Holding Up at 80: Feasibility and Safety of Elective Type IV Hiatal Hernia Repair in Octogenarians.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Jessica E Wahi, Fadi Alsayegh, Jacob Kalathoor, Fernando M Safdie
{"title":"Holding Up at 80: Feasibility and Safety of Elective Type IV Hiatal Hernia Repair in Octogenarians.","authors":"Jessica E Wahi, Fadi Alsayegh, Jacob Kalathoor, Fernando M Safdie","doi":"10.1089/lap.2025.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The aging population has led to an increase in the prevalence of symptomatic paraesophageal hernias (PEHs), particularly among octogenarians. While elective repair is associated with improved outcomes compared to emergency repair, there are limited data on the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted PEH repair in this high-risk population. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted a retrospective review of patients aged 65-89 who underwent robotic-assisted elective type IV PEH repair by a single surgeon at Mount Sinai Medical Center from 2020 to 2023. Patients were divided into two cohorts: octogenarians (80-89 years) and seniors (65-79 years). Demographics, perioperative outcomes, and complications were analyzed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 38 patients were included, with 15 octogenarians and 23 seniors. The mean ages were 84 ± 2 years and 73 ± 5 years, respectively. The majority of patients were female (73% octogenarians, 87% seniors), and the average body mass index was comparable between cohorts (25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> ± 3.7 versus 25 ± 4.7). The mean hospital length of stay was 2.7 ± 1.8 days for octogenarians and 2.4 ± 1.8 days for seniors (<i>P</i> = .6). No intraoperative complications or 30-day mortality occurred. Two octogenarians (13%) and three seniors (13%) were readmitted within 30 days. At 6 months, 87% of octogenarians and 69% of seniors reported resolution of preoperative symptoms (<i>P</i> = .3). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Robotic-assisted repair of type IV PEHs is a safe and effective option for both octogenarians and seniors. The absence of intraoperative complications and 30-day mortality supports its feasibility in elderly patients, including those in their eighth decade of life. These findings advocate for elective minimally invasive repair in carefully selected patients, regardless of advanced age, and highlight the importance of further studies to validate long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"538-541"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2025.0017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aging population has led to an increase in the prevalence of symptomatic paraesophageal hernias (PEHs), particularly among octogenarians. While elective repair is associated with improved outcomes compared to emergency repair, there are limited data on the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted PEH repair in this high-risk population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients aged 65-89 who underwent robotic-assisted elective type IV PEH repair by a single surgeon at Mount Sinai Medical Center from 2020 to 2023. Patients were divided into two cohorts: octogenarians (80-89 years) and seniors (65-79 years). Demographics, perioperative outcomes, and complications were analyzed. Results: A total of 38 patients were included, with 15 octogenarians and 23 seniors. The mean ages were 84 ± 2 years and 73 ± 5 years, respectively. The majority of patients were female (73% octogenarians, 87% seniors), and the average body mass index was comparable between cohorts (25 kg/m2 ± 3.7 versus 25 ± 4.7). The mean hospital length of stay was 2.7 ± 1.8 days for octogenarians and 2.4 ± 1.8 days for seniors (P = .6). No intraoperative complications or 30-day mortality occurred. Two octogenarians (13%) and three seniors (13%) were readmitted within 30 days. At 6 months, 87% of octogenarians and 69% of seniors reported resolution of preoperative symptoms (P = .3). Conclusions: Robotic-assisted repair of type IV PEHs is a safe and effective option for both octogenarians and seniors. The absence of intraoperative complications and 30-day mortality supports its feasibility in elderly patients, including those in their eighth decade of life. These findings advocate for elective minimally invasive repair in carefully selected patients, regardless of advanced age, and highlight the importance of further studies to validate long-term outcomes.

80岁:80多岁老人选择性IV型裂孔疝修补术的可行性和安全性。
背景:人口老龄化导致症状性食管旁疝(PEHs)的患病率增加,特别是在80多岁的老年人中。虽然与紧急修复相比,选择性修复与改善的预后相关,但在这一高危人群中,机器人辅助的PEH修复的安全性和有效性数据有限。方法:我们对2020年至2023年在西奈山医疗中心接受机器人辅助选择性IV型PEH修复的65-89岁患者进行了回顾性研究。患者分为两组:80-89岁的老年患者和65-79岁的老年患者。分析人口统计学、围手术期结局和并发症。结果:共纳入38例患者,其中老年15例,老年23例。平均年龄分别为84±2岁和73±5岁。大多数患者为女性(73%为耄耋老人,87%为老年人),队列之间的平均体重指数(25 kg/m2±3.7 vs 25±4.7)具有可比性。80岁老人平均住院时间为2.7±1.8天,老年人平均住院时间为2.4±1.8天(P = 0.6)。无术中并发症和30天死亡率。2名80多岁老人(13%)和3名老年人(13%)在30天内再次入院。6个月时,87%的八旬老人和69%的老年人报告术前症状缓解(P = 0.3)。结论:机器人辅助修复IV型PEHs是一种安全有效的选择,适用于八十多岁和老年人。无术中并发症和30天死亡率支持其在老年患者(包括80岁以上的患者)中的可行性。这些研究结果提倡对精心挑选的患者进行选择性微创修复,无论年龄大小,并强调进一步研究以验证长期结果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信