Comparing metal onlay and full crown in root canal treated molars with single proximal defect - An 18-month clinical study.

R Evelyn Benisha, Rathna Piriyanga, I Anand Sherwood, Indhra S Ramanathan, A Azhagu Abirami
{"title":"Comparing metal onlay and full crown in root canal treated molars with single proximal defect - An 18-month clinical study.","authors":"R Evelyn Benisha, Rathna Piriyanga, I Anand Sherwood, Indhra S Ramanathan, A Azhagu Abirami","doi":"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_153_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to compare the survival and success rates of metal onlays and crowns in root canal-treated first and second molars with single proximal defects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 120 patients requiring post-endodontic restoration of molars were randomly assigned into two groups (<i>n</i> = 60 each): metal onlays and metal crowns. Restorations were fabricated using standard protocols and cemented with glass ionomer cement. Patients were followed up for 18 months, with survival defined as the presence of an intact restoration and success as the absence of food impaction. To indicate success, revised FDI criteria are used.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate the restoration survival rate; the Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a survival rate of 95% for onlays and 90% for crowns, with no significant difference (<i>P</i> = 0.294). Success rates were 91.7% for onlays and 90.0% for crowns with no significant difference (<i>P</i> = 0.604). Food impaction was more common when the pretreatment restoration margin was apical to the cementoenamel junction, though not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.167).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Metal onlays and crowns exhibited comparable survival and success rates in root canal-treated first and second molars with single proximal defects.</p>","PeriodicalId":516842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","volume":"28 5","pages":"468-473"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_153_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the survival and success rates of metal onlays and crowns in root canal-treated first and second molars with single proximal defects.

Materials and methods: A total of 120 patients requiring post-endodontic restoration of molars were randomly assigned into two groups (n = 60 each): metal onlays and metal crowns. Restorations were fabricated using standard protocols and cemented with glass ionomer cement. Patients were followed up for 18 months, with survival defined as the presence of an intact restoration and success as the absence of food impaction. To indicate success, revised FDI criteria are used.

Statistical analysis: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate the restoration survival rate; the Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables.

Results: Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a survival rate of 95% for onlays and 90% for crowns, with no significant difference (P = 0.294). Success rates were 91.7% for onlays and 90.0% for crowns with no significant difference (P = 0.604). Food impaction was more common when the pretreatment restoration margin was apical to the cementoenamel junction, though not statistically significant (P = 0.167).

Conclusion: Metal onlays and crowns exhibited comparable survival and success rates in root canal-treated first and second molars with single proximal defects.

金属嵌体与全冠根管治疗单近端缺损磨牙18个月的临床研究。
目的:比较根管治疗的第一磨牙和第二磨牙单近端缺损金属嵌体和牙冠的成活率和成功率。材料与方法:将120例需要进行磨牙根管修复的患者随机分为金属嵌体组和金属冠组,每组各60例。修复体采用标准方案制作,并用玻璃离子水门合剂胶结。患者随访18个月,生存定义为完整修复,成功定义为没有食物嵌塞。为了表明成功,使用了修订的外国直接投资标准。统计学分析:采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析评价修复存活率;分类变量比较采用卡方检验。结果:Kaplan-Meier分析显示,全冠和冠的存活率分别为95%和90%,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.294)。纯牙和冠的成功率分别为91.7%和90.0%,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.604)。当预处理修复边缘位于牙髓-牙釉质交界处时,食物嵌塞更常见,但无统计学意义(P = 0.167)。结论:金属嵌体和牙冠在根管治疗的第一磨牙和第二磨牙中具有相当的存活率和成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信