{"title":"Control of lymphatic pacemaking and pumping by mechanobiological signals","authors":"M. J. Davis, C. D. Bertram","doi":"10.1113/JP288477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n \n <div>The spontaneous, phasic contractions of collecting lymphatic vessels are critical for lymph transport and interstitial fluid homeostasis. Phasic contractions are initiated by action potentials in lymphatic muscle and conduct along the vessel to trigger contraction waves. Contractions are regulated by pressure and shear stress (SS), but only limited aspects of that regulation are understood. Numerical models predict that pressure promotes retrograde propagation of contraction waves, whereas nitric oxide (NO) production associated with phasic contractions (pulsatile NO) promotes antegrade conduction and extends the pressure range over which contractions propel lymph. These predictions were tested using 3−4-valve segments of rat mesenteric lymphatic vessels using pressure myography and protocols that imposed forward flow, elevated inflow pressure (<i>P</i><sub>in</sub>) or elevated outflow pressure (<i>P</i><sub>out</sub>), each with/without intact NO signalling. NO bioavailability and flow-induced responses were enhanced by <span>l</span>-arginine supplementation. Spatiotemporal maps generated from video images were used to quantify the direction and extent of contraction wave conduction. Our results show that (1) contraction waves are normally biased towards retrograde conduction at equal <i>P</i><sub>in</sub>/<i>P</i><sub>out</sub> levels. (2) <i>P</i><sub>in</sub> elevation promotes antegrade conduction, whereas <i>P</i><sub>out</sub> elevation promotes retrograde conduction. (3) Imposed flow is inhibitory, reducing contraction amplitude and frequency and limiting the extent of contraction wave conduction without a significant effect on conduction direction. (4) Pulsatile NO does not significantly influence the conduction direction or extend the pressure range over which spontaneous contractions occur. Our findings support the idea that pressure is the dominant regulator of lymphatic pacemaking and pumping, with pulsatile NO having only minimal influence.\n\n <figure>\n <div><picture>\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\n </div>\n </figure>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Key points</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>The degree to which spontaneous, phasic contractions of lymphatic collecting vessels are regulated by pressure and shear stress is not fully understood.</li>\n \n <li>Numeric models predict that nitric oxide (NO) production associated with phasic contractions (pulsatile NO) promotes antegrade conduction of contraction waves, whereas pressure elevation promotes retrograde conduction; pulsatile NO production is also thought to extend the pressure range over which phasic contractions occur.</li>\n \n <li><i>Ex vivo</i> methods were used to control pressure/flow in 3−4 valve segments of collecting lymphatics from rat mesentery, with preserved or inhibited NO signalling.</li>\n \n <li>The relatively long vessel segments limited the absolute levels of imposed flow/SS, so <span>l</span>-arginine supplementation was used to enhance NO bioavailability.</li>\n \n <li>Our findings support a scheme whereby pressure is by far the dominant mechanism determining the pacemaking site of lymphatic collectors, and challenge existing dogma about the importance of pulsatile NO production in regulating their behaviour.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":"603 11","pages":"3307-3327"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1113/JP288477","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP288477","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The spontaneous, phasic contractions of collecting lymphatic vessels are critical for lymph transport and interstitial fluid homeostasis. Phasic contractions are initiated by action potentials in lymphatic muscle and conduct along the vessel to trigger contraction waves. Contractions are regulated by pressure and shear stress (SS), but only limited aspects of that regulation are understood. Numerical models predict that pressure promotes retrograde propagation of contraction waves, whereas nitric oxide (NO) production associated with phasic contractions (pulsatile NO) promotes antegrade conduction and extends the pressure range over which contractions propel lymph. These predictions were tested using 3−4-valve segments of rat mesenteric lymphatic vessels using pressure myography and protocols that imposed forward flow, elevated inflow pressure (Pin) or elevated outflow pressure (Pout), each with/without intact NO signalling. NO bioavailability and flow-induced responses were enhanced by l-arginine supplementation. Spatiotemporal maps generated from video images were used to quantify the direction and extent of contraction wave conduction. Our results show that (1) contraction waves are normally biased towards retrograde conduction at equal Pin/Pout levels. (2) Pin elevation promotes antegrade conduction, whereas Pout elevation promotes retrograde conduction. (3) Imposed flow is inhibitory, reducing contraction amplitude and frequency and limiting the extent of contraction wave conduction without a significant effect on conduction direction. (4) Pulsatile NO does not significantly influence the conduction direction or extend the pressure range over which spontaneous contractions occur. Our findings support the idea that pressure is the dominant regulator of lymphatic pacemaking and pumping, with pulsatile NO having only minimal influence.
Key points
The degree to which spontaneous, phasic contractions of lymphatic collecting vessels are regulated by pressure and shear stress is not fully understood.
Numeric models predict that nitric oxide (NO) production associated with phasic contractions (pulsatile NO) promotes antegrade conduction of contraction waves, whereas pressure elevation promotes retrograde conduction; pulsatile NO production is also thought to extend the pressure range over which phasic contractions occur.
Ex vivo methods were used to control pressure/flow in 3−4 valve segments of collecting lymphatics from rat mesentery, with preserved or inhibited NO signalling.
The relatively long vessel segments limited the absolute levels of imposed flow/SS, so l-arginine supplementation was used to enhance NO bioavailability.
Our findings support a scheme whereby pressure is by far the dominant mechanism determining the pacemaking site of lymphatic collectors, and challenge existing dogma about the importance of pulsatile NO production in regulating their behaviour.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew.
The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.