Potentials and barriers of digital patient education in rheumatic disease management: an exploratory qualitative interview study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Franziska Lumma, Johannes Knitza, Felix Mühlensiepen
{"title":"Potentials and barriers of digital patient education in rheumatic disease management: an exploratory qualitative interview study.","authors":"Franziska Lumma, Johannes Knitza, Felix Mühlensiepen","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05893-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient education (PE) is essential, however hindered by the limited time of rheumatology healthcare professionals. Digital patient education (DPE) promises to bridge this care gap. This study explores the potential and challenges of DPE in rheumatology. Semi-structured expert interviews were conducted with 14 stakeholders across healthcare levels, including rheumatologists, specialized nurses, patient representatives, policymakers, and industry experts. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis following Kuckartz's methodology, with intracoder reliability assessed via the Brennan-Prediger Kappa coefficient. Three main themes emerged in the qualitative content analysis: (1) the status quo of PE in general, (2) the potentials and challenges of DPE and (3) DiRhIS as an emerging tool in the field of DPE in rheumatology. Participants highlighted significant gaps in traditional PE, including limited consultation time, inadequate access to information, and misinformation risks. While DPE was recognized as a promising tool to enhance patient knowledge, adherence, and shared decision-making, systemic barriers hinder adoption. Experts identified key obstacles such as resistance among healthcare providers, limited digital literacy among patients, and challenges in integrating DPE into clinical workflows. A hybrid model combining digital and in-person education was favored to address patient needs across different literacy levels. Successful implementation requires structured integration, stakeholder involvement, and strategies to address infrastructural and attitudinal barriers. Digital patient education (DPE) has the potential to enhance accessibility and the quality of patient education in rheumatology. Findings emphasize the need for personalized patient education, where the balance between face-to-face and digital learning is adapted to individual preferences, health literacy levels, and accessibility needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 6","pages":"148"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12137533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05893-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient education (PE) is essential, however hindered by the limited time of rheumatology healthcare professionals. Digital patient education (DPE) promises to bridge this care gap. This study explores the potential and challenges of DPE in rheumatology. Semi-structured expert interviews were conducted with 14 stakeholders across healthcare levels, including rheumatologists, specialized nurses, patient representatives, policymakers, and industry experts. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis following Kuckartz's methodology, with intracoder reliability assessed via the Brennan-Prediger Kappa coefficient. Three main themes emerged in the qualitative content analysis: (1) the status quo of PE in general, (2) the potentials and challenges of DPE and (3) DiRhIS as an emerging tool in the field of DPE in rheumatology. Participants highlighted significant gaps in traditional PE, including limited consultation time, inadequate access to information, and misinformation risks. While DPE was recognized as a promising tool to enhance patient knowledge, adherence, and shared decision-making, systemic barriers hinder adoption. Experts identified key obstacles such as resistance among healthcare providers, limited digital literacy among patients, and challenges in integrating DPE into clinical workflows. A hybrid model combining digital and in-person education was favored to address patient needs across different literacy levels. Successful implementation requires structured integration, stakeholder involvement, and strategies to address infrastructural and attitudinal barriers. Digital patient education (DPE) has the potential to enhance accessibility and the quality of patient education in rheumatology. Findings emphasize the need for personalized patient education, where the balance between face-to-face and digital learning is adapted to individual preferences, health literacy levels, and accessibility needs.

风湿病管理中数字化患者教育的潜力和障碍:一项探索性质的访谈研究。
患者教育(PE)是必不可少的,但阻碍了风湿病医疗保健专业人员有限的时间。数字患者教育(DPE)有望弥合这一护理差距。本研究探讨了DPE在风湿病学中的潜力和挑战。半结构化的专家访谈进行了14个利益相关者在医疗保健水平,包括风湿病学家,专业护士,患者代表,政策制定者和行业专家。采用Kuckartz的方法对数据进行定性内容分析,并通过Brennan-Prediger Kappa系数评估内部可靠性。定性内容分析中出现了三个主要主题:(1)一般PE的现状;(2)DPE的潜力和挑战;(3)DiRhIS作为风湿病DPE领域的新兴工具。与会者强调了传统体育的重大差距,包括咨询时间有限、信息获取不足以及信息错误风险。虽然DPE被认为是提高患者知识、依从性和共同决策的有前途的工具,但系统性障碍阻碍了采用。专家们确定了主要障碍,如医疗保健提供者的抵制、患者的数字素养有限,以及将DPE整合到临床工作流程中的挑战。一种结合数字和面对面教育的混合模式被青睐,以满足不同文化水平的患者需求。成功的实施需要结构化的集成、涉众的参与,以及解决基础设施和态度障碍的策略。数字患者教育(DPE)有可能提高风湿病患者教育的可及性和质量。研究结果强调了个性化患者教育的必要性,即面对面学习和数字学习之间的平衡应适应个人偏好、健康素养水平和可及性需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheumatology International
Rheumatology International 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
191
审稿时长
16. months
期刊介绍: RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信