Application of Case-Based Learning Combined with PDCA in the Training of Grassroot Surgeons for the Updates in the CSCO Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast (2023).

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-04 DOI:10.4103/njcp.njcp_161_24
J Li, G Hu, G Zhao
{"title":"Application of Case-Based Learning Combined with PDCA in the Training of Grassroot Surgeons for the Updates in the CSCO Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast (2023).","authors":"J Li, G Hu, G Zhao","doi":"10.4103/njcp.njcp_161_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In county-level hospitals in China, there is a need to enhance the understanding and implementation of the updates in the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of case-based learning (CBL) integrated with the PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle in improving the knowledge and skills of surgeons related to the most recent Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Eighty surgeons from county-level hospitals were recruited and randomly assigned to two groups for a comparative study: one experiencing CBL alone and the other receiving CBL combined with the PDCA cycle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants in both groups underwent a 5-day breast cancer therapeutic strategy course. The effectiveness of these methodologies was assessed using pretraining and post-training tests, examinations, and a satisfaction questionnaire. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare the knowledge gains between the two groups using pretraining and post-training assessment scores, with the significance level set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both instructional methods resulted in knowledge improvement, but the group that received CBL with PDCA demonstrated significantly higher scores on post-training tests, particularly regarding updates in guidelines (80% vs 76%, P = 0.002) and accuracy in case-based therapeutic plans (92% vs 83%, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concludes that the integration of the PDCA cycle with CBL significantly enhances the surgeons' acquisition and application of updated therapeutic knowledge and skills for breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":19431,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"28 5","pages":"666-671"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_161_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In county-level hospitals in China, there is a need to enhance the understanding and implementation of the updates in the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer.

Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of case-based learning (CBL) integrated with the PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle in improving the knowledge and skills of surgeons related to the most recent Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Eighty surgeons from county-level hospitals were recruited and randomly assigned to two groups for a comparative study: one experiencing CBL alone and the other receiving CBL combined with the PDCA cycle.

Methods: Participants in both groups underwent a 5-day breast cancer therapeutic strategy course. The effectiveness of these methodologies was assessed using pretraining and post-training tests, examinations, and a satisfaction questionnaire. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare the knowledge gains between the two groups using pretraining and post-training assessment scores, with the significance level set at P < 0.05.

Results: Both instructional methods resulted in knowledge improvement, but the group that received CBL with PDCA demonstrated significantly higher scores on post-training tests, particularly regarding updates in guidelines (80% vs 76%, P = 0.002) and accuracy in case-based therapeutic plans (92% vs 83%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The study concludes that the integration of the PDCA cycle with CBL significantly enhances the surgeons' acquisition and application of updated therapeutic knowledge and skills for breast cancer.

案例学习结合PDCA在基层外科医生CSCO乳腺诊疗指南更新培训中的应用(2023)
背景:在中国县级医院,有必要加强对新版《乳腺癌诊疗指南》的理解和实施。目的:本研究的目的是评估基于病例的学习(CBL)与PDCA(计划-执行-检查-行动)循环相结合在提高外科医生对最新的中国临床肿瘤学会(CSCO)乳腺癌诊断和治疗指南的知识和技能方面的有效性。从县级医院招募80名外科医生,随机分为两组进行比较研究:一组单独接受CBL,另一组接受CBL联合PDCA循环。方法:两组患者均接受为期5天的乳腺癌治疗策略疗程。通过训练前和训练后的测试、考试和满意度问卷来评估这些方法的有效性。采用训练前和训练后的评估分数对两组的知识增益进行统计学分析,显著性水平设为P < 0.05。结果:两种教学方法都导致知识的提高,但接受CBL和PDCA的组在训练后测试中表现出显著更高的分数,特别是在指南的更新方面(80%对76%,P = 0.002)和基于病例的治疗计划的准确性方面(92%对83%,P < 0.001)。结论:PDCA循环与CBL的结合可显著提高外科医生对乳腺癌最新治疗知识和技能的获取和应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
275
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice is a Monthly peer-reviewed international journal published by the Medical and Dental Consultants’ Association of Nigeria. The journal’s full text is available online at www.njcponline.com. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal makes a token charge for submission, processing and publication of manuscripts including color reproduction of photographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信