Bas van Oudenhoven , Evangelia Demerouti , Rob Basten , Philippe Van de Calseyde
{"title":"Preparing for predictive maintenance: Employee perspectives on job demands and resources before and after its implementation","authors":"Bas van Oudenhoven , Evangelia Demerouti , Rob Basten , Philippe Van de Calseyde","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Predictive maintenance (PdM) technologies promise to be valuable resources for maintenance employees. However, employees often view these technologies with skepticism. We conducted 35 interviews with maintenance employees at three different organizations to gauge their perspectives on PdM implementation. Using Job Demands-Resources theory and Carayon's Work System model as frameworks, we explored per work domain which demands (hindering work characteristics) and resources (facilitating work characteristics) employees experience under their current, non-PdM working procedures and what they expect to experience under PdM. The results show that employees currently view their decision-support system and organization as demands; however, they expect both to become resources under PdM. Nevertheless, employees express concerns that PdM may undermine their job autonomy and expertise, and they warn of the potential negative effects of false alarms generated by PdM technologies. Organizations can use these insights to (re)design PdM systems, thereby improving the acceptance and effectiveness of PdM technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 104561"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687025000973","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Predictive maintenance (PdM) technologies promise to be valuable resources for maintenance employees. However, employees often view these technologies with skepticism. We conducted 35 interviews with maintenance employees at three different organizations to gauge their perspectives on PdM implementation. Using Job Demands-Resources theory and Carayon's Work System model as frameworks, we explored per work domain which demands (hindering work characteristics) and resources (facilitating work characteristics) employees experience under their current, non-PdM working procedures and what they expect to experience under PdM. The results show that employees currently view their decision-support system and organization as demands; however, they expect both to become resources under PdM. Nevertheless, employees express concerns that PdM may undermine their job autonomy and expertise, and they warn of the potential negative effects of false alarms generated by PdM technologies. Organizations can use these insights to (re)design PdM systems, thereby improving the acceptance and effectiveness of PdM technologies.
期刊介绍:
Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.