Laure F Pittet, Emily K Forbes, Susan Donath, Kate L Francis, Kaya Gardiner, Katie L Flanagan, Anne-Louise Ponsonby, Roy Robins-Browne, Frank Shann, Mike South, Peter Vuillermin, Dan Casalaz, Nigel Curtis, Nicole L Messina
{"title":"Neonatal BCG vaccination to prevent asthma: Results from the MIS BAIR randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Laure F Pittet, Emily K Forbes, Susan Donath, Kate L Francis, Kaya Gardiner, Katie L Flanagan, Anne-Louise Ponsonby, Roy Robins-Browne, Frank Shann, Mike South, Peter Vuillermin, Dan Casalaz, Nigel Curtis, Nicole L Messina","doi":"10.1111/pai.70110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asthma has a significant impact worldwide, but prevention strategies remain limited. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of neonatal BCG vaccination in preventing asthma by modulating early-life immunity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Melbourne Infant Study: BCG for Allergy and Infection Reduction (MIS BAIR) was a phase 3 multicentre randomized controlled trial in Victoria, Australia. Infants were randomly assigned to receive the BCG-Denmark vaccine or no intervention within 10 days of birth. The incidence of asthma at 5 years of age was estimated using the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood questions.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrial: </strong>gov (NCT01906853).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1272 infants were randomized. The adjusted incidence of asthma was 14.4% in the BCG group compared to 16.0% in the control group (adjusted risk difference [aRD] -1.7 percentage points; 95%CI -7.4, 3.9). Secondary outcomes, including severe asthma and use of preventer medication, showed similar trends, with an aRD of -3.9 (95%CI -7.7, 0.0), and -5.6 (95%CI -10.9, -0.4), respectively, favoring the BCG group. Among participants with one or both parents asthmatic, the rate of asthma was also lower in the BCG group (17.6%) compared with the control group (24.7%; aRD -7.2; 95%CI -15.9, 1.5), although a test for interaction was not significant (p = .07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the point estimates suggested BCG vaccination might protect against asthma, the wide uncertainty around the estimates means further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to evaluate the long-term benefits of BCG vaccination beyond its primary indication.</p>","PeriodicalId":520742,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology","volume":"36 6","pages":"e70110"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12136015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.70110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Asthma has a significant impact worldwide, but prevention strategies remain limited. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of neonatal BCG vaccination in preventing asthma by modulating early-life immunity.
Methods: The Melbourne Infant Study: BCG for Allergy and Infection Reduction (MIS BAIR) was a phase 3 multicentre randomized controlled trial in Victoria, Australia. Infants were randomly assigned to receive the BCG-Denmark vaccine or no intervention within 10 days of birth. The incidence of asthma at 5 years of age was estimated using the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood questions.
Clinicaltrial: gov (NCT01906853).
Results: A total of 1272 infants were randomized. The adjusted incidence of asthma was 14.4% in the BCG group compared to 16.0% in the control group (adjusted risk difference [aRD] -1.7 percentage points; 95%CI -7.4, 3.9). Secondary outcomes, including severe asthma and use of preventer medication, showed similar trends, with an aRD of -3.9 (95%CI -7.7, 0.0), and -5.6 (95%CI -10.9, -0.4), respectively, favoring the BCG group. Among participants with one or both parents asthmatic, the rate of asthma was also lower in the BCG group (17.6%) compared with the control group (24.7%; aRD -7.2; 95%CI -15.9, 1.5), although a test for interaction was not significant (p = .07).
Conclusions: While the point estimates suggested BCG vaccination might protect against asthma, the wide uncertainty around the estimates means further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to evaluate the long-term benefits of BCG vaccination beyond its primary indication.