Pathways towards equity: Solutions-focused workshops with urban greening professionals

IF 9.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Kaitlyn Pike , Lorien Nesbitt , Daniel Sax , Jess Quinton , Cecil Konijnendijk , Susan D. Day , Tenley Conway , Amber Grant
{"title":"Pathways towards equity: Solutions-focused workshops with urban greening professionals","authors":"Kaitlyn Pike ,&nbsp;Lorien Nesbitt ,&nbsp;Daniel Sax ,&nbsp;Jess Quinton ,&nbsp;Cecil Konijnendijk ,&nbsp;Susan D. Day ,&nbsp;Tenley Conway ,&nbsp;Amber Grant","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban green governance refers to the complex network of actors working across sectors to manage urban vegetation. While recent research has identified barriers to addressing green space inequities, there has been much less focus on how these barriers interact as self-reinforcing systems or on potential solutions. This study explores how urban greening professionals understand and operationalize pathways toward more equitable governance, applying a multidimensional justice framework that considers distributional, procedural, and recognitional aspects of equity. We conducted participatory workshops with 28 urban greening professionals in two Canadian metro regions, using a Future Wheel methodology that had participants collaboratively analyze barriers to equity and strategies for addressing them across seven locally relevant greening initiatives.</div><div>Participants’ equity-related concerns included documented experiences of recognitional injustice, ambiguity regarding implementation processes, and competing priorities between actors. These concerns were reinforced by interconnected barriers: limited resources, insufficient coordination, and systemic constraints from existing governance structures. To overcome these challenges, participants recommended policy changes that prioritize multi-level collaboration and community engagement throughout planning processes. Participants believed addressing these interconnected barriers would have mostly positive implications—including improved governance capacity, more meaningful community engagement, and more equitable access to green spaces—though some acknowledged potential negative outcomes such as displacement or political backlash. Our findings highlight how barriers to equity persist through mutually reinforcing feedback loops, demonstrating the importance of reflexive, collaborative governance approaches that can address multiple dimensions of equity simultaneously while remaining adaptable to local contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"263 ","pages":"Article 105437"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204625001446","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban green governance refers to the complex network of actors working across sectors to manage urban vegetation. While recent research has identified barriers to addressing green space inequities, there has been much less focus on how these barriers interact as self-reinforcing systems or on potential solutions. This study explores how urban greening professionals understand and operationalize pathways toward more equitable governance, applying a multidimensional justice framework that considers distributional, procedural, and recognitional aspects of equity. We conducted participatory workshops with 28 urban greening professionals in two Canadian metro regions, using a Future Wheel methodology that had participants collaboratively analyze barriers to equity and strategies for addressing them across seven locally relevant greening initiatives.
Participants’ equity-related concerns included documented experiences of recognitional injustice, ambiguity regarding implementation processes, and competing priorities between actors. These concerns were reinforced by interconnected barriers: limited resources, insufficient coordination, and systemic constraints from existing governance structures. To overcome these challenges, participants recommended policy changes that prioritize multi-level collaboration and community engagement throughout planning processes. Participants believed addressing these interconnected barriers would have mostly positive implications—including improved governance capacity, more meaningful community engagement, and more equitable access to green spaces—though some acknowledged potential negative outcomes such as displacement or political backlash. Our findings highlight how barriers to equity persist through mutually reinforcing feedback loops, demonstrating the importance of reflexive, collaborative governance approaches that can address multiple dimensions of equity simultaneously while remaining adaptable to local contexts.
通往公平的道路:与城市绿化专业人士一起举办的以解决方案为重点的研讨会
城市绿色治理是指跨部门管理城市植被的复杂网络。虽然最近的研究已经确定了解决绿色空间不平等的障碍,但对这些障碍如何作为自我强化系统相互作用或潜在解决方案的关注要少得多。本研究探讨了城市绿化专业人员如何理解和实施实现更公平治理的途径,运用了一个多维的正义框架,考虑了公平的分配、程序和承认方面。我们在加拿大的两个都会区与28名城市绿化专业人士进行了参与式研讨会,使用未来之轮方法,让参与者合作分析公平的障碍,并在七项当地相关的绿化倡议中解决这些障碍的策略。参与者的与公平相关的关切包括记录在案的承认不公正的经历、执行过程的模糊性以及行动者之间的优先事项竞争。这些问题被相互关联的障碍所强化:有限的资源、不充分的协调和来自现有治理结构的系统性约束。为了克服这些挑战,与会者建议改变政策,在规划过程中优先考虑多层次合作和社区参与。与会者认为,解决这些相互关联的障碍将产生积极的影响,包括改善治理能力,更有意义的社区参与,以及更公平地获得绿色空间,尽管一些人承认潜在的负面影响,如流离失所或政治反弹。我们的研究结果强调了公平障碍是如何通过相互加强的反馈循环而持续存在的,这表明了反身性、合作性治理方法的重要性,这种方法可以同时解决公平的多个维度,同时保持对当地环境的适应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Landscape and Urban Planning
Landscape and Urban Planning 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信