Inequality in Utilization of Maternal Healthcare Services in Low‑ and Middle‑Income Countries: A Scoping Review of the Literature.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Maternal and Child Health Journal Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-03 DOI:10.1007/s10995-025-04111-9
Farjana Misu, Dominic Gasbarro, Khurshid Alam
{"title":"Inequality in Utilization of Maternal Healthcare Services in Low‑ and Middle‑Income Countries: A Scoping Review of the Literature.","authors":"Farjana Misu, Dominic Gasbarro, Khurshid Alam","doi":"10.1007/s10995-025-04111-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inequality in maternal healthcare service (MHS) utilization is a significant global health challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Recently, the literature on MHS inequality in LMICs has expanded. We conducted a scoping review to synthesize existing evidence and identify knowledge gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL Ultimate in June 2023 for literature published since January 1, 2015. We included empirical studies using nationally representative data to measure inequality in at least one of five MHS indicators: antenatal care (ANC), skilled birth attendance (SBA), facility-based delivery (FBD), caesarean-section (C-section) delivery, and postnatal care (PNC). Our review encompassed 132 peer-reviewed articles on MHS inequality in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ANC, FBD, and SBA were more frequently analyzed indicators for inequality measurement compared to PNC and C-section delivery. None of the 132 studies assessed all five MHS indicators together. The concentration index was the most frequently used inequality measure across all MHS indicators. Included studies were predominantly focused on economic (wealth) and geographic (residence, region) inequalities, while sociocultural factors (e.g., religion, ethnicity) remain underexplored. Inequality was most pronounced in low-income (LICs) and lower-middle-income countries (LwMICs). The extant literature mainly concentrates on India and Ethiopia as research settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our review highlights significant gaps in health inequality research, particularly in LICs and upper-middle-income countries (UMICs), with a heavy reliance on cross-sectional data, limited assessment of PNC and C-section delivery and lack of comprehensive analysis across all five common MHS indicators. Future research in LMICs should address the gaps identified in this review.</p>","PeriodicalId":48367,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"741-766"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-025-04111-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inequality in maternal healthcare service (MHS) utilization is a significant global health challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Recently, the literature on MHS inequality in LMICs has expanded. We conducted a scoping review to synthesize existing evidence and identify knowledge gaps.

Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL Ultimate in June 2023 for literature published since January 1, 2015. We included empirical studies using nationally representative data to measure inequality in at least one of five MHS indicators: antenatal care (ANC), skilled birth attendance (SBA), facility-based delivery (FBD), caesarean-section (C-section) delivery, and postnatal care (PNC). Our review encompassed 132 peer-reviewed articles on MHS inequality in LMICs.

Results: ANC, FBD, and SBA were more frequently analyzed indicators for inequality measurement compared to PNC and C-section delivery. None of the 132 studies assessed all five MHS indicators together. The concentration index was the most frequently used inequality measure across all MHS indicators. Included studies were predominantly focused on economic (wealth) and geographic (residence, region) inequalities, while sociocultural factors (e.g., religion, ethnicity) remain underexplored. Inequality was most pronounced in low-income (LICs) and lower-middle-income countries (LwMICs). The extant literature mainly concentrates on India and Ethiopia as research settings.

Conclusion: Our review highlights significant gaps in health inequality research, particularly in LICs and upper-middle-income countries (UMICs), with a heavy reliance on cross-sectional data, limited assessment of PNC and C-section delivery and lack of comprehensive analysis across all five common MHS indicators. Future research in LMICs should address the gaps identified in this review.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

低收入和中等收入国家孕产妇保健服务利用的不平等:文献综述。
背景:孕产妇保健服务(MHS)利用的不平等是低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)面临的重大全球健康挑战。最近,关于中低收入国家MHS不平等的文献有所增加。我们进行了范围综述,以综合现有证据并确定知识差距。方法:根据PRISMA-ScR指南,我们于2023年6月系统检索PubMed、Scopus和CINAHL Ultimate,检索2015年1月1日以来发表的文献。我们纳入了使用全国代表性数据的实证研究,以衡量五个MHS指标中至少一个指标的不平等:产前护理(ANC)、熟练助产(SBA)、医院分娩(FBD)、剖腹产(C-section)分娩和产后护理(PNC)。我们的综述包含了132篇关于中低收入国家MHS不平等的同行评议文章。结果:与PNC和剖腹产分娩相比,ANC、FBD和SBA是更频繁分析的不平等测量指标。这132项研究中没有一项综合评估了所有5项卫生保健指标。在所有MHS指标中,浓度指数是最常用的不平等衡量标准。纳入的研究主要集中在经济(财富)和地理(居住、地区)不平等上,而社会文化因素(如宗教、种族)仍未得到充分探讨。不平等现象在低收入国家和中低收入国家最为明显。现存文献主要集中在印度和埃塞俄比亚作为研究背景。结论:我们的回顾突出了健康不平等研究的显著差距,特别是在低收入国家和中高收入国家(UMICs),严重依赖横断面数据,对PNC和剖腹产分娩的评估有限,缺乏对所有五个常见MHS指标的全面分析。未来对中低收入国家的研究应解决本综述中确定的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Maternal and Child Health Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
271
期刊介绍: Maternal and Child Health Journal is the first exclusive forum to advance the scientific and professional knowledge base of the maternal and child health (MCH) field. This bimonthly provides peer-reviewed papers addressing the following areas of MCH practice, policy, and research: MCH epidemiology, demography, and health status assessment Innovative MCH service initiatives Implementation of MCH programs MCH policy analysis and advocacy MCH professional development. Exploring the full spectrum of the MCH field, Maternal and Child Health Journal is an important tool for practitioners as well as academics in public health, obstetrics, gynecology, prenatal medicine, pediatrics, and neonatology. Sponsors include the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP), the Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health (ATMCH), and CityMatCH.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信