Control of lymphatic pacemaking and pumping by mechanobiological signals

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
M. J. Davis, C. D. Bertram
{"title":"Control of lymphatic pacemaking and pumping by mechanobiological signals","authors":"M. J. Davis,&nbsp;C. D. Bertram","doi":"10.1113/JP288477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n \n <div>The spontaneous, phasic contractions of collecting lymphatic vessels are critical for lymph transport and interstitial fluid homeostasis. Phasic contractions are initiated by action potentials in lymphatic muscle and conduct along the vessel to trigger contraction waves. Contractions are regulated by pressure and shear stress (SS), but only limited aspects of that regulation are understood. Numerical models predict that pressure promotes retrograde propagation of contraction waves, whereas nitric oxide (NO) production associated with phasic contractions (pulsatile NO) promotes antegrade conduction and extends the pressure range over which contractions propel lymph. These predictions were tested using 3−4-valve segments of rat mesenteric lymphatic vessels using pressure myography and protocols that imposed forward flow, elevated inflow pressure (<i>P</i><sub>in</sub>) or elevated outflow pressure (<i>P</i><sub>out</sub>), each with/without intact NO signalling. NO bioavailability and flow-induced responses were enhanced by <span>l</span>-arginine supplementation. Spatiotemporal maps generated from video images were used to quantify the direction and extent of contraction wave conduction. Our results show that (1) contraction waves are normally biased towards retrograde conduction at equal <i>P</i><sub>in</sub>/<i>P</i><sub>out</sub> levels. (2) <i>P</i><sub>in</sub> elevation promotes antegrade conduction, whereas <i>P</i><sub>out</sub> elevation promotes retrograde conduction. (3) Imposed flow is inhibitory, reducing contraction amplitude and frequency and limiting the extent of contraction wave conduction without a significant effect on conduction direction. (4) Pulsatile NO does not significantly influence the conduction direction or extend the pressure range over which spontaneous contractions occur. Our findings support the idea that pressure is the dominant regulator of lymphatic pacemaking and pumping, with pulsatile NO having only minimal influence.\n\n <figure>\n <div><picture>\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\n </div>\n </figure>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Key points</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>The degree to which spontaneous, phasic contractions of lymphatic collecting vessels are regulated by pressure and shear stress is not fully understood.</li>\n \n <li>Numeric models predict that nitric oxide (NO) production associated with phasic contractions (pulsatile NO) promotes antegrade conduction of contraction waves, whereas pressure elevation promotes retrograde conduction; pulsatile NO production is also thought to extend the pressure range over which phasic contractions occur.</li>\n \n <li><i>Ex vivo</i> methods were used to control pressure/flow in 3−4 valve segments of collecting lymphatics from rat mesentery, with preserved or inhibited NO signalling.</li>\n \n <li>The relatively long vessel segments limited the absolute levels of imposed flow/SS, so <span>l</span>-arginine supplementation was used to enhance NO bioavailability.</li>\n \n <li>Our findings support a scheme whereby pressure is by far the dominant mechanism determining the pacemaking site of lymphatic collectors, and challenge existing dogma about the importance of pulsatile NO production in regulating their behaviour.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":"603 11","pages":"3307-3327"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1113/JP288477","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP288477","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The spontaneous, phasic contractions of collecting lymphatic vessels are critical for lymph transport and interstitial fluid homeostasis. Phasic contractions are initiated by action potentials in lymphatic muscle and conduct along the vessel to trigger contraction waves. Contractions are regulated by pressure and shear stress (SS), but only limited aspects of that regulation are understood. Numerical models predict that pressure promotes retrograde propagation of contraction waves, whereas nitric oxide (NO) production associated with phasic contractions (pulsatile NO) promotes antegrade conduction and extends the pressure range over which contractions propel lymph. These predictions were tested using 3−4-valve segments of rat mesenteric lymphatic vessels using pressure myography and protocols that imposed forward flow, elevated inflow pressure (Pin) or elevated outflow pressure (Pout), each with/without intact NO signalling. NO bioavailability and flow-induced responses were enhanced by l-arginine supplementation. Spatiotemporal maps generated from video images were used to quantify the direction and extent of contraction wave conduction. Our results show that (1) contraction waves are normally biased towards retrograde conduction at equal Pin/Pout levels. (2) Pin elevation promotes antegrade conduction, whereas Pout elevation promotes retrograde conduction. (3) Imposed flow is inhibitory, reducing contraction amplitude and frequency and limiting the extent of contraction wave conduction without a significant effect on conduction direction. (4) Pulsatile NO does not significantly influence the conduction direction or extend the pressure range over which spontaneous contractions occur. Our findings support the idea that pressure is the dominant regulator of lymphatic pacemaking and pumping, with pulsatile NO having only minimal influence.

