Is the Meibopatch Heated Pad Useful in Treating Patients with Meibomian Gland-Related Dry Eye Disease? - Assessing Tolerability, Acceptance, and Effectiveness.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-05-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S508547
Tasneem Elghazali Bakhiet, Abdus Samad Ansari, Gwyn Samuel Williams, Mahmoud Husseiny Awad, Alistair Thomas
{"title":"Is the Meibopatch Heated Pad Useful in Treating Patients with Meibomian Gland-Related Dry Eye Disease? - Assessing Tolerability, Acceptance, and Effectiveness.","authors":"Tasneem Elghazali Bakhiet, Abdus Samad Ansari, Gwyn Samuel Williams, Mahmoud Husseiny Awad, Alistair Thomas","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S508547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dry Eye Syndrome (DES) significantly impacts vision-related quality of life and poses a substantial financial burden in ophthalmology practice globally. Projected expenditure on DES treatments is estimated to exceed 6.6 billion USD by 2027. The Meibopatch (VISUfarma International, Valbonne, France) represents one of the latest devices designed to enhance treatment adherence and aid in managing Dry Eye Syndrome (DES). However, its long-term acceptance and efficacy among patients with posterior blepharitis, a condition closely linked with Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), has yet to be demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with symptomatic non-responsive blepharitis were enrolled during clinic visits and asked to self-administer Meibopatch treatment for four weeks. The ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire was utilized to evaluate symptoms both at baseline and following the four-week treatment period. Supplementary assessments on acceptability and tolerability were conducted through post-treatment questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 43 patients were recruited. The baseline pre-treatment OSDI score ± SD (Standard Deviation) was 47.9±16.4, while the post-treatment OSDI value + SD was 37.7±14.9. Analysis revealed a significant mean difference between pre- and post-treatment OSDI scores (p=0.0005), indicating notable symptomatic improvement over the assessment duration. However, the findings diverged from evaluations of acceptability and overall patient satisfaction with the Meibopatch.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that Meibopatch represents a safe therapeutic option for managing DES. However, the controversy arises from the incongruence between the substantial reduction in symptoms noted from the OSDI scores and the reported patient outcomes regarding satisfaction and effectiveness. Future efforts should focus on validating the OSDI in blepharitis patients and establishing patient-centered outcomes in the realm of DES.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"1743-1749"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12132065/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S508547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dry Eye Syndrome (DES) significantly impacts vision-related quality of life and poses a substantial financial burden in ophthalmology practice globally. Projected expenditure on DES treatments is estimated to exceed 6.6 billion USD by 2027. The Meibopatch (VISUfarma International, Valbonne, France) represents one of the latest devices designed to enhance treatment adherence and aid in managing Dry Eye Syndrome (DES). However, its long-term acceptance and efficacy among patients with posterior blepharitis, a condition closely linked with Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), has yet to be demonstrated.

Methods: Patients with symptomatic non-responsive blepharitis were enrolled during clinic visits and asked to self-administer Meibopatch treatment for four weeks. The ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire was utilized to evaluate symptoms both at baseline and following the four-week treatment period. Supplementary assessments on acceptability and tolerability were conducted through post-treatment questionnaires.

Results: A total of 43 patients were recruited. The baseline pre-treatment OSDI score ± SD (Standard Deviation) was 47.9±16.4, while the post-treatment OSDI value + SD was 37.7±14.9. Analysis revealed a significant mean difference between pre- and post-treatment OSDI scores (p=0.0005), indicating notable symptomatic improvement over the assessment duration. However, the findings diverged from evaluations of acceptability and overall patient satisfaction with the Meibopatch.

Conclusion: The results suggest that Meibopatch represents a safe therapeutic option for managing DES. However, the controversy arises from the incongruence between the substantial reduction in symptoms noted from the OSDI scores and the reported patient outcomes regarding satisfaction and effectiveness. Future efforts should focus on validating the OSDI in blepharitis patients and establishing patient-centered outcomes in the realm of DES.

Meibopatch加热垫治疗Meibomian gland相关性干眼病有用吗?-评估耐受性、接受性和有效性。
背景:干眼综合征(DES)显著影响视力相关的生活质量,并在全球眼科实践中造成了巨大的经济负担。到2027年,DES治疗的预计支出估计将超过66亿美元。Meibopatch (VISUfarma International, Valbonne, France)是旨在提高治疗依从性和帮助治疗干眼综合征(DES)的最新设备之一。然而,它在与睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)密切相关的后睑炎患者中的长期接受性和疗效尚未得到证实。方法:对有症状的无反应性睑缘炎患者进行临床访视,并要求患者自行进行为期四周的Meibopatch治疗。眼表疾病指数(OSDI)问卷用于评估基线和四周治疗期后的症状。通过治疗后问卷对可接受性和耐受性进行补充评估。结果:共纳入43例患者。基线治疗前OSDI评分±SD(标准差)为47.9±16.4,治疗后OSDI评分+ SD为37.7±14.9。分析显示治疗前和治疗后OSDI评分的平均差异显著(p=0.0005),表明在评估期间症状有显著改善。然而,研究结果偏离了对Meibopatch的可接受性和总体患者满意度的评估。结论:结果表明Meibopatch是治疗DES的一种安全的治疗选择。然而,争议源于OSDI评分中症状的显著减轻与报告的患者满意度和有效性结果之间的不一致。未来的努力应该集中在验证眼炎患者的OSDI,并在DES领域建立以患者为中心的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信