Gender Differences in Medicare Practice and Payment of Neuroradiologists.

Ajay Malhotra, Chris Lee, Mihir Khunte, Dheeman Futela, Raj Moily, Seyedmehdi Payabvash, Dheeraj Gandhi, Max Wintermark
{"title":"Gender Differences in Medicare Practice and Payment of Neuroradiologists.","authors":"Ajay Malhotra, Chris Lee, Mihir Khunte, Dheeman Futela, Raj Moily, Seyedmehdi Payabvash, Dheeraj Gandhi, Max Wintermark","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Female neuroradiologists in clinical practice are outnumbered by their male counterparts. However, it is unknown whether there are differences in practice patterns and Medicare billing and payment between female and male neuroradiologists. Our aim was to compare representation, practice range, clinical productivity, and Medicare payments for female and male neuroradiologists.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study of Medicare provider and service data was conducted. Male and female neuroradiologists who received Medicare payments from 2017 to 2021 and the services rendered were analyzed. Primary outcome was gender representation, mean payments received from Medicare, charges submitted, and codes billed. <i>T</i> tests and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> tests were used to determine differences in payment and practice volume between male and female radiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2017 to 2021, there were a total of 2701 neuroradiologists, of whom 526 (19.5%) were female, with a higher proportion of women in academic than nonacademic neuroradiology practice (23.3% versus 15.6%, respectively). On average, female neuroradiologists charged less (mean, standard error [SE], $642,489 [$14,756] versus $738,416 [$7800]; <i>P</i> < .001) and were paid less by Medicare (mean [SE], $92,834 [$1877] versus $113,495 [$1044]; <i>P</i> < .001) compared with their male counterparts. By contrast, female neuroradiologists had a higher payment-per-service ratio (mean [SE], 0.232 [0.001] versus 0.208 [0.0003]; <i>P</i> < .001). Women billed fewer median total services (1802; interquartile range [IQR], 925-4726] versus 2461 [IQR, 1268-5781]; <i>P</i> < .001), served fewer median beneficiaries (1232 [IQR, 705-1963] versus 1697 [IQR, 990-2682]; <i>P</i> < .001), and billed fewer median unique codes (19 [IQR, 13-26] versus 23 [IQR, 17-33]; <i>P</i> < .001). Temporal analysis of data across the 5-year study period showed that men consistently received higher payments than women, though the difference in mean Medicare charge (<i>P</i> = .03), mean Medicare payment (<i>P</i> = .04), and median number of services provided (<i>P</i> = .04) between the 2 cohorts is decreasing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Female neuroradiologists were underrepresented, charged less, and received less overall payment compared with their male counterparts. Female neuroradiologists provided a smaller range and number of services, and a greater proportion of female neuroradiologists billed for higher-paying services. Further studies are needed to assess differences in part-time work and subspecialty representation to determine their impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":"46 6","pages":"1093-1099"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152790/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Female neuroradiologists in clinical practice are outnumbered by their male counterparts. However, it is unknown whether there are differences in practice patterns and Medicare billing and payment between female and male neuroradiologists. Our aim was to compare representation, practice range, clinical productivity, and Medicare payments for female and male neuroradiologists.

Materials and methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study of Medicare provider and service data was conducted. Male and female neuroradiologists who received Medicare payments from 2017 to 2021 and the services rendered were analyzed. Primary outcome was gender representation, mean payments received from Medicare, charges submitted, and codes billed. T tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to determine differences in payment and practice volume between male and female radiologists.

Results: From 2017 to 2021, there were a total of 2701 neuroradiologists, of whom 526 (19.5%) were female, with a higher proportion of women in academic than nonacademic neuroradiology practice (23.3% versus 15.6%, respectively). On average, female neuroradiologists charged less (mean, standard error [SE], $642,489 [$14,756] versus $738,416 [$7800]; P < .001) and were paid less by Medicare (mean [SE], $92,834 [$1877] versus $113,495 [$1044]; P < .001) compared with their male counterparts. By contrast, female neuroradiologists had a higher payment-per-service ratio (mean [SE], 0.232 [0.001] versus 0.208 [0.0003]; P < .001). Women billed fewer median total services (1802; interquartile range [IQR], 925-4726] versus 2461 [IQR, 1268-5781]; P < .001), served fewer median beneficiaries (1232 [IQR, 705-1963] versus 1697 [IQR, 990-2682]; P < .001), and billed fewer median unique codes (19 [IQR, 13-26] versus 23 [IQR, 17-33]; P < .001). Temporal analysis of data across the 5-year study period showed that men consistently received higher payments than women, though the difference in mean Medicare charge (P = .03), mean Medicare payment (P = .04), and median number of services provided (P = .04) between the 2 cohorts is decreasing.

Conclusions: Female neuroradiologists were underrepresented, charged less, and received less overall payment compared with their male counterparts. Female neuroradiologists provided a smaller range and number of services, and a greater proportion of female neuroradiologists billed for higher-paying services. Further studies are needed to assess differences in part-time work and subspecialty representation to determine their impact.

神经放射科医师医疗保险实践与报酬的性别差异。
背景与目的:在临床实践中,女性神经放射学家的数量远远超过男性同行。然而,尚不清楚女性和男性神经放射学家在实践模式和医疗保险计费和支付方面是否存在差异。我们的目的是比较女性和男性神经放射科医生的代表性、执业范围、临床生产力和医疗保险支付。材料和方法:对医疗保险提供者和服务数据进行回顾性横断面研究。分析了2017年至2021年接受医疗保险付款的男性和女性神经放射科医生及其提供的服务。主要结果是性别代表性、从医疗保险中收到的平均付款、提交的费用和账单。使用T检验和Mann-Whitney U检验来确定男性和女性放射科医生在报酬和业务量方面的差异。结果:2017 - 2021年,共有2701名神经放射学家,其中女性526名(19.5%),从事学术工作的女性比例高于非学术工作的女性比例(分别为23.3%和15.6%)。平均而言,女性神经放射科医生收费较低(平均标准误差[SE], 642,489美元[14,756美元]对738,416美元[7800美元];P < 0.001),医疗保险支付较少(平均[SE], 92,834美元[1877美元]对113,495美元[1044美元];P < 0.001)。相比之下,女性神经放射科医生的每次服务付费比率更高(平均[SE], 0.232[0.001]对0.208 [0.0003];P < 0.001)。妇女的总服务费用中位数较低(1802;四分位间距[IQR], 925-4726] vs . 2461 [IQR, 1268-5781];P < .001),服务的中位受益人较少(1232人[IQR, 705-1963]对1697人[IQR, 990-2682];P < 0.001),并且中位唯一码较少(19 [IQR, 13-26]对23 [IQR, 17-33];P < 0.001)。对5年研究期间数据的时间分析显示,尽管两个队列之间的平均医疗保险费用(P = .03)、平均医疗保险支付(P = .04)和提供的服务中位数(P = .04)的差异正在减小,但男性始终比女性获得更高的支付。结论:与男性同行相比,女性神经放射科医生的代表性不足,收费较低,总体报酬也较低。女性神经放射科医生提供的服务范围和数量较小,而女性神经放射科医生收取更高费用的比例更大。需要进一步的研究来评估兼职工作和亚专业代表性的差异,以确定它们的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信