{"title":"Vestibular rehabilitation: Proven benefits in enhancing balance and reducing dizziness.","authors":"Xiaohua Sun, Zuwei Cao, Xin Li","doi":"10.17219/acem/193242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) is widely utilized to enhance balance and mitigate dizziness in patients with vestibular disorders. However, its overall effectiveness remains to be comprehensively assessed, particularly in the context of variability among studies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to address the current need for a systematic evaluation of VRT's efficacy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A meta-analysis was conducted using the \"meta\" and \"dmetar\" R packages to evaluate VRT's efficacy. The analysis included statistical tools, such as Begg's test, Egger's test, Baujat plots, Galbraith plots, and influence analysis. Additionally, heterogeneity and outliers were assessed using generalized scatterplot smoothing (GOSH) diagnostics and clustering methods, including K-means, density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) and Gaussian mixture model (GMM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis examined the impact of VRT on the dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) and Berg balance scale (BBS). For the DHI, VRT resulted in a significant mean improvement of 7.63 points, despite high heterogeneity (I2 = 88%). Similarly, the BBS exhibited significant improvement, with a mean difference (MD) of -2.31 points in the fixed effects model, while the random effects model also suggested improvement, though with greater variability (I2 = 92%). Subgroup analysis identified outliers significantly influencing the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We showed that VRT significantly enhanced patient outcomes as measured with both the DHI and BBS. These findings provide strong evidence supporting VRT's effectiveness, though the substantial heterogeneity underscores the need for further research to refine patient selection and intervention protocols. This study advances the understanding of VRT's role in managing vestibular disorders and highlights the importance of addressing variability in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/193242","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) is widely utilized to enhance balance and mitigate dizziness in patients with vestibular disorders. However, its overall effectiveness remains to be comprehensively assessed, particularly in the context of variability among studies.
Objectives: This study aimed to address the current need for a systematic evaluation of VRT's efficacy.
Material and methods: A meta-analysis was conducted using the "meta" and "dmetar" R packages to evaluate VRT's efficacy. The analysis included statistical tools, such as Begg's test, Egger's test, Baujat plots, Galbraith plots, and influence analysis. Additionally, heterogeneity and outliers were assessed using generalized scatterplot smoothing (GOSH) diagnostics and clustering methods, including K-means, density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) and Gaussian mixture model (GMM).
Results: The meta-analysis examined the impact of VRT on the dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) and Berg balance scale (BBS). For the DHI, VRT resulted in a significant mean improvement of 7.63 points, despite high heterogeneity (I2 = 88%). Similarly, the BBS exhibited significant improvement, with a mean difference (MD) of -2.31 points in the fixed effects model, while the random effects model also suggested improvement, though with greater variability (I2 = 92%). Subgroup analysis identified outliers significantly influencing the results.
Conclusion: We showed that VRT significantly enhanced patient outcomes as measured with both the DHI and BBS. These findings provide strong evidence supporting VRT's effectiveness, though the substantial heterogeneity underscores the need for further research to refine patient selection and intervention protocols. This study advances the understanding of VRT's role in managing vestibular disorders and highlights the importance of addressing variability in future studies.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly.
Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff.
Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj.
Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker.
The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition.
In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus.
Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.