Key points

  • The degree to which spontaneous, phasic contractions of lymphatic collecting vessels are regulated by pressure and shear stress is not fully understood.
  • Numeric models predict that nitric oxide (NO) production associated with phasic contractions (pulsatile NO) promotes antegrade conduction of contraction waves, whereas pressure elevation promotes retrograde conduction; pulsatile NO production is also thought to extend the pressure range over which phasic contractions occur.
  • Ex vivo methods were used to control pressure/flow in 3−4 valve segments of collecting lymphatics from rat mesentery, with preserved or inhibited NO signalling.
  • The relatively long vessel segments limited the absolute levels of imposed flow/SS, so l-arginine supplementation was used to enhance NO bioavailability.
  • Our findings support a scheme whereby pressure is by far the dominant mechanism determining the pacemaking site of lymphatic collectors, and challenge existing dogma about the importance of pulsatile NO production in regulating their behaviour.
机械生物学信号对淋巴起搏和泵送的控制。
收集淋巴管的自发、阶段性收缩对淋巴运输和间质液的稳态至关重要。阶段性收缩是由淋巴肌的动作电位引起的,并沿血管传导以触发收缩波。收缩是由压力和剪切应力(SS)调节的,但仅了解该调节的有限方面。数值模型预测,压力促进收缩波的逆行传播,而与阶段性收缩(脉动性NO)相关的一氧化氮(NO)的产生促进顺行传导,并扩大收缩推动淋巴的压力范围。这些预测是用3-4瓣大鼠肠系膜淋巴管段进行测试的,使用压力肌图和施加前流、升高的流入压力(Pin)或升高的流出压力(Pout),每一个都有/没有完整的NO信号。补充l-精氨酸可提高NO的生物利用度和血流诱导反应。利用视频图像生成的时空图来量化收缩波传导的方向和程度。我们的研究结果表明:(1)在相等的Pin/Pout水平下,收缩波通常偏向逆行传导。(2) Pin抬高促进顺行传导,而Pout抬高促进逆行传导。(3)施加流具有抑制作用,降低收缩幅度和频率,限制收缩波传导的程度,但对传导方向无显著影响。(4)脉动NO对传导方向没有明显影响,也没有扩大自发收缩发生的压力范围。我们的研究结果支持了这样一种观点,即压力是淋巴起搏和泵送的主要调节因素,而脉动性一氧化氮的影响很小。重点:淋巴收集血管的自发性、阶段性收缩受压力和剪切应力调节的程度尚不完全清楚。数值模型预测,与相位收缩(脉动性NO)相关的一氧化氮(NO)的产生促进收缩波的顺行传导,而压力升高促进逆行传导;脉动NO的产生也被认为扩大了发生相位收缩的压力范围。采用体外方法控制大鼠肠系膜收集淋巴3-4个阀段的压力/流量,保留或抑制NO信号。相对较长的血管段限制了施加流量/SS的绝对水平,因此补充l-精氨酸可以提高NO的生物利用度。我们的研究结果支持了一种方案,即压力是迄今为止决定淋巴收集器起搏部位的主要机制,并挑战了关于脉动NO产生在调节其行为中的重要性的现有教条。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Physiology-London
Journal of Physiology-London 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew. The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信