Taylor M. Gauss , Rhys M. Lormand , Matthew A. Yeomans , Julio B. Morales , Cédrick T. Bonnet , Jan M. Hondzinski
{"title":"Characteristics of standing postural sway without vision depend on the action and duration of stretched ankle muscles","authors":"Taylor M. Gauss , Rhys M. Lormand , Matthew A. Yeomans , Julio B. Morales , Cédrick T. Bonnet , Jan M. Hondzinski","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.05.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In the literature, the impact of stretching on postural sway remains unclear. Potential differences across studies involve stretching different muscle groups or stretching muscle groups for different durations, which may alter proprioception abilities and postural sway. We questioned whether flexibility imbalances from short-term stretching of plantar flexors would increase postural sway and proprioception compared to short-term stretching of dorsiflexors and plantar flexors and whether postural sway and proprioception would increase with increased short-term stretch durations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We tested whether stretching opposing ankle muscles (opposed—plantar flexors and dorsiflexors) or non-opposing muscles (non-opposed—plantar flexors) for various times (0 s, 15 s, 30 s, 45 s) could influence standing sway and/or proprioception. Young adults received 2–4 bouts of ankle stretches to discomfort before performing static stance (participants stood still with eyes closed for 45 s on a force plate) and ankle proprioception (participants actively matched remembered ankle angles, measured with a goniometer) tasks after 30 s of opposed versus non-opposed stretching (Experiment 1 A) or various stretch times for non-opposed (Experiment 1B) and opposed (Experiment 2).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Results revealed worse performance, thus increased variability of medio-lateral (ML) center of pressure (CoP) and lower ML CoP sample entropy, indicating less automation of sway, after opposed stretching compared to no stretch and/or non-opposed (Experiment 1 A) as well as increased ML CoP displacement and variability of ML CoP and lower ML CoP sample entropy after 45 s of opposed stretches compared to no stretch (Experiment 2). Stretching did not significantly influence proprioception; however, proprioception error negatively correlated with variability of ML CoP and ML CoP displacement.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The better ability to actively reproduce ankle positioning associates with a better internal sense of position and encourages an internal focus on movement, known to increase postural sway. Care should be taken with stretched-induced hypermobility in a balance-challenged environment like that with eyes closed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"121 ","pages":"Pages 209-216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225002292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
In the literature, the impact of stretching on postural sway remains unclear. Potential differences across studies involve stretching different muscle groups or stretching muscle groups for different durations, which may alter proprioception abilities and postural sway. We questioned whether flexibility imbalances from short-term stretching of plantar flexors would increase postural sway and proprioception compared to short-term stretching of dorsiflexors and plantar flexors and whether postural sway and proprioception would increase with increased short-term stretch durations.
Methods
We tested whether stretching opposing ankle muscles (opposed—plantar flexors and dorsiflexors) or non-opposing muscles (non-opposed—plantar flexors) for various times (0 s, 15 s, 30 s, 45 s) could influence standing sway and/or proprioception. Young adults received 2–4 bouts of ankle stretches to discomfort before performing static stance (participants stood still with eyes closed for 45 s on a force plate) and ankle proprioception (participants actively matched remembered ankle angles, measured with a goniometer) tasks after 30 s of opposed versus non-opposed stretching (Experiment 1 A) or various stretch times for non-opposed (Experiment 1B) and opposed (Experiment 2).
Results
Results revealed worse performance, thus increased variability of medio-lateral (ML) center of pressure (CoP) and lower ML CoP sample entropy, indicating less automation of sway, after opposed stretching compared to no stretch and/or non-opposed (Experiment 1 A) as well as increased ML CoP displacement and variability of ML CoP and lower ML CoP sample entropy after 45 s of opposed stretches compared to no stretch (Experiment 2). Stretching did not significantly influence proprioception; however, proprioception error negatively correlated with variability of ML CoP and ML CoP displacement.
Discussion
The better ability to actively reproduce ankle positioning associates with a better internal sense of position and encourages an internal focus on movement, known to increase postural sway. Care should be taken with stretched-induced hypermobility in a balance-challenged environment like that with eyes closed.
期刊介绍:
Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance.
The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.