Safety in MR-enhanced daily adaptive SBRT Radiotherapy using a conventional C-arm linear accelerator: An FMEA approach.

Lotte Wilke, Sebastian M Christ, Riccardo Dal Bello, Elizabeth Denney, Silvia Fabiano, Hubert S Gabryś, Klara Kefer, Michael Mayinger, Ina Nilo, Sophie Perryck, Jens von der Grün, Matthias Guckenberger, Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
{"title":"Safety in MR-enhanced daily adaptive SBRT Radiotherapy using a conventional C-arm linear accelerator: An FMEA approach.","authors":"Lotte Wilke, Sebastian M Christ, Riccardo Dal Bello, Elizabeth Denney, Silvia Fabiano, Hubert S Gabryś, Klara Kefer, Michael Mayinger, Ina Nilo, Sophie Perryck, Jens von der Grün, Matthias Guckenberger, Stephanie Tanadini-Lang","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2025.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>MR-guided adaptive Radiotherapy has the potential to compensate for interfractional changes in patient anatomy. Modern hybrid devices, which combine MR and linear accelerator technologies, have been clinically implemented but their costs may prevent broad adoption. To accelerate the adoption of MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy, we developed a workflow for MR-enhanced daily adaptive Radiotherapy on a C-arm linac using a dedicated MR simulator and a patient transfer shuttle system. A failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) was performed to identify possible risks in this newly developed workflow.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A workflow for MR-enhanced daily adaptive SBRT (MEDAS) on a Varian Truebeam linac was developed using a stand-alone 1.5T MR-simulator and patient transfer using a shuttle system. The different process steps were conceptualized in a multidisciplinary team and an FMEA of the different process steps was performed as well as measures for mitigation of possible risks were discussed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FMEA identified 23 failure modes across eight process steps, with the majority occurring during base plan preparation and adaptive planning. Seventeen (74%) failure modes were classified as low risk, while six (26%) were assessed as medium risk. No high-risk failure modes were identified. Risk mitigation measures, including workflow automation and checklist enhancements, successfully reduced all failure modes to low risk while not introducing new risks CONCLUSION: We developed a workflow for MEDAS on a conventional C-Arm linac. In this process, an FMEA was performed in a multidisciplinary team. The FMEA identified and addressed six medium-risk failure modes within the MEDAS workflow. Through further automation and adaption of existing checklists, the occurrence- and discover probability was successfully reduced, such that these failure modes are decreased to a low risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":101315,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2025.05.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: MR-guided adaptive Radiotherapy has the potential to compensate for interfractional changes in patient anatomy. Modern hybrid devices, which combine MR and linear accelerator technologies, have been clinically implemented but their costs may prevent broad adoption. To accelerate the adoption of MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy, we developed a workflow for MR-enhanced daily adaptive Radiotherapy on a C-arm linac using a dedicated MR simulator and a patient transfer shuttle system. A failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) was performed to identify possible risks in this newly developed workflow.

Materials and methods: A workflow for MR-enhanced daily adaptive SBRT (MEDAS) on a Varian Truebeam linac was developed using a stand-alone 1.5T MR-simulator and patient transfer using a shuttle system. The different process steps were conceptualized in a multidisciplinary team and an FMEA of the different process steps was performed as well as measures for mitigation of possible risks were discussed.

Results: The FMEA identified 23 failure modes across eight process steps, with the majority occurring during base plan preparation and adaptive planning. Seventeen (74%) failure modes were classified as low risk, while six (26%) were assessed as medium risk. No high-risk failure modes were identified. Risk mitigation measures, including workflow automation and checklist enhancements, successfully reduced all failure modes to low risk while not introducing new risks CONCLUSION: We developed a workflow for MEDAS on a conventional C-Arm linac. In this process, an FMEA was performed in a multidisciplinary team. The FMEA identified and addressed six medium-risk failure modes within the MEDAS workflow. Through further automation and adaption of existing checklists, the occurrence- and discover probability was successfully reduced, such that these failure modes are decreased to a low risk.

使用常规c臂直线加速器的mr增强每日适应性SBRT放疗的安全性:FMEA方法。
背景和目的:磁共振引导下的适应性放疗有可能补偿患者解剖结构的分节间变化。结合了磁共振和线性加速器技术的现代混合设备已经在临床上实施,但其成本可能会阻碍其广泛采用。为了加速采用核磁共振引导的自适应放疗,我们开发了一套在c臂直线机上使用专用核磁共振模拟器和病人转移穿梭系统的核磁共振增强日常自适应放疗工作流程。进行了失效模式和影响分析(FMEA)以识别新开发的工作流程中可能存在的风险。材料和方法:利用独立的1.5T磁共振模拟器和穿梭系统进行患者转移,在瓦里安Truebeam直线加速器上开发了磁共振增强每日自适应SBRT (MEDAS)的工作流程。在一个多学科团队中对不同的过程步骤进行了概念化,并对不同过程步骤进行了FMEA,并讨论了减轻可能风险的措施。结果:FMEA确定了8个过程步骤中的23种失效模式,其中大多数发生在基本计划准备和适应性计划期间。17种(74%)失效模式被归类为低风险,而6种(26%)被评估为中等风险。未发现高风险失效模式。风险缓解措施,包括工作流程自动化和检查表增强,成功地将所有故障模式降低到低风险,同时没有引入新的风险。在此过程中,在一个多学科团队中执行了FMEA。FMEA确定并解决了MEDAS工作流程中的六种中等风险失效模式。通过进一步的自动化和对现有检查表的适应,成功地降低了发生和发现的概率,从而将这些故障模式降低到低风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信