Stability of non-premixed turbulent methane flames: Numerical simulations of the critical diameter and flame stability limits

IF 7.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Mina Kazemi, Sile Brennan, Vladimir Molkov
{"title":"Stability of non-premixed turbulent methane flames: Numerical simulations of the critical diameter and flame stability limits","authors":"Mina Kazemi,&nbsp;Sile Brennan,&nbsp;Vladimir Molkov","doi":"10.1016/j.fuproc.2025.108249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model is developed and validated against experimental data to predict the critical diameter and stability limits of non-premixed turbulent methane flames. The critical diameter defines the orifice size beyond which a stable flame persists at all driving pressures and below this pressure stability is pressure-dependent. Flame stability follows a “peninsula” curve of pressure versus release diameter, with sustained flames above the upper and below the lower pressure limits, while the intermediate region represents a blow-out zone where combustion is not sustained. The critical diameter, at the curve's rightmost point, is crucial for predicting sustained flames. Methane releases have been simulated for conditions in the region of the critical diameter, and for diameters and pressures ranging from 15 to 45 mm and 0.01 to 20 MPa, respectively, corresponding to the upper and lower flame stability limits using the realizable k − ε model and EDC combustion model. The simulations accurately captured blow-out and sustained flames, yielding a critical diameter of 42 mm, consistent with experiments. A methane flame at 5.88 MPa gauge through a 50 mm orifice was also simulated, showing flame length and lift-off distance in agreement with experimental observations. These results confirm the model's reliability in predicting methane flame stability, providing valuable insights for safety and combustion applications. This study presents the first CFD-based reproduction of the full methane flame stability curve, validating model reliability across a wide pressure range and providing a predictive tool for future applications, including the assessment of flame stability in methane‑hydrogen mixtures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":326,"journal":{"name":"Fuel Processing Technology","volume":"275 ","pages":"Article 108249"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuel Processing Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378382025000736","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model is developed and validated against experimental data to predict the critical diameter and stability limits of non-premixed turbulent methane flames. The critical diameter defines the orifice size beyond which a stable flame persists at all driving pressures and below this pressure stability is pressure-dependent. Flame stability follows a “peninsula” curve of pressure versus release diameter, with sustained flames above the upper and below the lower pressure limits, while the intermediate region represents a blow-out zone where combustion is not sustained. The critical diameter, at the curve's rightmost point, is crucial for predicting sustained flames. Methane releases have been simulated for conditions in the region of the critical diameter, and for diameters and pressures ranging from 15 to 45 mm and 0.01 to 20 MPa, respectively, corresponding to the upper and lower flame stability limits using the realizable k − ε model and EDC combustion model. The simulations accurately captured blow-out and sustained flames, yielding a critical diameter of 42 mm, consistent with experiments. A methane flame at 5.88 MPa gauge through a 50 mm orifice was also simulated, showing flame length and lift-off distance in agreement with experimental observations. These results confirm the model's reliability in predicting methane flame stability, providing valuable insights for safety and combustion applications. This study presents the first CFD-based reproduction of the full methane flame stability curve, validating model reliability across a wide pressure range and providing a predictive tool for future applications, including the assessment of flame stability in methane‑hydrogen mixtures.
非预混甲烷湍流火焰的稳定性:临界直径和火焰稳定性极限的数值模拟
建立了计算流体动力学(CFD)模型,并根据实验数据进行了验证,以预测非预混甲烷湍流火焰的临界直径和稳定性极限。临界直径定义了在所有驱动压力下稳定火焰持续的孔尺寸,低于此压力的稳定性依赖于压力。火焰稳定性遵循压力与释放直径的“半岛”曲线,持续的火焰高于压力上限,低于压力下限,而中间区域代表燃烧不持续的吹灭区。曲线最右边点的临界直径对于预测持续的火焰至关重要。利用可实现的k−ε模型和EDC燃烧模型,分别模拟了临界直径区域、直径和压力范围分别为15 ~ 45 mm和0.01 ~ 20 MPa,对应火焰稳定性上限和下限的甲烷释放情况。模拟准确地捕获了爆炸和持续的火焰,产生了42毫米的临界直径,与实验一致。在5.88 MPa压力下,通过50 mm孔对甲烷火焰进行了模拟,得到了火焰长度和起飞距离与实验结果一致。这些结果证实了该模型在预测甲烷火焰稳定性方面的可靠性,为安全和燃烧应用提供了有价值的见解。该研究首次基于cfd再现了全甲烷火焰稳定性曲线,验证了模型在宽压力范围内的可靠性,并为未来的应用提供了预测工具,包括评估甲烷-氢混合物的火焰稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fuel Processing Technology
Fuel Processing Technology 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
398
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Fuel Processing Technology (FPT) deals with the scientific and technological aspects of converting fossil and renewable resources to clean fuels, value-added chemicals, fuel-related advanced carbon materials and by-products. In addition to the traditional non-nuclear fossil fuels, biomass and wastes, papers on the integration of renewables such as solar and wind energy and energy storage into the fuel processing processes, as well as papers on the production and conversion of non-carbon-containing fuels such as hydrogen and ammonia, are also welcome. While chemical conversion is emphasized, papers on advanced physical conversion processes are also considered for publication in FPT. Papers on the fundamental aspects of fuel structure and properties will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信