Re-visioning intercultural relational empathy.

IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Quentin Eichbaum, Alan Bleakley
{"title":"Re-visioning intercultural relational empathy.","authors":"Quentin Eichbaum, Alan Bleakley","doi":"10.1007/s10459-025-10429-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have previously argued that empathy is a multidimensional, context-modulated attribute, and that the Western unidimensional 'one size fits all' approach to empathy is inadequate particularly in intercultural settings. We called for relational empathy characterized by qualities such as curiosity; cultural and epistemic humility; bidirectional engagement; relational consciousness/ubuntu. In a paradigm shift from dominant models of ego-based empathy as projected content, here we describe a model of empathies or multiple 'local stories' that are process-based, fluid and context-dependent. Such empathies are not 'given' but 'generated' as an emergent property of social engagement based on a dialectic of democracy. Establishing such Intercultural Relational Empathies demands a shift from singular 'content' empathy to multiple 'process' empathies produced through sensitive, democratic encounter. We thus distinguish between 'settled' empathy as an individual trait and 'nomadic' empathies as negotiation in social settings. While the former describes empathy as ego-based content, the latter describes empathy as process and eco-centric - specifically, an emergent property of a nonlinear, open, dynamic, complex system that is an active social collective. We focus on the collective of an intercultural healthcare setting common to contemporary global healthcare - multicultural healthcare teams treating a range of patients. We describe 'nomadic' empathies as produced through dialectic and negotiation, both collaborative and competitive. We suggest that the globally dominant modernist model of content-based, ego-driven empathy is grounded in the values systems of individualism common to high-income countries. This affords a 'grand narrative' or dominant value, but one size does not fit all.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-025-10429-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We have previously argued that empathy is a multidimensional, context-modulated attribute, and that the Western unidimensional 'one size fits all' approach to empathy is inadequate particularly in intercultural settings. We called for relational empathy characterized by qualities such as curiosity; cultural and epistemic humility; bidirectional engagement; relational consciousness/ubuntu. In a paradigm shift from dominant models of ego-based empathy as projected content, here we describe a model of empathies or multiple 'local stories' that are process-based, fluid and context-dependent. Such empathies are not 'given' but 'generated' as an emergent property of social engagement based on a dialectic of democracy. Establishing such Intercultural Relational Empathies demands a shift from singular 'content' empathy to multiple 'process' empathies produced through sensitive, democratic encounter. We thus distinguish between 'settled' empathy as an individual trait and 'nomadic' empathies as negotiation in social settings. While the former describes empathy as ego-based content, the latter describes empathy as process and eco-centric - specifically, an emergent property of a nonlinear, open, dynamic, complex system that is an active social collective. We focus on the collective of an intercultural healthcare setting common to contemporary global healthcare - multicultural healthcare teams treating a range of patients. We describe 'nomadic' empathies as produced through dialectic and negotiation, both collaborative and competitive. We suggest that the globally dominant modernist model of content-based, ego-driven empathy is grounded in the values systems of individualism common to high-income countries. This affords a 'grand narrative' or dominant value, but one size does not fit all.

重新审视跨文化关系共情。
我们之前认为,共情是一种多维的、受环境调节的属性,西方的单向度“一刀切”的共情方法是不充分的,特别是在跨文化环境中。我们呼吁以好奇心等品质为特征的关系共情;文化和认知上的谦逊;双向参与;关系意识/ ubuntu。在从以自我为基础的共情作为预测内容的主导模型的范式转变中,我们在这里描述了一个基于过程的、流动的和依赖于上下文的共情模型或多个“本地故事”。这种共情不是“给予的”,而是“产生的”,是基于民主辩证法的社会参与的一种新兴属性。建立这种跨文化关系共情需要从单一的“内容”共情转变为通过敏感、民主的遭遇产生的多重“过程”共情。因此,我们区分了作为个体特征的“定居”同理心和作为社会环境谈判的“游牧”同理心。前者将共情描述为以自我为基础的内容,后者将共情描述为过程和以生态为中心——具体来说,是一个非线性、开放、动态、复杂系统的新兴属性,是一个活跃的社会集体。我们专注于当代全球医疗保健共同的跨文化医疗保健环境-多元文化医疗保健团队治疗一系列患者。我们将“游牧”同理心描述为通过辩证和协商产生的同理心,包括合作和竞争。我们认为,在全球占主导地位的以内容为基础、以自我为导向的移情模式,是建立在高收入国家共同的个人主义价值体系基础之上的。这提供了一种“宏大叙事”或主导价值,但一种尺寸并不适合所有人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信