture model (GMM).

Results: The meta-analysis examined the impact of VRT on the dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) and Berg balance scale (BBS). For the DHI, VRT resulted in a significant mean improvement of 7.63 points, despite high heterogeneity (I2 = 88%). Similarly, the BBS exhibited significant improvement, with a mean difference (MD) of -2.31 points in the fixed effects model, while the random effects model also suggested improvement, though with greater variability (I2 = 92%). Subgroup analysis identified outliers significantly influencing the results.

Conclusion: We showed that VRT significantly enhanced patient outcomes as measured with both the DHI and BBS. These findings provide strong evidence supporting VRT's effectiveness, though the substantial heterogeneity underscores the need for further research to refine patient selection and intervention protocols. This study advances the understanding of VRT's role in managing vestibular disorders and highlights the importance of addressing variability in future studies.

前庭康复:证实在增强平衡和减少头晕方面有好处。
背景:前庭康复治疗(VRT)被广泛应用于前庭疾病患者的平衡和减轻头晕。然而,其总体有效性仍有待全面评估,特别是在研究之间存在差异的背景下。目的:本研究旨在解决当前对VRT疗效进行系统评估的需求。材料与方法:采用meta和dmetar R包进行meta分析,评价VRT的疗效。分析包括统计工具,如Begg检验、Egger检验、Baujat图、Galbraith图和影响分析。此外,使用广义散点图平滑(GOSH)诊断和聚类方法评估异质性和异常值,包括K-means,基于密度的空间聚类应用噪声(DBSCAN)和高斯混合模型(GMM)。结果:荟萃分析检验了VRT对头晕障碍量表(DHI)和Berg平衡量表(BBS)的影响。对于DHI,尽管异质性很高(I2 = 88%), VRT的平均显著改善为7.63分。同样,BBS表现出显著的改善,固定效应模型的平均差异(MD)为-2.31分,而随机效应模型也显示出改善,尽管差异较大(I2 = 92%)。亚组分析确定了显著影响结果的异常值。结论:通过DHI和BBS测量,我们发现VRT显著提高了患者的预后。这些发现为支持VRT的有效性提供了强有力的证据,尽管巨大的异质性强调了进一步研究以完善患者选择和干预方案的必要性。这项研究促进了对VRT在管理前庭疾病中的作用的理解,并强调了在未来研究中解决变异性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly. Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff. Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj. Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker. The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition. In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus. Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信