Influences on trust in the use of AI-based triage-an interview study with primary healthcare professionals and patients in Sweden.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2025-05-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1565080
Emilie Steerling, Petra Svedberg, Per Nilsen, Elin Siira, Jens Nygren
{"title":"Influences on trust in the use of AI-based triage-an interview study with primary healthcare professionals and patients in Sweden.","authors":"Emilie Steerling, Petra Svedberg, Per Nilsen, Elin Siira, Jens Nygren","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1565080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve the quality and efficiency of medical triage in primary care. However, there are many uncertainties related to its use. Trust in these systems is important for successful integration and advancement into healthcare, yet this remains an understudied issue. Understanding the influences on trust in the actual use of AI is necessary for developing effective implementation strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the influences on trust of healthcare professionals and patients in the use of AI-based triage in primary care in Sweden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied qualitative study design using an inductive approach based on semi-structured interviews with 14 healthcare professionals and 12 patients in two regions in Sweden. The participants had experience of using AI-based triage in primary care. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed with reflexive thematic analysis to explore the influences on trust.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Healthcare professionals and patients experienced three types of influences on their trust in the use of AI-based triage in primary care: (1) provision of accurate patient information, (2) alignment with clinical expertise, and (3) supervision of patients' health and safety. Their experiences across these themes varied only in terms of the influence of experience-based knowledge. Both healthcare professionals and patients emphasized the importance of constructive dialogue, along with clear instructions for the use and storage of information.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results demonstrate that building trust in AI requires improved interaction to ensure that the system is adapted to the users' competencies and level of expertise. The generalizability of these insights is limited to AI-based triage in primary care in Sweden. Future research should explore trust in AI across different healthcare settings to inform policy, as well as to ensure safe use and design of AI applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1565080"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1565080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve the quality and efficiency of medical triage in primary care. However, there are many uncertainties related to its use. Trust in these systems is important for successful integration and advancement into healthcare, yet this remains an understudied issue. Understanding the influences on trust in the actual use of AI is necessary for developing effective implementation strategies.

Objective: This study aimed to explore the influences on trust of healthcare professionals and patients in the use of AI-based triage in primary care in Sweden.

Methods: We applied qualitative study design using an inductive approach based on semi-structured interviews with 14 healthcare professionals and 12 patients in two regions in Sweden. The participants had experience of using AI-based triage in primary care. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed with reflexive thematic analysis to explore the influences on trust.

Results: Healthcare professionals and patients experienced three types of influences on their trust in the use of AI-based triage in primary care: (1) provision of accurate patient information, (2) alignment with clinical expertise, and (3) supervision of patients' health and safety. Their experiences across these themes varied only in terms of the influence of experience-based knowledge. Both healthcare professionals and patients emphasized the importance of constructive dialogue, along with clear instructions for the use and storage of information.

Conclusions: The results demonstrate that building trust in AI requires improved interaction to ensure that the system is adapted to the users' competencies and level of expertise. The generalizability of these insights is limited to AI-based triage in primary care in Sweden. Future research should explore trust in AI across different healthcare settings to inform policy, as well as to ensure safe use and design of AI applications.

使用基于人工智能的分诊对信任的影响——对瑞典初级卫生保健专业人员和患者的访谈研究
导读:人工智能(AI)有可能提高初级保健医疗分诊的质量和效率。然而,它的使用有许多不确定因素。对这些系统的信任对于成功整合和推进医疗保健非常重要,但这仍然是一个未充分研究的问题。了解人工智能在实际使用中对信任的影响对于制定有效的实施策略是必要的。目的:本研究旨在探讨在瑞典的初级保健中使用基于人工智能的分诊对卫生保健专业人员和患者信任的影响。方法:我们采用定性研究设计,采用归纳方法,对瑞典两个地区的14名医疗保健专业人员和12名患者进行半结构化访谈。参与者有在初级保健中使用基于人工智能的分诊的经验。访谈内容逐字抄录,并以反身性专题分析探讨对信任的影响。结果:医疗保健专业人员和患者对在初级保健中使用基于人工智能的分诊的信任经历了三种类型的影响:(1)提供准确的患者信息,(2)与临床专业知识保持一致,(3)对患者健康和安全的监督。他们在这些主题上的经验仅在基于经验的知识的影响方面有所不同。医疗保健专业人员和患者都强调了建设性对话的重要性,以及对信息使用和存储的明确指示。结论:研究结果表明,建立对人工智能的信任需要改进交互,以确保系统适应用户的能力和专业水平。这些见解的普遍性仅限于瑞典初级保健中基于人工智能的分诊。未来的研究应该探索在不同的医疗环境中对人工智能的信任,为政策提供信息,并确保人工智能应用程序的安全使用和设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信