Validation of NOVA 27 Ultra-Processed Food Screener: adaptation and performance in Ecuador.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Wilma B Freire, Betzabé Tello, Philippe Belmont Guerrón
{"title":"Validation of NOVA 27 Ultra-Processed Food Screener: adaptation and performance in Ecuador.","authors":"Wilma B Freire, Betzabé Tello, Philippe Belmont Guerrón","doi":"10.1017/S1368980025100475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to adapt and validate the NOVA 27 Ultra-Processed Food (UPF) Screener for use in Ecuador by identifying commonly consumed foods, classifying them using the NOVA system, and testing the screener's validity in an urban sample and a national food survey.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in two phases: screener validation with a convenience sample of 327 adults in Quito through an online questionnaire (2021), and assessment of its applicability using data from the 2012 Ecuadorian National Health and Nutrition Survey (ENSANUT-Ecu). The method, adapted from a similar study in Brazil, compared NOVA UPF scores to the 24 Hour-Recall (24-HR) Automated Multiple-Pass Method (AMPM), used as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study included Quito's urban population for validation and secondary data from ENSANUT-Ecu.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>327 adults aged 18 to 64 from Quito were included in the validation phase, and 3510 adults from the ENSANUT-Ecu dataset were analyzed in the secondary analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The screener adaptation identified 27 subgroups of commonly consumed UPFs, summarizing 90% of UPF caloric intake. Validation results indicated significant agreement between the NOVA-UPF score and UPF intake, with PABAK indices above 0·8 for most socio-demographic groups. Higher NOVA-UPF scores corresponded to increased UPF dietary shares, mirroring patterns observed in the ENSANUT-Ecu dataset.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The adapted NOVA 27 UPFs Screener is a valid tool for assessing UPF intake in Ecuador, offering a practical resource for future dietary surveys to monitor and address UPF intake among Ecuadorian adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980025100475","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to adapt and validate the NOVA 27 Ultra-Processed Food (UPF) Screener for use in Ecuador by identifying commonly consumed foods, classifying them using the NOVA system, and testing the screener's validity in an urban sample and a national food survey.

Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted in two phases: screener validation with a convenience sample of 327 adults in Quito through an online questionnaire (2021), and assessment of its applicability using data from the 2012 Ecuadorian National Health and Nutrition Survey (ENSANUT-Ecu). The method, adapted from a similar study in Brazil, compared NOVA UPF scores to the 24 Hour-Recall (24-HR) Automated Multiple-Pass Method (AMPM), used as the gold standard.

Setting: The study included Quito's urban population for validation and secondary data from ENSANUT-Ecu.

Participants: 327 adults aged 18 to 64 from Quito were included in the validation phase, and 3510 adults from the ENSANUT-Ecu dataset were analyzed in the secondary analysis.

Results: The screener adaptation identified 27 subgroups of commonly consumed UPFs, summarizing 90% of UPF caloric intake. Validation results indicated significant agreement between the NOVA-UPF score and UPF intake, with PABAK indices above 0·8 for most socio-demographic groups. Higher NOVA-UPF scores corresponded to increased UPF dietary shares, mirroring patterns observed in the ENSANUT-Ecu dataset.

Conclusions: The adapted NOVA 27 UPFs Screener is a valid tool for assessing UPF intake in Ecuador, offering a practical resource for future dietary surveys to monitor and address UPF intake among Ecuadorian adults.

NOVA 27超加工食品筛选器的验证:在厄瓜多尔的适应和性能。
目的:本研究旨在通过识别常见消费食品,使用NOVA系统对其进行分类,并在城市样本和国家食品调查中测试筛选器的有效性,从而适应和验证NOVA 27超加工食品(UPF)筛选器在厄瓜多尔的使用。设计:横断面研究分两个阶段进行:通过在线问卷(2021年)对基多327名成年人的方便样本进行筛选验证,并使用2012年厄瓜多尔国家健康和营养调查(ENSANUT-Ecu)的数据评估其适用性。该方法改编自巴西的一项类似研究,将NOVA UPF分数与24小时回忆(24- hr)自动多次通过法(AMPM)进行比较,后者被用作金标准。环境:该研究包括基多的城市人口进行验证和来自ENSANUT-Ecu的次要数据。参与者:验证阶段包括来自基多的327名18至64岁的成年人,并在二次分析中分析了来自ENSANUT-Ecu数据集的3510名成年人。结果:筛选适应确定了27个常用UPF亚组,总结了90%的UPF热量摄入。验证结果表明NOVA-UPF评分与UPF摄入量之间存在显著的一致性,大多数社会人口统计学群体的PABAK指数都在0.8以上。NOVA-UPF得分越高,UPF饮食份额越高,这与ENSANUT-Ecu数据集中观察到的模式一致。结论:改进后的NOVA 27 UPF筛选器是评估厄瓜多尔UPF摄入量的有效工具,为未来的饮食调查提供实用资源,以监测和解决厄瓜多尔成年人的UPF摄入量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Nutrition
Public Health Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
521
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信