Artificial intelligence in prenatal diagnosis: Down syndrome risk assessment with the power of gradient boosting-based machine learning algorithms.

IF 1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Emre Yalçın, Tarık Kaan Koç, Serpil Aslan, Süleyman Cansun Demir, İsmail Cüneyt Evrüke, Mete Sucu, Mesut Avan, Fatma İşlek Uzay
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in prenatal diagnosis: Down syndrome risk assessment with the power of gradient boosting-based machine learning algorithms.","authors":"Emre Yalçın, Tarık Kaan Koç, Serpil Aslan, Süleyman Cansun Demir, İsmail Cüneyt Evrüke, Mete Sucu, Mesut Avan, Fatma İşlek Uzay","doi":"10.4274/tjod.galenos.2025.83278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>One of the most common chromosomal abnormalities seen during pregnancy is Down syndrome (Trisomy 21). To determine the risk of Down syndrome, first-trimester combined screening tests are essential. Using data from the first-trimester screening test, this study compares machine learning and deep learning models to forecast the risk of Down syndrome.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Within the scope of the study, biochemical and biophysical data of 959 pregnant women who underwent first-trimester screening tests at Çukurova University Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic between 2020-2024 were analyzed. After cleaning missing and erroneous data, various preprocessing and normalization techniques were applied to the final dataset consisting of 853 observations. Down syndrome risk prediction was performed using different machine learning models, and model performances were compared based on accuracy rates and other evaluation metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Experimental results show that the CatBoost model provides the highest success rate, with an accuracy rate of 95.31%. In addition, the XGBoost and LightGBM models exhibited high performance, with accuracy rates of 95.19% and 94.84%, respectively. The study also examines the effects of the class imbalance problem on model performance in detail and evaluates various strategies to reduce this imbalance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings show that gradient boosting-based machine learning models have significant potential in Down syndrome risk prediction. This approach is expected to contribute to the reduction of unnecessary invasive tests and improve clinical decision-making processes by increasing the accuracy rate in prenatal screening processes. Future studies should aim to increase the generalization capacity of the model on larger data sets and to provide integration with different machine learning algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":45340,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"22 2","pages":"121-128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12136125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2025.83278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: One of the most common chromosomal abnormalities seen during pregnancy is Down syndrome (Trisomy 21). To determine the risk of Down syndrome, first-trimester combined screening tests are essential. Using data from the first-trimester screening test, this study compares machine learning and deep learning models to forecast the risk of Down syndrome.

Materials and methods: Within the scope of the study, biochemical and biophysical data of 959 pregnant women who underwent first-trimester screening tests at Çukurova University Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic between 2020-2024 were analyzed. After cleaning missing and erroneous data, various preprocessing and normalization techniques were applied to the final dataset consisting of 853 observations. Down syndrome risk prediction was performed using different machine learning models, and model performances were compared based on accuracy rates and other evaluation metrics.

Results: Experimental results show that the CatBoost model provides the highest success rate, with an accuracy rate of 95.31%. In addition, the XGBoost and LightGBM models exhibited high performance, with accuracy rates of 95.19% and 94.84%, respectively. The study also examines the effects of the class imbalance problem on model performance in detail and evaluates various strategies to reduce this imbalance.

Conclusion: The findings show that gradient boosting-based machine learning models have significant potential in Down syndrome risk prediction. This approach is expected to contribute to the reduction of unnecessary invasive tests and improve clinical decision-making processes by increasing the accuracy rate in prenatal screening processes. Future studies should aim to increase the generalization capacity of the model on larger data sets and to provide integration with different machine learning algorithms.

产前诊断中的人工智能:基于梯度增强的机器学习算法的唐氏综合症风险评估。
目的:怀孕期间最常见的染色体异常之一是唐氏综合症(21三体)。为了确定唐氏综合症的风险,妊娠早期的联合筛查测试是必不可少的。利用妊娠早期筛查测试的数据,本研究比较了机器学习和深度学习模型来预测唐氏综合症的风险。材料与方法:在研究范围内,对2020-2024年期间在Çukurova大学妇产科门诊接受妊娠早期筛查的959名孕妇的生化和生物物理数据进行分析。在清除缺失和错误数据后,对由853个观测值组成的最终数据集应用各种预处理和归一化技术。使用不同的机器学习模型进行唐氏综合征风险预测,并根据准确率和其他评估指标比较模型的性能。结果:实验结果表明,CatBoost模型的准确率最高,达到95.31%。此外,XGBoost和LightGBM模型表现出较高的性能,准确率分别为95.19%和94.84%。本研究还详细考察了类失衡问题对模型性能的影响,并评估了减少这种失衡的各种策略。结论:研究结果表明,基于梯度增强的机器学习模型在唐氏综合征风险预测中具有重要的潜力。这种方法预计将有助于减少不必要的侵入性检查,并通过提高产前筛查过程的准确率来改善临床决策过程。未来的研究应旨在提高模型在更大数据集上的泛化能力,并提供与不同机器学习算法的集成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信