Predictors of Medicaid managed care plan performance on opioid use disorder treatment quality metrics

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Maureen T. Stewart , Sage R. Feltus , Christina Andrews , Dominic Hodgkin , Cindy Parks Thomas , Constance M. Horgan
{"title":"Predictors of Medicaid managed care plan performance on opioid use disorder treatment quality metrics","authors":"Maureen T. Stewart ,&nbsp;Sage R. Feltus ,&nbsp;Christina Andrews ,&nbsp;Dominic Hodgkin ,&nbsp;Cindy Parks Thomas ,&nbsp;Constance M. Horgan","doi":"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Medicaid managed care plans (MCPs) and states play essential roles in supporting access to high-quality opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment services. This study aimed to identify MCP and state-level policies associated with better plan performance on indicators of quality OUD treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Publicly available data on Medicaid MCPs’ profit status, behavioral health contracting arrangements, market share, buprenorphine prior authorization and quantity limit policies and state Medicaid policies were linked with plan-level measures of OUD treatment quality from the National Committee on Quality Assurance (n = 107). Regression analyses were used to examine associations between Medicaid MCP characteristics, MCP buprenorphine policies, and features of the state policy environment with plan-level rates of OUD treatment initiation and engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average OUD treatment initiation rate was 59.6 % and engagement was 30.9 %. MCPs with large market share had initiation and engagement rates 4.66 and 4.54 percentage points lower, respectively, than plans with small market share. Plans operating in states with 1115 SUD waivers had initiation and engagement rates 7.75 and 8.55 percentage points higher, respectively, than plans in states without waivers. Engagement rates among plans that required prior authorization for buprenorphine were 4.53 percentage points lower than plans without this restriction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Findings suggest state and MCP policies are important pathways to improve initial and sustained OUD treatment. Further research into these relationships is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11322,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence","volume":"274 ","pages":"Article 112742"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871625001954","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Medicaid managed care plans (MCPs) and states play essential roles in supporting access to high-quality opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment services. This study aimed to identify MCP and state-level policies associated with better plan performance on indicators of quality OUD treatment.

Methods

Publicly available data on Medicaid MCPs’ profit status, behavioral health contracting arrangements, market share, buprenorphine prior authorization and quantity limit policies and state Medicaid policies were linked with plan-level measures of OUD treatment quality from the National Committee on Quality Assurance (n = 107). Regression analyses were used to examine associations between Medicaid MCP characteristics, MCP buprenorphine policies, and features of the state policy environment with plan-level rates of OUD treatment initiation and engagement.

Results

The average OUD treatment initiation rate was 59.6 % and engagement was 30.9 %. MCPs with large market share had initiation and engagement rates 4.66 and 4.54 percentage points lower, respectively, than plans with small market share. Plans operating in states with 1115 SUD waivers had initiation and engagement rates 7.75 and 8.55 percentage points higher, respectively, than plans in states without waivers. Engagement rates among plans that required prior authorization for buprenorphine were 4.53 percentage points lower than plans without this restriction.

Conclusions

Findings suggest state and MCP policies are important pathways to improve initial and sustained OUD treatment. Further research into these relationships is needed.
医疗补助管理医疗计划对阿片类药物使用障碍治疗质量指标的预测
医疗补助管理计划(mcp)和各州在支持获得高质量阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)治疗服务方面发挥着至关重要的作用。本研究旨在确定MCP和州级政策与优质OUD治疗指标的更好计划绩效相关。方法将医疗补助mcp的盈利状况、行为健康合同安排、市场份额、丁丙诺啡事先授权和数量限制政策以及州医疗补助政策等公开数据与国家质量保证委员会(n = 107)的OUD治疗质量计划级措施联系起来。回归分析用于检验医疗补助MCP特征、MCP丁丙诺啡政策和州政策环境特征与不良反应治疗开始和参与的计划水平率之间的关系。结果平均OUD治疗起始率为59.6%,介入率为30.9%。市场份额大的mcp的启动率和参与率分别比市场份额小的mcp低4.66和4.54个百分点。在拥有1115个SUD豁免的州,计划的启动率和参与率分别比没有豁免的州高7.75和8.55个百分点。要求事先授权使用丁丙诺啡的计划的参与率比没有这一限制的计划低4.53个百分点。结论国家和MCP政策是改善初始和持续OUD治疗的重要途径。需要对这些关系进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence
Drug and alcohol dependence 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
409
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Dependence is an international journal devoted to publishing original research, scholarly reviews, commentaries, and policy analyses in the area of drug, alcohol and tobacco use and dependence. Articles range from studies of the chemistry of substances of abuse, their actions at molecular and cellular sites, in vitro and in vivo investigations of their biochemical, pharmacological and behavioural actions, laboratory-based and clinical research in humans, substance abuse treatment and prevention research, and studies employing methods from epidemiology, sociology, and economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信