Joint Effects of Wildfire Smoke and Extreme Heat on Hospitalizations in California, 2011–2020

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Geohealth Pub Date : 2025-06-06 DOI:10.1029/2024GH001237
Caitlin G. Jones-Ngo, Rebecca J. Schmidt, Erwan Monier, Sara Ludwick, Mohammad Z. Al-Hamdan, Jason Vargo, Kathryn C. Conlon
{"title":"Joint Effects of Wildfire Smoke and Extreme Heat on Hospitalizations in California, 2011–2020","authors":"Caitlin G. Jones-Ngo,&nbsp;Rebecca J. Schmidt,&nbsp;Erwan Monier,&nbsp;Sara Ludwick,&nbsp;Mohammad Z. Al-Hamdan,&nbsp;Jason Vargo,&nbsp;Kathryn C. Conlon","doi":"10.1029/2024GH001237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wildfire smoke and extreme heat events are worsening in California, but their combined health effects are not well understood. This study estimates joint effects of extreme heat and wildfire smoke on hospitalizations in California, 2011–2020. We used a case crossover design with time-stratified controls and conditional logistic regression to estimate these effects at multiplicative and additive scales. Exposures were assessed for 16 combinations of exposure lags (0–3 days) for extreme heat and wildfire influenced fine particulate matter. Among over 28 million cases of all-natural cause morbidity, the majority were adults aged 65 and older (41.4%), English speakers (85.1%), and White, non-Hispanic (49.7%), mostly residing in urban areas (97.2%). The study found roughly 8% of respiratory morbidities (95% CI, 2.4%–13.8%) were attributable to the interaction of wildfire smoke and extreme heat. Significant joint effects were also observed for cardiovascular (5.5%) and renal morbidities (6.2%). Subgroup analyses revealed stronger effects: Respiratory (19.2%, 95% CI 6.5%–32.1%) and cerebrovascular morbidities (15.7%, 95% CI 4%–27.4%) were most pronounced in Black individuals; older adults (50–64 years) showed strong effects for renal morbidities (15.4%, 95% CI −1.6%−32.6%); and cardiovascular effects were highest among females (9.8%, 95% CI 2.9%–16.7%). Effects on all-natural cause morbidity were generally null. The interaction of wildfire smoke and extreme heat within a short exposure window (4 days) increases hospitalizations; highlighting the need for joint heat and wildfire smoke interventions that target populations at greater risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":48618,"journal":{"name":"Geohealth","volume":"9 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GH001237","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geohealth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GH001237","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wildfire smoke and extreme heat events are worsening in California, but their combined health effects are not well understood. This study estimates joint effects of extreme heat and wildfire smoke on hospitalizations in California, 2011–2020. We used a case crossover design with time-stratified controls and conditional logistic regression to estimate these effects at multiplicative and additive scales. Exposures were assessed for 16 combinations of exposure lags (0–3 days) for extreme heat and wildfire influenced fine particulate matter. Among over 28 million cases of all-natural cause morbidity, the majority were adults aged 65 and older (41.4%), English speakers (85.1%), and White, non-Hispanic (49.7%), mostly residing in urban areas (97.2%). The study found roughly 8% of respiratory morbidities (95% CI, 2.4%–13.8%) were attributable to the interaction of wildfire smoke and extreme heat. Significant joint effects were also observed for cardiovascular (5.5%) and renal morbidities (6.2%). Subgroup analyses revealed stronger effects: Respiratory (19.2%, 95% CI 6.5%–32.1%) and cerebrovascular morbidities (15.7%, 95% CI 4%–27.4%) were most pronounced in Black individuals; older adults (50–64 years) showed strong effects for renal morbidities (15.4%, 95% CI −1.6%−32.6%); and cardiovascular effects were highest among females (9.8%, 95% CI 2.9%–16.7%). Effects on all-natural cause morbidity were generally null. The interaction of wildfire smoke and extreme heat within a short exposure window (4 days) increases hospitalizations; highlighting the need for joint heat and wildfire smoke interventions that target populations at greater risk.

2011-2020年加州野火烟雾和极端高温对住院治疗的共同影响
野火烟雾和极端高温事件在加州正在恶化,但它们对健康的综合影响尚不清楚。本研究估计了2011-2020年加州极端高温和野火烟雾对住院治疗的共同影响。我们使用时间分层对照和条件逻辑回归的病例交叉设计来估计乘法和加性尺度上的这些影响。对极端高温和野火影响的细颗粒物的16种暴露滞后(0-3天)组合进行了暴露评估。在超过2800万的全自然原因发病病例中,大多数是65岁及以上的成年人(41.4%),英语使用者(85.1%)和白人,非西班牙裔(49.7%),主要居住在城市地区(97.2%)。研究发现,大约8%的呼吸系统疾病(95% CI, 2.4%-13.8%)可归因于野火烟雾和极端高温的相互作用。在心血管疾病(5.5%)和肾脏疾病(6.2%)方面也观察到显著的联合效应。亚组分析显示更强的影响:呼吸(19.2%,95% CI 6.5%-32.1%)和脑血管发病率(15.7%,95% CI 4%-27.4%)在黑人中最为显著;老年人(50-64岁)对肾脏疾病有较强的影响(15.4%,95% CI - 1.6% - 32.6%);和心血管效应在女性中最高(9.8%,95% CI 2.9%-16.7%)。对全自然原因发病率的影响一般为零。在短暴露窗口(4天)内,野火烟雾和极端高温的相互作用增加了住院率;强调需要针对风险较大的人群采取高温和野火烟雾联合干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geohealth
Geohealth Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: GeoHealth will publish original research, reviews, policy discussions, and commentaries that cover the growing science on the interface among the Earth, atmospheric, oceans and environmental sciences, ecology, and the agricultural and health sciences. The journal will cover a wide variety of global and local issues including the impacts of climate change on human, agricultural, and ecosystem health, air and water pollution, environmental persistence of herbicides and pesticides, radiation and health, geomedicine, and the health effects of disasters. Many of these topics and others are of critical importance in the developing world and all require bringing together leading research across multiple disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信