Comparing terrestrial laser scanner and ground-based structure from motion photogrammetry for urban sinkhole characterization and monitoring in Zaragoza, Spain

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Jorge Sevil-Aguareles, Francisco Gutiérrez, Alfonso Benito-Calvo
{"title":"Comparing terrestrial laser scanner and ground-based structure from motion photogrammetry for urban sinkhole characterization and monitoring in Zaragoza, Spain","authors":"Jorge Sevil-Aguareles,&nbsp;Francisco Gutiérrez,&nbsp;Alfonso Benito-Calvo","doi":"10.1002/esp.70108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Delimiting, characterizing and monitoring active sinkholes in urban areas are fundamental steps for effectively managing the associated risks. These high-exposure scenarios require accurate data on hazard parameters (e.g., spatially distributed subsidence rates), but the current investigation and monitoring techniques for sinkholes remain relatively undeveloped in comparison to other geological hazards, such as landslides. In this regard, we present the first comparative analysis of the performance of terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) and ground-based structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetry for delimiting the actively deforming areas and characterizing the spatial patterns of ground displacement through the comparison of two pairs of high-resolution 3D point clouds. To assess their performance, this work utilizes vertical displacement data measured by high-precision levelling. The main finding is that, despite TLS providing displacement data with less noise and internal distortion, the less expensive and easier-to-implement SfM photogrammetry using ground-based conventional cameras yields a comparable performance when accurate geodetic data is available. However, according to high-precision levelling data, both techniques may underestimate the extent and rate of the deformation. According to levelling data, the active sinkhole has a major axis 60 m long, while the length detected by TLS and SfM photogrammetry drops to 21 and 17 m, respectively. Maximum subsidence rates by levelling, TLS and SfM were 22.9, 17.2 and 15.2 mm/year, respectively. These results indicate that there is still a need to complement these high-resolution techniques with the use of high-precision methods such as levelling or additional geodetic benchmarks.</p>","PeriodicalId":11408,"journal":{"name":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","volume":"50 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/esp.70108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Delimiting, characterizing and monitoring active sinkholes in urban areas are fundamental steps for effectively managing the associated risks. These high-exposure scenarios require accurate data on hazard parameters (e.g., spatially distributed subsidence rates), but the current investigation and monitoring techniques for sinkholes remain relatively undeveloped in comparison to other geological hazards, such as landslides. In this regard, we present the first comparative analysis of the performance of terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) and ground-based structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetry for delimiting the actively deforming areas and characterizing the spatial patterns of ground displacement through the comparison of two pairs of high-resolution 3D point clouds. To assess their performance, this work utilizes vertical displacement data measured by high-precision levelling. The main finding is that, despite TLS providing displacement data with less noise and internal distortion, the less expensive and easier-to-implement SfM photogrammetry using ground-based conventional cameras yields a comparable performance when accurate geodetic data is available. However, according to high-precision levelling data, both techniques may underestimate the extent and rate of the deformation. According to levelling data, the active sinkhole has a major axis 60 m long, while the length detected by TLS and SfM photogrammetry drops to 21 and 17 m, respectively. Maximum subsidence rates by levelling, TLS and SfM were 22.9, 17.2 and 15.2 mm/year, respectively. These results indicate that there is still a need to complement these high-resolution techniques with the use of high-precision methods such as levelling or additional geodetic benchmarks.

比较西班牙萨拉戈萨城市天坑特征和监测的地面激光扫描仪和地面运动摄影测量结构
划定、描述和监测城市地区活跃的天坑是有效管理相关风险的基本步骤。这些高暴露情景需要关于灾害参数的准确数据(例如,空间分布的沉降率),但与其他地质灾害(如滑坡)相比,目前对天坑的调查和监测技术仍然相对落后。在这方面,我们首次对地面激光扫描仪(TLS)和地面运动结构摄影测量(SfM)的性能进行了比较分析,通过对两对高分辨率3D点云的比较,划定了活跃变形区域,并表征了地面位移的空间模式。为了评估它们的性能,这项工作利用高精度水准测量的垂直位移数据。主要发现是,尽管TLS提供的位移数据噪声和内部失真更少,但使用地面传统相机的更便宜、更容易实现的SfM摄影测量在获得精确的大地测量数据时也能产生相当的性能。然而,根据高精度找平数据,这两种技术都可能低估变形的程度和速率。根据水准测量数据,活动天坑的长轴长度为60 m,而TLS和SfM摄影测量检测到的长度分别为21 m和17 m。平整、TLS和SfM的最大沉降速率分别为22.9、17.2和15.2 mm/年。这些结果表明,仍然需要使用高精度方法来补充这些高分辨率技术,例如找平或额外的大地测量基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.10%
发文量
215
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms is an interdisciplinary international journal concerned with: the interactions between surface processes and landforms and landscapes; that lead to physical, chemical and biological changes; and which in turn create; current landscapes and the geological record of past landscapes. Its focus is core to both physical geographical and geological communities, and also the wider geosciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信