Efficacy of Budesonide Nasal Irrigation in Comparison to Normal Saline Irrigation in Post-Operative Management of Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

Q4 Medicine
Kathmandu University Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01
B L Shrestha, D Sijapati, A Dhakal
{"title":"Efficacy of Budesonide Nasal Irrigation in Comparison to Normal Saline Irrigation in Post-Operative Management of Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.","authors":"B L Shrestha, D Sijapati, A Dhakal","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Nasal irrigation with normal saline and topical steroid spray forms the mainstay of treatment in post endoscopic sinus surgery patients. However nasal sprays may not deliver optimum dosage of drug to the paranasal sinus mucosa. Budesonide nasal irrigation solves this problem by delivering drugs in a high-volume high-pressure system. Objective The main objectiveof this study will provide insight into the efficacy of budesonide nasal irrigation following functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) surgery and will help to establish new protocols in future. Method Forty-four patients were included and divided into 2 groups of 22 each. One arm received normal saline nasal irrigation and the other arm received budesonide nasal irrigation (1 mg in 500 ml) twice daily. Patients were followed up at 1st post-operative week and 10th post-operative week and on each visit Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT) 22 and Lund Kennedy Endoscopic scores (LKES) were assessed. Result The mean scores in the first visit was SNOT 22 : 15.73 + 8.897 vs 12.73 + 16.110 (p < 0.05) and LKES : 2.82 + 1.097 vs 1.77 + 1.52 (p > 0.05) in the saline and budesonide groups respectively. The mean scores in the second visit was SNOT 22 : 7.09+3.87 vs 3.73 + 8.70 (p < 0.05) and LKES : 1.64 + 0.790 vs 0.18 + 0.501 (p < 0.05) in the saline and budesonide groups respectively. Thus the budesonide arm had statistically significantly better scores when compared to the normal saline group. Conclusion Budesonide nasal irrigation with a positive pressure high volume device was found to have better efficacy when compared to normal saline irrigation. Budesonide nasal irrigation may be used in the post-operative management of endoscopic sinus surgery patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":35493,"journal":{"name":"Kathmandu University Medical Journal","volume":"22 88","pages":"20-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kathmandu University Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Nasal irrigation with normal saline and topical steroid spray forms the mainstay of treatment in post endoscopic sinus surgery patients. However nasal sprays may not deliver optimum dosage of drug to the paranasal sinus mucosa. Budesonide nasal irrigation solves this problem by delivering drugs in a high-volume high-pressure system. Objective The main objectiveof this study will provide insight into the efficacy of budesonide nasal irrigation following functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) surgery and will help to establish new protocols in future. Method Forty-four patients were included and divided into 2 groups of 22 each. One arm received normal saline nasal irrigation and the other arm received budesonide nasal irrigation (1 mg in 500 ml) twice daily. Patients were followed up at 1st post-operative week and 10th post-operative week and on each visit Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT) 22 and Lund Kennedy Endoscopic scores (LKES) were assessed. Result The mean scores in the first visit was SNOT 22 : 15.73 + 8.897 vs 12.73 + 16.110 (p < 0.05) and LKES : 2.82 + 1.097 vs 1.77 + 1.52 (p > 0.05) in the saline and budesonide groups respectively. The mean scores in the second visit was SNOT 22 : 7.09+3.87 vs 3.73 + 8.70 (p < 0.05) and LKES : 1.64 + 0.790 vs 0.18 + 0.501 (p < 0.05) in the saline and budesonide groups respectively. Thus the budesonide arm had statistically significantly better scores when compared to the normal saline group. Conclusion Budesonide nasal irrigation with a positive pressure high volume device was found to have better efficacy when compared to normal saline irrigation. Budesonide nasal irrigation may be used in the post-operative management of endoscopic sinus surgery patients.

布地奈德鼻冲洗与生理盐水冲洗在功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术后处理中的效果比较。
背景:生理盐水和外用类固醇喷雾鼻腔冲洗是鼻内窥镜手术后患者的主要治疗方法。然而,鼻腔喷雾剂可能无法将最佳剂量的药物输送到鼻窦粘膜。布地奈德鼻腔冲洗通过在大容量高压系统中输送药物解决了这个问题。目的本研究的主要目的是了解功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)后布地奈德鼻冲洗的疗效,并有助于建立新的治疗方案。方法将44例患者分为2组,每组22例。一只手臂接受生理盐水鼻腔冲洗,另一只手臂接受布地奈德鼻腔冲洗(1 mg / 500ml),每日2次。患者于术后第1周和第10周随访,每次就诊时评估鼻内镜预后测试(SNOT) 22分和Lund Kennedy内镜评分(LKES)。结果生理盐水组和布地奈德组首次就诊时平均SNOT评分分别为15.73 + 8.897和12.73 + 16.110 (p < 0.05), LKES评分分别为2.82 + 1.097和1.77 + 1.52 (p < 0.05)。生理盐水组和布地奈德组第二次就诊时的平均评分分别为SNOT 22: 7.09+3.87 vs 3.73 + 8.70 (p < 0.05), LKES: 1.64 + 0.790 vs 0.18 + 0.501 (p < 0.05)。因此,与生理盐水组相比,布地奈德组有统计学上显著更好的评分。结论布地奈德高容积正压灌鼻比生理盐水灌鼻效果好。布地奈德鼻冲洗可用于内镜鼻窦手术患者的术后管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kathmandu University Medical Journal
Kathmandu University Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信