Reliability of the Five Step Assessment and Its Coefficients of Impairment in Spastic Paresis

IF 2 Q2 REHABILITATION
Marjolaine Baude MD , Maud Pradines PT, PhD , Caroline Gault-Colas MD , Damien Motavasseli MD , David Simpson MD , Tymothée Poitou MD , Violaine Piquet MD , Pierre-André Natella MD , Jean-Michel Gracies MD, PhD
{"title":"Reliability of the Five Step Assessment and Its Coefficients of Impairment in Spastic Paresis","authors":"Marjolaine Baude MD ,&nbsp;Maud Pradines PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Caroline Gault-Colas MD ,&nbsp;Damien Motavasseli MD ,&nbsp;David Simpson MD ,&nbsp;Tymothée Poitou MD ,&nbsp;Violaine Piquet MD ,&nbsp;Pierre-André Natella MD ,&nbsp;Jean-Michel Gracies MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the intrarater and interrater reliability of the Five Step Assessment (FSA) and its derived coefficients of impairment in chronic spastic paresis.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective observational study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Study of outpatients followed in a rehabilitation department.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>In this single-center prospective study, participants (n=18) with chronic hemiparesis (&gt;1y since injury) were evaluated by 4 raters (3 medical doctors, 1 physiotherapist; experience in hemiparesis, 14±9y).</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>All raters estimated muscle shortening, spasticity, weakness, and fatigability against the resistance of 8 key antagonists in adults twice, one week apart.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>FSA involves measuring 4 angles: angle of arrest at slow speed of stretch (X<sub>V1</sub>), angle of catch or clonus at fast speed of stretch (X<sub>V3</sub>, Tardieu), angle of match between maximal agonist effort and passive and active antagonist resistances (X<sub>A</sub>), residual angle of match after 15 seconds of repeated maximal amplitude active efforts (X<sub>A15</sub>), and spasticity grade Y. Four derived coefficients of impairment were studied: coefficients of shortening, C<sub>SH=</sub>(X<sub>N</sub>−X<sub>V1</sub>)/X<sub>N</sub> (X<sub>N</sub>, normally expected maximal passive joint amplitude); of spasticity, C<sub>SP</sub>=(X<sub>V1</sub>−X<sub>V3</sub>)/X<sub>V1</sub>; of weakness, C<sub>W</sub>=(X<sub>V1</sub>−X<sub>A</sub>)/X<sub>V1</sub>; and of fatigability, C<sub>F</sub>=(X<sub>A</sub>−X<sub>A15</sub>)/X<sub>A</sub>. Both intraclass correlation coefficients and mean differences were calculated for each parameter.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 18 participants (four women), intrarater reliability was good to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient &gt;0.75) for all parameters in all muscles. Interrater reliability was good to excellent for all muscles and parameters except for spasticity grade Y and coefficient of fatigability (moderate).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The 5 parameters and 4 coefficients of impairment of the FSA have moderate-to-excellent intrarater and interrater reliability in chronic spastic paresis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109525000199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To determine the intrarater and interrater reliability of the Five Step Assessment (FSA) and its derived coefficients of impairment in chronic spastic paresis.

Design

Prospective observational study.

Setting

Study of outpatients followed in a rehabilitation department.

Participants

In this single-center prospective study, participants (n=18) with chronic hemiparesis (>1y since injury) were evaluated by 4 raters (3 medical doctors, 1 physiotherapist; experience in hemiparesis, 14±9y).

Interventions

All raters estimated muscle shortening, spasticity, weakness, and fatigability against the resistance of 8 key antagonists in adults twice, one week apart.

Main Outcome Measures

FSA involves measuring 4 angles: angle of arrest at slow speed of stretch (XV1), angle of catch or clonus at fast speed of stretch (XV3, Tardieu), angle of match between maximal agonist effort and passive and active antagonist resistances (XA), residual angle of match after 15 seconds of repeated maximal amplitude active efforts (XA15), and spasticity grade Y. Four derived coefficients of impairment were studied: coefficients of shortening, CSH=(XN−XV1)/XN (XN, normally expected maximal passive joint amplitude); of spasticity, CSP=(XV1−XV3)/XV1; of weakness, CW=(XV1−XA)/XV1; and of fatigability, CF=(XA−XA15)/XA. Both intraclass correlation coefficients and mean differences were calculated for each parameter.

Results

Among 18 participants (four women), intrarater reliability was good to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.75) for all parameters in all muscles. Interrater reliability was good to excellent for all muscles and parameters except for spasticity grade Y and coefficient of fatigability (moderate).

Conclusions

The 5 parameters and 4 coefficients of impairment of the FSA have moderate-to-excellent intrarater and interrater reliability in chronic spastic paresis.
痉挛性轻瘫损伤五步评估及其系数的信度
目的探讨慢性痉挛性轻瘫患者五步评估(FSA)及其衍生系数的内、外信度。前瞻性观察性研究。研究对象为某康复科门诊患者。在这项单中心前瞻性研究中,慢性偏瘫(损伤后1年)的参与者(n=18)由4名评分者(3名医生,1名物理治疗师;偏瘫经验,14±9y)。干预措施:所有评分者对8种主要拮抗剂对成人的肌肉缩短、痉挛、无力和疲劳进行两次评估,间隔一周。主要观察指标fsa包括测量4个角度:慢速拉伸时的阻滞角(XV1)、快速拉伸时的捕获或闭合角(XV3, Tardieu)、最大激动剂努力与被动和主动拮抗剂抗性之间的匹配角(XA)、重复最大振幅主动努力15秒后的剩余匹配角(XA15)和痉挛等级y。缩短系数,CSH=(XN−XV1)/XN (XN,通常期望最大被动关节振幅);痉挛,CSP=(XV1−XV3)/XV1;弱点,CW=(XV1−XA)/XV1;疲劳系数CF=(XA−XA15)/XA。计算各参数的类内相关系数和平均差值。结果18名参与者(4名女性)中,所有肌肉的所有参数的组内信度均为良好至优秀(组内相关系数>;0.75)。除痉挛等级Y和疲劳系数(中等)外,所有肌肉和参数的判读信度均为良好至优异。结论慢性痉挛性轻瘫患者FSA损伤的5个参数和4个系数具有中等至优异的内部和内部信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信