The Impact of Social Deprivation on Phalangeal Fracture Operative Treatment Outcomes

Q3 Medicine
Jacob D. Kodra BS , Austen Schweinert BS , Mackenzie O’Connell MS , Matthew Van Boxtel MD , Alexander R. Graf MD , Jessica Hanley MD
{"title":"The Impact of Social Deprivation on Phalangeal Fracture Operative Treatment Outcomes","authors":"Jacob D. Kodra BS ,&nbsp;Austen Schweinert BS ,&nbsp;Mackenzie O’Connell MS ,&nbsp;Matthew Van Boxtel MD ,&nbsp;Alexander R. Graf MD ,&nbsp;Jessica Hanley MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between social determinants of health and outcomes following phalangeal fracture surgery using the Area Deprivation Index.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective chart review was performed on patients ≥18 years old who underwent surgical fixation of a proximal, middle, or distal phalangeal fracture at our level I trauma center from January 2006 to December 2018. Surgical techniques included open reduction and internal fixation, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, intramedullary fixation, and external fixation. Patients with multiple fractures or who required nonsurgical treatment were excluded. Demographics, comorbidities, range of motion, visual analog scale pain scores, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (<em>Quick</em>DASH) scores were analyzed. The Area Deprivation Index categorized patients into terciles by their relative deprivation level. Statistical tests included analysis of variance, chi-square tests, and multivariate logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 194 patients were included. The most deprived group had a greater proportion of Black/African Americans. No significant differences were observed in fracture patterns, surgical technique, or implant utilization. Preoperative pain scores were greater in the most deprived group (6.05 ± 2.61) compared with the least deprived group (3.95 ± 2.80). Postoperative pain was also higher in the most deprived group (2.14 ± 2.46) versus the least deprived group (0.50 ± 0.73). Preoperative <em>Quick</em>DASH scores were greater in the most deprived group (61.36 ± 22.94) compared with the intermediately deprived group (46.04 ± 20.59).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Social deprivation may influence preoperative and postoperative pain in phalangeal fracture surgery. Considering socioeconomic factors could help address underlying disparities and enhance patient recovery.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Prognostic III.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 100765"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514125000854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between social determinants of health and outcomes following phalangeal fracture surgery using the Area Deprivation Index.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed on patients ≥18 years old who underwent surgical fixation of a proximal, middle, or distal phalangeal fracture at our level I trauma center from January 2006 to December 2018. Surgical techniques included open reduction and internal fixation, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, intramedullary fixation, and external fixation. Patients with multiple fractures or who required nonsurgical treatment were excluded. Demographics, comorbidities, range of motion, visual analog scale pain scores, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores were analyzed. The Area Deprivation Index categorized patients into terciles by their relative deprivation level. Statistical tests included analysis of variance, chi-square tests, and multivariate logistic regression.

Results

In total, 194 patients were included. The most deprived group had a greater proportion of Black/African Americans. No significant differences were observed in fracture patterns, surgical technique, or implant utilization. Preoperative pain scores were greater in the most deprived group (6.05 ± 2.61) compared with the least deprived group (3.95 ± 2.80). Postoperative pain was also higher in the most deprived group (2.14 ± 2.46) versus the least deprived group (0.50 ± 0.73). Preoperative QuickDASH scores were greater in the most deprived group (61.36 ± 22.94) compared with the intermediately deprived group (46.04 ± 20.59).

Conclusions

Social deprivation may influence preoperative and postoperative pain in phalangeal fracture surgery. Considering socioeconomic factors could help address underlying disparities and enhance patient recovery.

Type of study/level of evidence

Prognostic III.
社会剥夺对指骨骨折手术治疗效果的影响
目的本研究的目的是利用面积剥夺指数评估指骨骨折术后健康的社会决定因素与预后之间的关系。方法回顾性分析我院一级创伤中心2006年1月至2018年12月收治的指骨近端、中端或远端骨折手术固定患者,年龄≥18岁。手术技术包括切开复位内固定、闭合复位经皮钉钉、髓内固定和外固定。多处骨折或需要非手术治疗的患者被排除在外。分析了人口统计学、合并症、活动范围、视觉模拟量表疼痛评分和手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾(QuickDASH)评分。区域剥夺指数根据患者的相对剥夺程度将患者分为不同的类别。统计检验包括方差分析、卡方检验和多元逻辑回归。结果共纳入194例患者。在最贫困的群体中,黑人/非裔美国人的比例更高。在骨折类型、手术技术或植入物的使用方面没有观察到显著差异。术前疼痛评分最剥夺组(6.05±2.61)高于最剥夺组(3.95±2.80)。最贫困组术后疼痛(2.14±2.46)高于最贫困组(0.50±0.73)。术前最剥夺组QuickDASH评分(61.36±22.94)高于中度剥夺组(46.04±20.59)。结论社会剥夺可能影响指骨骨折手术术前和术后疼痛。考虑社会经济因素可以帮助解决潜在的差异,并促进患者康复。研究类型/证据水平预后
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信