Katharina Boy, Niklas Ohm, Susann May, Greta Nordmann, Lynn Wilson, Johannes Knitza, Martin Heinze, Latika Gupta, Felix Muehlensiepen
{"title":"Social media in myositis care - an exploratory mixed-methods study among myositis patients (SociMyo).","authors":"Katharina Boy, Niklas Ohm, Susann May, Greta Nordmann, Lynn Wilson, Johannes Knitza, Martin Heinze, Latika Gupta, Felix Muehlensiepen","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05903-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Myositis is a rare autoimmune disease primarily affecting muscles, with potential involvement of the skin, heart, and lungs. Patients often experience delays in diagnosis, lack of adequate information, and limited support for disease management. Social media has emerged as a valuable tool to address these gaps by facilitating information exchange, peer support, and community building. However, its role in myositis care is not yet well understood. This study aims to explore how myositis patients use social media, focusing on shared content, perceived benefits and challenges, and the overall impact on disease management and emotional well-being. A mixed-methods approach was applied, including semi-structured interviews with 11 patients and a netnographic analysis of social media group dedicated to myositis care. Data were analyzed using Kuckartz's structured qualitative content analysis, with coding performed inductively, to identify key themes. Four key themes emerged: (I) Social media as a global platform for sharing experiential knowledge, particularly on symptom management, medication side effects, and coping strategies. (II) Peer support fostering a sense of belonging, emotional exchange, and mutual encouragement through structured discussions and community-driven moderation. (III) Perceived benefits, such as real-time access to patient-driven insights, shared decision-making support, and enhanced communication with healthcare providers. (IV) Perceived drawbacks, including misinformation, privacy concerns, and the absence of professional medical input. Participants emphasized the need for expert involvement to improve content reliability, while also valuing the autonomy and emotional support within these communities. Social media platforms, particularly closed groups, provide a complementary avenue to traditional care by offering support and knowledge exchange. To maximize their potential, privacy concerns and the integration of professional guidance must be addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 6","pages":"149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12137372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05903-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Myositis is a rare autoimmune disease primarily affecting muscles, with potential involvement of the skin, heart, and lungs. Patients often experience delays in diagnosis, lack of adequate information, and limited support for disease management. Social media has emerged as a valuable tool to address these gaps by facilitating information exchange, peer support, and community building. However, its role in myositis care is not yet well understood. This study aims to explore how myositis patients use social media, focusing on shared content, perceived benefits and challenges, and the overall impact on disease management and emotional well-being. A mixed-methods approach was applied, including semi-structured interviews with 11 patients and a netnographic analysis of social media group dedicated to myositis care. Data were analyzed using Kuckartz's structured qualitative content analysis, with coding performed inductively, to identify key themes. Four key themes emerged: (I) Social media as a global platform for sharing experiential knowledge, particularly on symptom management, medication side effects, and coping strategies. (II) Peer support fostering a sense of belonging, emotional exchange, and mutual encouragement through structured discussions and community-driven moderation. (III) Perceived benefits, such as real-time access to patient-driven insights, shared decision-making support, and enhanced communication with healthcare providers. (IV) Perceived drawbacks, including misinformation, privacy concerns, and the absence of professional medical input. Participants emphasized the need for expert involvement to improve content reliability, while also valuing the autonomy and emotional support within these communities. Social media platforms, particularly closed groups, provide a complementary avenue to traditional care by offering support and knowledge exchange. To maximize their potential, privacy concerns and the integration of professional guidance must be addressed.
期刊介绍:
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology.
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.