When teachers become learners: Challenges with the integration of critical thinking into accounting curricula

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Alet Terblanche , Annelien Andriana van Rooyen , Prince Chukwuneme Enwereji
{"title":"When teachers become learners: Challenges with the integration of critical thinking into accounting curricula","authors":"Alet Terblanche ,&nbsp;Annelien Andriana van Rooyen ,&nbsp;Prince Chukwuneme Enwereji","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accounting educators' perceptions of their own critical thinking skills, their understanding of critical thinking and their ability to develop critical thinking in their students were investigated in the study. While critical thinking is widely acknowledged as a core goal of higher education, prior research has largely overlooked educators' self-perceptions, a vital factor in fostering students' critical thinking abilities. This study addresses this gap by examining educators' views on their competencies and pedagogical strategies for teaching critical thinking. A quantitative research design was adopted for the study. A questionnaire comprising seven statements scored on a four-point Likert scale and three open-ended questions was used. Descriptive statistics provided an overview of the self-assessed skills, while thematic analysis of open-ended responses revealed key insights. Themes included a significant demand for additional training and skills development in critical thinking pedagogies, with a focus on adult learning theories, andragogy and self-directed learning while the categories represented the responses from the participants. The thematic analysis assisted in contextualising the responses based on the identified learning needs, participants' perspectives, and the broader framework of adult education principles. This process allowed for a deeper understanding of how critical thinking pedagogies, andragogy, and self-directed learning can be effectively integrated into training programs to enhance skill development and educational outcomes. Participants emphasised the necessity of continuous professional development and specialised workshops to enhance their ability to teach critical thinking effectively. Based on the findings, it was recommended that higher education institutions and professional bodies invest in comprehensive training programmes and support mechanisms to integrate critical thinking into teaching practices with a view to nurturing a new generation of critical thinkers in the accounting profession.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101878"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187125001270","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accounting educators' perceptions of their own critical thinking skills, their understanding of critical thinking and their ability to develop critical thinking in their students were investigated in the study. While critical thinking is widely acknowledged as a core goal of higher education, prior research has largely overlooked educators' self-perceptions, a vital factor in fostering students' critical thinking abilities. This study addresses this gap by examining educators' views on their competencies and pedagogical strategies for teaching critical thinking. A quantitative research design was adopted for the study. A questionnaire comprising seven statements scored on a four-point Likert scale and three open-ended questions was used. Descriptive statistics provided an overview of the self-assessed skills, while thematic analysis of open-ended responses revealed key insights. Themes included a significant demand for additional training and skills development in critical thinking pedagogies, with a focus on adult learning theories, andragogy and self-directed learning while the categories represented the responses from the participants. The thematic analysis assisted in contextualising the responses based on the identified learning needs, participants' perspectives, and the broader framework of adult education principles. This process allowed for a deeper understanding of how critical thinking pedagogies, andragogy, and self-directed learning can be effectively integrated into training programs to enhance skill development and educational outcomes. Participants emphasised the necessity of continuous professional development and specialised workshops to enhance their ability to teach critical thinking effectively. Based on the findings, it was recommended that higher education institutions and professional bodies invest in comprehensive training programmes and support mechanisms to integrate critical thinking into teaching practices with a view to nurturing a new generation of critical thinkers in the accounting profession.
当教师成为学习者:将批判性思维融入会计课程的挑战
本研究调查了会计教育工作者对自己批判性思维能力的看法、对批判性思维的理解以及培养学生批判性思维的能力。虽然批判性思维被广泛认为是高等教育的核心目标,但之前的研究在很大程度上忽视了教育者的自我认知,而自我认知是培养学生批判性思维能力的重要因素。本研究通过考察教育工作者对批判性思维教学能力和教学策略的看法来解决这一差距。本研究采用定量研究设计。调查问卷采用李克特四分制,包括七个陈述和三个开放式问题。描述性统计提供了自我评估技能的概述,而对开放式答复的专题分析揭示了关键见解。主题包括对批判性思维教学法的额外培训和技能发展的重大需求,重点是成人学习理论、心理学和自主学习,而类别则代表了参与者的反应。专题分析有助于根据已确定的学习需要、参与者的观点和成人教育原则的更广泛框架将这些反应纳入背景。这一过程使我们能够更深入地了解如何将批判性思维教学法、方法论和自主学习有效地整合到培训计划中,以提高技能发展和教育成果。与会者强调,必须持续专业发展和举办专门工作坊,以提高他们有效教授批判性思维的能力。根据调查结果,建议高等教育机构和专业团体投资于综合培训计划和支持机制,将批判性思维融入教学实践,以培养新一代会计专业的批判性思考者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信