Adapting, Sustaining and Scaling Violence against Women and Children Prevention Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review on the Use of Implementation Science.

IF 5.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Kathryn L Falb, Alexandra Blackwell, Manya Balanchander, Christine Bourey, Christina T Yuan, Michele R Decker
{"title":"Adapting, Sustaining and Scaling Violence against Women and Children Prevention Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review on the Use of Implementation Science.","authors":"Kathryn L Falb, Alexandra Blackwell, Manya Balanchander, Christine Bourey, Christina T Yuan, Michele R Decker","doi":"10.1177/15248380251340640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The field of violence against women and children (VAW/C) prevention has made significant progress in identifying effective strategies to prevent violence. However, there are still gaps in understanding how to sustain and scale evidence-based interventions across diverse settings. At the same time, implementation science offers approaches that could help achieve greater scale, sustainability, and equity. Despite its potential, implementation science approaches have not been fully applied to VAW/C research. To address this gap, a scoping review was conducted to identify the frameworks employed, understand the most frequently studied implementation domains, examine any specific challenges captured within the applied implementation science frameworks related to delivering survivor-centered violence prevention programming, and illuminate the role of practice-based knowledge within implementation science efforts for violence prevention programming. The review, conducted between 2023 and 2024, identified 40 VAW/C evaluation studies that included implementation or process evaluation components, with most studies published after 2020. Commonly used implementation science frameworks included the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) model, and the Medical Research Council (MRC) frameworks. Key implementation domains studied were fidelity, acceptability, and feasibility. However, scale and sustainability-critical priorities for practitioners, policymakers, and donors-were only minimally addressed in the literature. In addition, there was limited focus on implementing survivor-centered practices and incorporating practice-based knowledge. The findings highlight the need for long-term collaborations between researchers and practitioners that explicitly integrate implementation science. Such partnerships could help adapt, scale, and sustain evidence-based VAW/C prevention programs more effectively while ensuring they remain survivor-centered.</p>","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"15248380251340640"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251340640","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The field of violence against women and children (VAW/C) prevention has made significant progress in identifying effective strategies to prevent violence. However, there are still gaps in understanding how to sustain and scale evidence-based interventions across diverse settings. At the same time, implementation science offers approaches that could help achieve greater scale, sustainability, and equity. Despite its potential, implementation science approaches have not been fully applied to VAW/C research. To address this gap, a scoping review was conducted to identify the frameworks employed, understand the most frequently studied implementation domains, examine any specific challenges captured within the applied implementation science frameworks related to delivering survivor-centered violence prevention programming, and illuminate the role of practice-based knowledge within implementation science efforts for violence prevention programming. The review, conducted between 2023 and 2024, identified 40 VAW/C evaluation studies that included implementation or process evaluation components, with most studies published after 2020. Commonly used implementation science frameworks included the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) model, and the Medical Research Council (MRC) frameworks. Key implementation domains studied were fidelity, acceptability, and feasibility. However, scale and sustainability-critical priorities for practitioners, policymakers, and donors-were only minimally addressed in the literature. In addition, there was limited focus on implementing survivor-centered practices and incorporating practice-based knowledge. The findings highlight the need for long-term collaborations between researchers and practitioners that explicitly integrate implementation science. Such partnerships could help adapt, scale, and sustain evidence-based VAW/C prevention programs more effectively while ensuring they remain survivor-centered.

在低收入和中等收入国家调整、维持和扩大针对妇女和儿童的暴力预防干预措施:对实施科学使用的范围审查。
预防对妇女和儿童的暴力行为领域在确定预防暴力的有效战略方面取得了重大进展。然而,在了解如何在不同环境中维持和扩大基于证据的干预措施方面仍存在差距。与此同时,实施科学提供了有助于实现更大规模、可持续性和公平性的方法。尽管具有潜力,但实施科学方法尚未完全应用于VAW/C研究。为了解决这一差距,进行了范围审查,以确定所采用的框架,了解最常研究的实施领域,检查与提供以幸存者为中心的暴力预防规划有关的应用实施科学框架中捕获的任何具体挑战,并阐明基于实践的知识在暴力预防规划的实施科学工作中的作用。该审查在2023年至2024年期间进行,确定了40项VAW/C评估研究,其中包括实施或过程评估部分,其中大多数研究在2020年之后发表。常用的实施科学框架包括实施研究综合框架(CFIR)、探索、准备、实施和维持(EPIS)模型和医学研究委员会(MRC)框架。研究的关键实现领域是保真度、可接受性和可行性。然而,规模和可持续性——从业者、政策制定者和捐助者的关键优先事项——在文献中只得到最低限度的解决。此外,对实施以幸存者为中心的实践和结合基于实践的知识的关注有限。这些发现强调了研究人员和实践者之间需要长期合作,明确地整合实施科学。这种伙伴关系有助于更有效地调整、扩大和维持以证据为基础的暴力侵害/C预防项目,同时确保这些项目始终以幸存者为中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is devoted to organizing, synthesizing, and expanding knowledge on all force of trauma, abuse, and violence. This peer-reviewed journal is practitioner oriented and will publish only reviews of research, conceptual or theoretical articles, and law review articles. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is dedicated to professionals and advanced students in clinical training who work with any form of trauma, abuse, and violence. It is intended to compile knowledge that clearly affects practice, policy, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信